this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
549 points (99.3% liked)

memes

21400 readers
2660 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

That's one of things that bothers me about how AI is being pushed in the workplace. Assuming AI actually does manage to help me get my work done faster, it's not like I get to home earlier or work less days. I'm just going to get more work piled on me.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It has always been like that. We invent machines to help us be more productive. Not to work less, but to produce more. And every time people protest because some people are losing their jobs. Time passes, new types of jobs pop up. Rinse and repeat.

That being said. I'm not particularly on board with A.I. Sure, it can do some really impressive things, but at the same time I think it's been hyped way above its limits, and I'm not a fan of its environmental footprint. I just don't think the result is worth price. But I guess only time will tell.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's because of our economic system being build upon people having to work to get money to live while at the same time naturally "the system" is trying to be more and more efficient so less and less work is needed. It's an inherent problem which becomes more obvious with AI. Imagine a world where robots are doing all the work. Wouldn't it be great? No one has to work anymore. I think it would be possible but only with a radical systemic change how our societies work. Also, I don't think we are even close to be there, but that would be the goal, wouldn't it?

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It's the problem with how companies operate. As a whole we should be working towards utopia. But there's no desire to pay into social programs, only to extract money from other (usually non-billionaire) people, and avoid paying them so that extracted money stays in their hands. It's the "No Take, Only Throw" dog meme but "No wages, only spend."

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

and a pizza party for compensation

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Pizza partys' got nothin on the waffle party

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

I mean, if you ain't drowning in it, are you really working? And if you are, you should get off your ass and work harder so we can drop more work on you!

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will never forget that company I used to work for before I moved which was like: "Yeah we need you to bring in 12500€/month so you finance your own salary + bring in 100% in profit, we literally don't care how long it takes lol". I had months where I worked one week, hit that line and then had the rest of the month as vacation lmao.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'd love if they had reasonable targets that being efficient made you have feee time.

When I asked my boss how do I manage 40 hours if I finish some tasks faster than others, they were like "just let me know what that happens, I need to give you more work" lol

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Which if you have a cool boss will be "tell me" wink wink and you might do a little extra just as a treat. If you have a shit boss it'll be "take more anyway you seem like you're not busy".

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Never tell them how long it’s really going to take. How else will you look like a miracle worker?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Under promise and over deliver is still king.

"I cannot guarantee something won't go sideways. I need at least 3 weekends of overtime available to be certain before it's released."

Deliver it 10 days later. Or 12, after relaxing for a day or two.

Your timeframe stands. New project? Do it again. Give yourself ~100-150% extra room.

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

The amount of times i have given myself +40% time to get a job done and then a bunch if shit gets dropped on me, and they are like "oh i though you said you would have it done by wednesday", and im like "are you fucking kidding me, do you not remember the multiple days that were lost because i had to drop everything for X and Y issues you had?" blank stare for seconds "...so we arent submitting today?"

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Always multiply your estimates by a factor of four.

Then find the bottle of green stuff.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Then find the bottle of green stuff.

I don't know what workplace you're at, but mine isn't fancy enough for absinthe.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's more addictive than Aldebaran whiskey! And way more expensive too!

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That shit looks soo good! 😋🤤

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you nuts? Do you know how much a pizza party costs? You little ungrateful shits, we’re gonna buy even more yachts now

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 3 points 1 day ago

weren't you just gonna buy more yachts anyways, though?

Gee, aren't yachts amazingly flammable for being watercraft, though?

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Making it is one. Then there is paperwork, all the changes never mentioned and sitting in meetings. Now the time needed it's times four. It's legit.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Star Trek Engineers in a nutshell

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is part of why scumbags want to kill work from home.

I can finish a task in an hour and fuck off. Harder to do in an office.

They could also not be fucking counter productive management, and I'd keep working on stuff. But they'd rather have a bunch of pRoCeSs and nonsense.

[–] dragonlover@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

When I was in the office I would browse the internet or wander around to waste time when I'd completed my tasks and wanted to avoid having more dumped on me. Now I clean the house or meal prep or play with my cat.

I'm still reachable by slack for emergencies. If anything I'm MORE available because people don't have to wander around the building to find me if something explodes.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 3 points 20 hours ago

This is true but you have to remember that management is stupid. Stupid and cruel, but mostly stupid.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm in the fortunate position where boss people are impressed by how much work I do to help the others struggling with having bad bosses.

It pays well but plateaus as you start running out of bosses to defeat. Then you get in this awkward situation where everyone a tier below the c-suite wants you, but don't understand that you aren't up for sale in their game.

Been in NFP for a decade and people are still the same. But in NFP you get the leftovers that were never smart enough to be touched for a corporate role. Their idiocy cascades down to a workforce of 15,000 people that have to endure it; people that signed up to help others.

So, that's my job. Fuck the money—40% of my paycheck is donated—and my time is spent being real good at helping others by showing up the overpaid morons that make life hard. And surfing. And trains. And birdwatching and trees.

I'm intoxicated an am oversharing. o7

Fuck bosses. They're so useless, weak, and easy to defeat. All you gotta do is break their "network" with logic, and if that fails, a unionised force.

I somehow started rambling again...

[–] TotallyWorthLife@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I only understood "unionised force" and I gotta say "based".

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

I read it as un-ionised and didn't make a lot of sense.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is something to be said for unionising on a micro level. A team of 3 or 4 can make much more ground than organising 1000 workers. Always look for that opportunity by getting deep and essential. Never let them know it's coming and always have an idiot boss to deflect to so they canabalise each other.

Done well, you get deeper by "saving the day" or whatever.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Beginning to think my productivity is simply being captured by my boss and turned into profit for my company's investors.

[–] adb@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Without giving you your faire share? They wouldn’t dare.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only do enough work to avoid getting fired.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Identify the ones who match your salary level, then observe how little work they can get away with. Then set your engagement level a few steps above that. That’s the sweet spot. If they get fired, adjust accordingly.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Remember, never work any harder or faster than you're getting paid for.

[–] polydactyl@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Unless you have a way to leave as soon as the work is finished. Which we all should be given that.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 18 hours ago

And never turn in your work product until it’s due. Work done early means more work.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Also, personality is often more important than how hard you work.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Took me 20 years to realise getting things done quicker than others doesn't bring you shit if you get paid per hour. You have to stay your 8 hours and you'll just always be the work donkey and the lazy ass flirting with the boss will get promoted.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago
[–] connaisseur@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Agh, I thought the working dude threw his pile onto the manager while he was bringing more and I was like YES

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could work faster and get my shit done but why would I want to have my bosses give me more shit to do.

I already have two people's work to do by myself, I'm not going to move faster than a shuffle for what they pay me.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 21 hours ago

I generally dislike working at a shuffle. My work day is over much faster if I'm in a bit of a rush throughout. I don't see it as me getting paid for a certain amount of work. I see it as me selling my time. Between 08:00 and 16:00, what I do during that time is up to my boss. I don't own that time, in exchange I get my pay.

I live in a country with actual workers rights though. Might make a difference.