jtrek

joined 8 months ago
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 9 hours ago

If we had some sort of new Nuremberg trial he might die in front of a crowd.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I had a similar thought. A nice HUD for navigation would be nice. But we live in the bad place, so it's all privacy invading enshittifying trash.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Things being illegal doesn't mean they don't happen. And, again, if people were redlined in 1960 and now a neighborhood is mostly black, that didn't magically go away in 2026. The consequences are lasting.

Furthermore, as an individual, fighting more powerful institutions (eg: banks, the government) is not trivial. Shrugging it off with "you should report is" is technically true, but not a complete solution nor especially practical.

Breaking everything down to racism is naive

Well that's not what's happening in this discussion, so okay

focusing on what actually keeps people segregated, like socioeconomic status.

Deeply tied into race, historically and presently.

Regardless, the point stands that there's few to no good reasons for an employer to know your address during the application process, and a lot of bad ones.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

This isn’t the 1960’s. There’s no more segregation and people can live wherever they afford.

Redlining is less of a thing, but there are still areas that are predominantly populated by different ethnic groups. Furthermore, the consequences of housing segregation are still felt today. It's not like the people who were forced to live in "undesirable" neighborhoods in the 1960s got reshuffled around.

To say "there's no more segregation" is naive.

And even furthermore, it opens the door for unfair judgements like "oh they live in a bad neighborhood", which might not be first order racist, but are still undesirable. There's no need for it. Only unfair things can come from the information.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 19 hours ago

I just... I don't have a horse in this race. I'm a cis dude. This should just be between some other family and their doctors/therapists to decide what's best.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 56 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Had an exchange that went like

"The workers don't know how to run the business"

"Did the owner tell you that?"

"... shit."

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 17 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

If I was in charge, I'd make some changes to the job process

  • you must post the salary
  • if you post a job and it's determined there was no intent to fill the role, you must pay every applicant a year's salary. Whistleblowers also get a payout.
  • making the applicant fill out a form that duplicates information on the resume (eg: name, phone) is illegal.
  • asking for the applicant's address is illegal. They were going to use this for racism. You can ask about time zone and willingness to commute to the office
  • employers must pay workers for their commute at their normal hourly rate.
  • Ghosting an applicant (no response without a rejection or hire for a month) results in a fine. Pay the applicant 3 months salary.

All other fines now scale with wealth of the perpetrator

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Class solidarity

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 19 points 21 hours ago

There's a thing in our culture where we simultaneously tell people to work hard, and to become the guy at the top who doesn't work.

CEOs and managers and such often don't really do much work. They're not in the weeds making the thing go. They don't spot that O(n^2) algorithm and fix it so the site doesn't go down under load. They send a message that says "site seems slow", and someone actually fixes it.

This is a problem all over. The people we let make decisions aren't the people doing the work. They don't know how things work.

AI creates a smaller version of this. It turns you into an idiot leader, but without the benefit of taking all the profits from labor.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago

I get most of my music from Bandcamp, on bandcamp friday's. It sucks they sold out and are probably circling the drain, but for a long time they were a solid independent source.

Buying directly from the band at a show or through their label is also cool.

It's more of an up-front cost, but after years of doing this I have a large drm-free library.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

I really thought this was the onion. Satire is dead.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where does "I did a web search and found an answer on an AI generated source" land? I feel like the Internet is increasingly infected, and finding actual answers to stuff is hard.

 

LinkedIn is kind of the bad place, but I'm on there a lot looking for work. I happened to see an informal poll asking if people would go back to a world before AI. I fully expected LinkedIn to be gushing over how great AI is, but (with an admittedly tiny sample size) it's not so hot.

  • 59% absolutely want to go back
  • 14% say AI is the future
  • 22% say they're excited but concerned
  • 2% are undecided, somehow.

This made me feel a little better, somehow.

 

I'm a simple man. I do a lot of rice and beans with random spices for dinner, and oatmeal with peanut butter and sometimes fruit for lunch.

Sometimes I get fake-burgers, which are tasty and super easy in the air fryer, but aren't nearly as cheap.

There's lots of other stuff out there. What do you like that's the best intersection of fast, easy, cheap?

 

As the title says, how often do you admit you're wrong? Is it different when it's a factual dispute versus something more subjective?

I make an effort to concede early if I'm in error. I think because my mother almost never admits fault. She'll fall back to "that's not what I meant" or similar deflections first, and that's really annoying.

The last big factual error I made was about the distance of walking, and that's where I learned about Taxicab Geometry ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab_geometry ).

I think some people believe admitting fault is a sign of weakness, but I find it's more of a power move. It takes strength to do it, and people can tell when you're sweating and desperate. Usually it leads to resolving the conflict faster and cheaper, too.

(I expect some people will feel the urge to reply they're never wrong. I'll file that under never admits fault.)

 

This is the bad place.

It's fucking toilet paper. I don't need a summary.

Not only are they wasting time, energy, and screen space with this slop, it seems to have come with a bug preventing me from adding anything to my cart. I just get 403s when trying.

I can only assume management demanded engineering maximize their AI usage at the expense of boring things like testing and stability.

I hate this.

view more: next ›