this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
423 points (96.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70009 readers
153 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A license verification certificate expires and when it expires, Microsoft Office for Mac assumes it's unlicensed even if it has been fully paid for.

So, any idiot who paid for Office 2019 for Mac "perpetual" will lose access to it next month.

The same will happen with Office 2021 and Office 2024 in the future.

Pirates are unaffected, only who paid for the product gets punished

Good job 👍🏻

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 95 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Disclaimer: I wrote "idiot" to describe someone who paid for the product not because they're actually idiots, but it's because Microsoft is treating them like that: their official solution on the website is "simply subscribe to the latest and greatest or buy a new "perpetual" license to office 2024 to continue using what you paid for"

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Nah I think you summed it up pretty well. People who bought an overpriced machine, and then decided they'd run overpriced software on it. Two companies I wouldn't touch with a galaxy sized pole. If they didn't learn anything from them before this, they will be as described.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where do you buy a galaxy sized pole?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wouldn't even want to pirate it. I like LibreOffice a lot better.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do some work for an org that is MS office centric. They provide me with an office license, and space in one drive. I essentially use office to check final output to share with them, but do the actual work in LO. The only thing that goes in onedrive is their stuff.

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, excel is such overkill for the average user. Loding a csv in calc would probably be good enough for the majority.

I was actually taught how to use spreadsheets in Microsoft Works. Which was the cheaper home alternative to the Office suite, that was good enough to run a small business out of.

[–] nerv@fedinsfw.app 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The usual lot says Excel is better. Haven't found a difference yet.

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used excel daily in a corporate environment for the last 10 years of my working life lots of VBA etc. I was the person people came to for excel help. I'm now retired and treasurer for a small non-profit and I use LibreOffice. It's good, but not as good. My needs are pretty basic now, so I'm not pushing the capabilities, but my main gripe for now is formatting pivot tables.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Your needs are pretty basic? Heh, pretty Visual BASIC!?

VISUAL BASIC FOR APPLICATIONS!?!

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I understand for home use calc, especially, works just fine, but I have to deal with editing excel files at work daily... I can't even run VBA's. And if I save the file in calc it gets messed up.

The issue is the same as always, that some guy used excel first, and now I have to use it too otherwise I need to redo the entire excel file. I can't be bothered.

[–] nerv@fedinsfw.app 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The company I work for pays horrors for the full MS suite. That alone should be enough to force some thinking.

But I digress.

I'm not a desk jokey but I have to fill a sheet daily and occasionally a few other documents. I only use LibreOffice.

When I first received the models, they were filled with errors and bad formatting. And printing the sheet always put out shrunk versions of the document, hard to read. I got printed copies along with the digital files, "in case I couldn't open the files".

My spreadsheet jailbroke the document, allowing me to rectify the errors and the prints come out using the entire sheet, with better end results than the official version.

Someone, very well paid, is wasting a lot of money.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's most interesting and baffling to me is that most people think libreoffice "breaks" things. But so far, every time I looked into it, libreoffice "breaking something" usually flows like this:

  • Excel implements some functionality in non-standard ways.
  • Calc / libreoffice goes to apply the functionality using the correct, standard way.
  • Sheet is now "broken", aka not with the expected data.
  • I get yelled at for having dared to use Calc to copy paste some data in a file without even touching scrips or pivot tables or whatever the hell.

Every. Single. Fucking time.

I got to a point where I tell them to wank off if they ask me to do something and I don't have easy access to Windows.

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"implementing things in non-standard ways", have been their modus operandi for about 3 decades now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's by design.

Calc will do nearly everything Exel will: but MS wants to lock people into their ecosystem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, LO equivalent is to use python inside calc but you can use python outside of Excel just as easily so there's no reason for people to switch from what they currently have.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

that's like saying you can ise visual basic outside of excel, so there's no point in using it in excel

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for spelling-out the stupid for me. My brain was hung-up on the correct way to un-fuck logic I would rather not understand, for a moment. "Too stupid for words" came to mind, and the phrase just sorta ... hung out, wasting time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Hows about you don’t even worry about pirating it and just move to opensource?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’m far from a spreadsheet super user, but Excel really is in a class by itself. The rest of the office suite, however, is easily replaced by open source.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone who uses Excel on a daily basis: Excel is a bloated, unstable, bug-ridden pile of crap

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Indeed a class of its own, at least since the fall of Lotus.

[–] passenger@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Try LibreOffice calc.

I think Word is harder to replace because formatting issues assuming documents are in word format

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I use Calc, and it does just fine for my use case. But I know people in finance whose work relies on the powerful advanced features excel has and LO just doesn’t yet.

Funny enough, I haven’t touched a word processor or slide deck program in years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Sorry, but no. It's awful. Tried it out when I was doing my taxes. Basic shit is just hidden and convoluted it just not possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

while I'm generally in support of paying for the product you get value from, this just goes to show that you should never purchase a Microsoft license. ever. they do not respect you, their agreement with you, or basic ethics. do not feel bad about pirating Microsoft products.

but even better, just use something else.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup. Libreoffice is epic af.

[–] not@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But 90% of my Excel usage is data transformation using VBA...

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Time to learn python or javascript. You will learn a real language and get away from a Microsoft product.

[–] shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably the most easiest software to replace: LibreOffice, OnlyOffice, Collabora...

[–] dukatos@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Softmaker office...

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 17 points 1 month ago

That's a quality headline rewrite.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Good job Microsoft!

Meanwhile, in the few cases I need Excel, I just install Office 2013 in Wine. ~~Dunno if any later version works correctly, don't even really care tbh~~

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do people even bother pirating this shit? Surely they just use one of the many free alternatives that do exactly the same job?

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I use LibreOffice and LibreOffice only. It does not do exactly the same job.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mtpender@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›