BillibusMaximus

joined 2 years ago

Of course it doesn't look like one... They're robots in disguise.

Lots of methods work, but they each have their own pros and cons. Different yields, different risks, different costs, etc. There is no method that is perfect, IMHO.

That said, shroomscout's guide is good, though personally I found 90sm's videos to be similar content but easier to digest. ( He also had a video on fruiting from the bag but I've never tried it)

I don't know your situation but I know a lot of people on this path are doing it to try to deal with shit they haven't otherwise been able to deal with.

If that describes you, then my advice is to inoculate a few bags using whatever method you feel like you can handle right now.

If you have a normal size syringe, you can do several bags of UB and still have a lot left over to try again.

Then, while you're waiting for growth, keep learning. If it doesn't work out, figure out what went wrong, fix it, and try again.

As someone who had to carry one of these for work at the time -

One of the most ridiculous things about it, was that you didn't have to use the speakerphone with the walkie talkie feature. You could hold it up to your ear like a regular cell phone, talk at a normal volume, hear the other person perfectly fine, and actuate the PTT with your thumb (or index finger if left handed) when necessary.

There was zero reason to use it as obnoxiously as most people did.

If you want EQ without most of the modern comforts, you might consider trying one of the fan-run emulated servers like Project 1999.

But it still isn't quite the same. And to me, it can't be, because I think that part of the magic was how new and different a lot of it was for a lot of the players (It wasn't the first MMO, but it was a lot of people's first MMO).

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It works except when it doesn't.

Our previous cats (who have all crossed the rainbow bridge) were happy to use scratching posts.

Our current cats are a different story. We've tried scratching posts with various coverings, including cardboard, jute, and carpet, and even uncovered, bare wood. They all prefer one particular chair, and occasionally the wood trim on one corner of the kitchen.

Shrug

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There are some older studies that indicate it may be an issue if you eat them raw.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3731070/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2132000/

(and maybe more, but I'm lazy)

But the latter one seems to suggest that cooking them (including eating canned mushrooms, which get cooked during the canning process) should to mitigate it.

Maybe the underwear gnomes are using the bag clips to hang the missing socks to dry.

I love that gill shot

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What works for me:

  1. Have radar coverage to keep an eye on biter expansion

  2. Keep an eye on your pollution cloud, and reduce production (at least initially) if it's expanding too fast.

  3. Build up military tech alongside your other tech

  4. Pending 3, take out biter nests that expand too close to the edge of your pollution cloud.

If you can do 1-4, biters should never actually get to your base.

Then by the time you're ready to go off world, make sure you have a perimeter lined with turrets (and some walls to help protect the turrets), repair bots and repair kits, automated ammo production, and supply lines (belts or trains) to automatically get that ammo to your perimeter turrets.

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it's normal.

I made a similar move a few years ago, from 10+ years at the old job. There were red flags that came up a couple months in, but I decided to stick it out.

It took me over a year to really feel like it was the right decision. But the red flags faded as it turned out there were just some growing pains going on. Leadership managed to resolve the major issues and I've turned out to be pretty happy in the new position.

I'm not saying the same will be true for you... Some red flags signal issues that are correctable, but others signal toxicity or other things that are unlikely to be fixed.

But IMHO, 3 weeks seems like a short time unless the issues are really egregious.

Also consider that if you go back to your old job, your old boss may treat you worse than previously.

If you don't like the new job and don't want to give it more time, consider starting to look for something new immediately (you were headhunted, so your skills are obviously desirable) and continuing to move forward rather than going back.

My 2c.

If you've been trying for a while and still haven't gotten it working, then I'm probably missing something regarding your requirements.

But at first glance, it seems like it would be solved with 2 server blocks, 1 for 80, 1 for 443, each with their own proxy config passing / to their respective target ports.

[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But for the sake of readability it would be much better to simply have username@mysite.com than username@mail.mysite.com

That's kind of unrelated. You can configure a mail server at mail.mysite.com to handle mail to/from username@mysite.com. You don't need a proxy for that.

But what if I do want my services to be accessed through mysite.com directly instead of a specific per-service subdomain?

If they're all http(s) services, then that should be possible. I don't know anything about caddy, but with apache or nginx you can proxy based on path, so I'd assume you can with caddy also.

For example mysite.com/chat could route to your chat app, mysite.com/webmail route to your webmail app, etc. But this isn't necessarily plug-and-play, because depending on the app you might need to set up proxy rules for cookie rewriting, link rewriting, etc.

If you want to proxy non-http(s) traffic from 1 port to multiple destination apps, then it gets a LOT more complicated.

view more: next ›