I can accept that there might be levels of good that can only be reached with a better grinder, but I've had much better than I'm getting now with my current grinder - I'm just trying to get back to that.
GreatBlueHeron
I've cleaned the grinder and I'll see how that goes.
This grinder is only just over 4 years old - I've had the same model for over 10 years but moved county and left one behind and bought a new one.
I know my water isn't perfect - I get a bit of salty residue on the chilled water dispenser in my fridge. I might try some (bulk) bottled water.
I really struggle with the coffee compass - I can't describe (even to myself) what I'm tasting, or relate it to what I'm supposed to be tasting, so I can't relate it to what I need to adjust. I just know if I like it. I'm the same with wine - I did a tasting course and most of it was lost on me.
It was well past due:

I only drink coffee with breakfast, so I'll report back tomorrow.
I have done it, but it's been a while. I haven't noticed any change when I've done it in the past, but I'll give it a try.
I've read a lot of fucked up shit in the last few years - that's the first time I've thrown my phone in response!
(My phone's fine - I just threw it onto the sofa beside me, but still..)
What are you using to ship the logs to VL?
That's the reason I'm here asking about logging. I'm in the process of changing and wondering if I should switch it all up. I was using systemd-journal-remote, but I'm switching from Debian to Alpine so - no more systemd.
you should start excluding them before they reach VL
Now that confuses me. As I said in my original post - I had some preconceptions about centralised logging before I set it up, and having a single place to manage filters was certainly something I was hoping to get from it. Also any filtering would only be for reporting. I'd like to keep a full set of log data for potential problem analysis etc.
Yeah, I've been doing some more reading. Victoria Logs is doing a good job consolidating my logs and is very lightweight. It's the visualisation that I'm missing. Grafana can do it, but I'm having trouble getting my head around it. That's OK - it's just my home lab and it's mainly a learning exercise - I need to learn some more.
I'm already running a grafana instance, so I'll look into elastic/filebeat. Thanks.
It's fun to point at the crappy performance of current technology. But all I can think about is the amount of power and hardware the AI bros are going to burn through trying to improve their results.
Saying Redhat is based on Fedora just seems wrong. I know there was discussion about this when the simpler version was posted and I think I understand that, today, RHEL is downstream of Fedora. But Redhat existed before Fedora so it still feels wrong to say Fedora is based on Redhat.
"Fedora Core 1 was the first version of Fedora and was released on November 6, 2003.[15] It was codenamed Yarrow. Fedora Core 1 was based on Red Hat Linux 9."
This is perfectly logical and I agree. Except that this controversy has prompted me to go learn about Lennart Poettering. I've been using systemd forever and I like it - I like journald and remote journald, I like networkd, I even deleted cron off my systems and use systemd timers exclusively. I knew there was some controversy about Lennart, but I didn't really care. Now that I've read a bit about his background and, maybe more importantly, his new company - I don't have a good feeling for the future of systemd.
Well I fully cleaned and serviced my machine yesterday and my coffee today was maybe a little better, but still lacking. That leaves beans and water. There was a drought here last summer and the water table has changed. I really should test my water and service the softener. But, in the short term - I'll buy a jug of water nest time I'm in town and try making coffee with that.