this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
1090 points (98.1% liked)

cats

28816 readers
163 users here now

Typical internet cats. Videos, pics, memes, and discussion welcome!

Rule 1) Be kind

Rule 2) Follow the lemmy.world rules

other cat communities

midwest.social cats

cats with jobs

birds, some cats

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 165 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

the jewelry is the least important thing about being married.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think my spouse and I spent... $80 total on our rings. Seemed like a waste of money to both of us.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That was us. Our wedding bands were about that all in, and I got their engagement ring for about $125.

I think everything we did for our wedding, rings included, was around $1500. The majority of that was booze.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Good on you, when I hear how much people are spending on weddings man. Over 50k is "normal" to them? We put our money to a down payment. Much better use for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We didn't do rings. I worked in a chemistry lab, husband has a skin issue and wearing a ring would probably mean nonstop doctor visits.

So we just didn't have rings. It's really very simple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

I agree with you, but I'd say it's a 50/50 toss up with women. Half of them would agree with us. The other half are too busy planning a 300k wedding on a 15/hr salary. Those types sometimes care more about the ring than the partner.

I know a lot of women who would be thrilled to be proposed to with a cat.

In the past, I've also known women who would be sour that they didn't get a ring. I try not to know that type of person for long.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 79 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Smart. Easier to say 'no' to a shiny rock, hard to say it to a kitten.

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

She could say no, but she won't. Because of the implication.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 weeks ago

"We both know that this cat only lives if you say yes"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 63 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

22 years of marriage here. Never bought, given, or worn a diamond in my life.

Marriage rings are a marketing campaign created to sell you a piece of carbon that is so "rare" they put them on $12 drill bit sets.

Yep. Yep. Different quality stones. Gotcha. Interested in buying a bridge by chance?

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Carbon is the 4th most abundant element in the galaxy. Silicon is twice as rare, so maybe spend 6 month’s salary on a quartz ring instead? Either that, or save up for a down payment on a house. Nah, who needs a place to live when you can have a hunk of mineral, right?

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

If I’m spending 6 months salary on silicon, it better at least run Doom.

[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

How much for the bridge? I would need a guarantee though that it's actually used and not just buolilt on flat land in the middle of nowhere! I am no fool after all.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus 54 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

noo but they didn't pay a significant amount of money to the diamond industry!!

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 34 points 3 weeks ago

Won't anyone think of the slave owners?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That he can't afford it is a stupid assumption imo, this looks like a deliberate choice. Being responsible for raising and taking care of a kitten together is a much bigger commitment than wearing a ring.

Meh, it's all fake af probably but the initial post says he was couldn't afford a ring so if we're going with it then yeah he is poor in this hypothetical.

[–] Pickleideas@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Guarantee you that cat will cost more in the first year than a ring from a fancy jewelry store

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 39 points 3 weeks ago

Cost? Yes.

But WORTH! Also YES!!! 🐈

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

You severely underestimate the cost of jewelry. And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word "wedding" in front of it.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word “wedding” in front of it.

In some cases, you can get around that by just not mentioning the whole 'wedding' thing.

And the ring is one of those cases. Just go to the jewelry store, pick one out, and never mention what it's for. No reason for any price surcharges -- a ring is a ring.


In other cases, though, you really shouldn't take such shortcuts. That is, if you're particular about how you want your wedding to go.

Take the florist for example. For a regular (regular price) order, if you've ordered 100 yellow roses for the table settings, but they're out of yellow roses, they'll just substitute in 100 white roses instead and call it a day.

But if you're particular about 'your special day' being perfect and you must have the yellow roses, that's when the florist needs to know that it's for a wedding, specifically. And no matter what happens, they'll do their damnedest to make sure you get the yellow roses you ordered, no substitutions. And that extra mile of effort is what the 400% price surcharge is for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate these made up headlines.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

"Man going to eat kitten in front of his succubus goddess wife to proof his devotion"

[–] Upperhand@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Could you imagine being so shallow that the only thing that's important is spending a lot of money and not having genuine love...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That is going to be one very very rough pet passing in 1-2 decades

[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And likely a treasure trove of memories that both celebrate their cat and symbolize their relationship once they deal with the worst of their grief and can enjoy the positive feelings again.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's weird to fixate on the eventual death of an elderly cat when you've fully neglected to mourn all the furniture that kitten is going to massacre

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Normalize not buying useless $2000 USD pieces of junk that starved children in Congo had to dig with bare hands, just to marry your soul mate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 22 points 3 weeks ago

Grab her with the pussy.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why would it matter if you can't afford jewelry to get married? If this were at a time where the husband is expected to be the sole earner, that could be a problem. But this is 2026. He's working, she's working, and getting married will not change that.

If anything, his and her individual financial burden will decrease by getting married by combining their finances and sharing bills, if they aren't spending stupid money on diamond rings, big weddings, exotic honeymoons, etc. They'll share a home, utilities, online subscriptions, etc. That will save them both money. If they can afford to live individually without luxuries, they can more easily afford to live together, maybe with the occasional luxury.

Stupid take.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If a man tried to propose to me with a kitten I think my brain would short out from joy at getting a kitten and I wouldn't hear another word out of his mouth. I'd totally miss the actual proposal and just be delighted at the kitten.

I got my first cat when he was a kitten and the moment I laid eyes on him my heart melted and my brain turned to scrambled eggs and 10 years later I still have the exact same reaction every single time I look at him.

load more comments (4 replies)

Apparently the idea of poor people getting married is too woke for Julie :P

[–] mnfalconia_a2gc@retrolemmy.com 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A little data point on the whole marriage thing... I and my life partner have been together for 20 y, will be 21 in September. We never got married and we don't have any rings. I keep hearing that a lot of marriages these days don't last this long.

We do informally call each other "my wife", but still, no formal marriage was ever done.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

The only reason marriages lasted longer back in the day was because women were essentially indirectly forced to be with men. The whole bank account thing in the US is a really good example of how screwed women were. There were a lot of very long marriages that were deeply unhappy.

Nowadays, women get at least some amount of freedom to choose their partners and hundreds/thousands of years of men not having to actually be good people has meant that many of us are lonely and blame the women for having some standards. Good communication and mutual respect go a long way and those are the marriages that last these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A ring is cheaper than vet bills.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At first glance I honestly thought she looked horrified because he was interrupting her on the toilet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 12 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

what happens when the cat dies, contractually?

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Ritual suicide.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I really hate those pictures that just show some randoms with a sob story. I always feel that they are totally fake.

(and if this is true: You can get cheap wedding rings. You do not have to pay thousands of money for them. You can get a cheap ring and that does work, too. Feel free to propose to the human you love even if you can't afford some expensive ring)

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 20 points 3 weeks ago

(You also do not need a ring at all.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ravelin@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Too bad they have to divorce when the cat dies.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just put the cat in a box with a radioactive substances. Scroedinger's marriage.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

respect to whoever censored the handles and not driving eternal hate to Julie every time this meme gets reposted. Also I didnt realise proposing with a cat was an option this is getting added to my proposal consideration

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think she said “yes.” And Julie sucks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›