this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
560 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

86249 readers
3940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 100 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"This technology turns every router into a potential means for surveillance," warns Julian Todt from KASTEL. "If you regularly pass by a café that operates a WiFi network, you could be identified there without noticing it and be recognized later -- for example by public authorities or companies."

Later...

Inexpensive or older routers either don’t store history at all or keep it for a short time.

Newer models can store more information for more extended periods.

https://www.thetechwire.com/how-long-does-a-router-store-history/

[–] morto@piefed.social 61 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We used to recommend people to run the newest stuff possible, but we came to a point that maybe it's better for us to keep with older tech for a good while

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or go to more civilized countries for vacation to get not backdoored hardware.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

From what I've just read, the tech doesn't seem ready to identify people yet. It can supposedly detect hand gestures, but facial recognition I seriously doubt. But that's probably just a matter of improving the tech. See this article for more info.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

From OPs linked article...

In tests involving 197 participants, the researchers said the system identified individuals with nearly 100% accuracy. The recognition remained effective regardless of viewing angle or how the participants walked.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have fun watching me be balls deep in my partner, fed boys. Be jelly cause you can't fuck like me.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm already envious 🙂‍↕️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 70 points 1 month ago (10 children)

It would be great if there were some open source tool kits for this. If the technology is going to exist it should be in the hands of the people.

[–] Snoopey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Mora@pawb.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn, I thought I called it 8 months ago, but that was about reading heart rates using wifi...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, if this shit hast to exist, at least let me use it for presence detection in Home Assistant without having to buy separate sensors or something!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

If you're technical you might like enjoy this article that explains how the tracking works. Basically the router can perform math on the interference created by objects moving around the room. It seems like this would have to be part of the router firmware, which doesn't sound like a standard feature. But if it is, the fix would be to install modified firmware with that function disabled. The smoking gun will be if somebody gets into DMCA trouble for doing this.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

From what I've read this is built into the required wifi router for Xfinity. I discovered this when I signed up for Xfinity fiber, had the fiber installed and setup and then cancelled it the same day, because of this and not being able to buy and run my own hardware, and needing to install an app on my phone to manage the router, and apparently not being able to choose my DNS. They required that I rent their hardware for an additional $15/mo. Oh well, at least fiber is in the house now, if anyone wants it in the future. I sure won't be paying them to spy on me.

Fuck Comcast, still.

[–] FEIN@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

app to manage router

This shit was a pain in the ass and now learning about this makes me feel even more pissed off

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Very interesting concept. I was curious about how in the hell this could be done. This article explains the general method.

When an inert object like a person moves around between the router and stationary connected devices like computers and printers, it interferes with the signal. The pattern of interference plus math can be used to plot the movement of the object - and even measure subtle changes like hand gestures. Home security software from companies like Xfinity can already use this tech to send you an alert when something is moving around in your house, without needing additional hardware. Imagine an informercial where a guy holds up a handful of "clumsy motion sensors" with wires sticking out of them, and "confusing instructions". Not if you just let your router do it!

As far as being a new and sinister means of surveillance, evil companies could already theoretically tap into anybody's motion sensors or security cams. The difference with WiFi tracking is that you wouldn't necessarily know it's there.

[–] fleck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

That's using CSI though. The article said the researches specifically did not utilize CSI.

But regarding CSI: I evaluated that as a small part of my Master's thesis and it worked pretty OK for motion detection but not for classifying other activities, at least not on a SISO link. For more complex stuff you would need both a MIMO access point (router) and device (e.g. phone). Also, you need to constantly transmit messages to get up-to-date CSI, which is not great for power consumption as well as cluttering the communication channel. There are some other constraints, especially regarding noise. E.g. I managed to completely destroy the CSI spectrogram by turning on a microwave oven. There is 802.11bf in development, which is supposed to standardize this, because currently using CSI is pretty much a "hack", as it is not intended for sensing. Once this is widely adopted, I would start being worried, but not right now.

This is from my thesis:

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Product idea: clothing with jaged edges and radio absorbing plates.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ifmu@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don’t give Musk the idea of the CyberShirt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 31 points 1 month ago (7 children)

"Oh my goodness, this is a nightmare" typed everyone into their government approved location recording devices that can show them cats and boobs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's cool and all but if true, why use an animated photo instead of a real life example?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you think an "example" would look like. It's not taking a photo of you, it's measuring what's distinctive about the way you personally mess up radio signals and how it differs from how other people mess them up. Internally it's just a ton of numbers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 1 month ago

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Comcast Is watching you masturbate. Awesome.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, they kinda already were.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 13 points 1 month ago

Especially if they've been opening all those videos I've sent

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That means "yesterday's spy tech" that now they will leak to public, because they have a way better way.
I'm not sure of the current state of my tinfoil hat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Building codes should probably include Faraday-cage type shielding.

[–] skibidi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That would prevent cell signals from inside, making it harder to (e.g.) call the fire department, or an ambulance.

[–] Capable_Coping@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the return of landlines is nigh

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Honestly, we'd be better off at this point.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Pretty sure this is old news? It's basically sonar, which The Dark Knight predicted in the film.

Edit: a word

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Comcast routers already have a feature to detect people's presence.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The Dark Knight tech was a lot closer than we realized in 2008.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ok now what router do I gotta buy and what firmware do I have to flash to plug this into Home Assistant?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The question with mandating US made routers may be either to protect citizens from foreign attacks - or to make sure every US router has a router with a government-approved backdoor.

On which option would you bet?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How do they identify a particular person though? I get you could see people as present or not or moving around the room, but it's insane that they would be able to tell facial features etc.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

A paper from around a decade ago talked about using WiFi to identify key strokes so with large data models we have today I would assume they could get pretty good fidelity on a person. Maybe not enough for “beyond a reasonable doubt” but probably enough where your WiFi company is selling your data on what you do at home

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

At this point I'd prefer the Chinese routers.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It‘s like the phone sonar tech from the Dark Knight everyone said was total BS but totally real…

[–] mattreb@feddit.it 10 points 1 month ago (11 children)

If you read the article ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3719027.3765062 ) they are testing this in an EXTREMELY controlled enviroment and directed subjects... I have my doubts that this could provide any insight on whether this is even feaseble for public surveillance, let alone effective...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm. The article appears to conflate multiple things?

One of them is “viewing” the RF spectrum to build up an image. The other is reading the unencrypted beamforming data from a router. That second one depends on people carrying a WiFi-capable piece of electronics with them doesn’t it? There has to be something for the beam to focus on, some sort of beacon signal.

Although I guess all it really needs is for the person to step between the router and a device connected to the router; that should enable analysis of the disruption patterns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sepi@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Router and WiFi Access Point are different things. There are tons of routers that do not have WiFi.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

If I was a capitalist, knowing I am few and and my power only comes from the resources I own, resources stolen from the masses. I would use my stolen wealth to safe guard my own class interests against the masses. Hence we see surveillance capitalism.

load more comments
view more: next ›