FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 11 hours ago

yeah, only time will tell.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 15 hours ago

I think the word itself, italian being closeish to latin, evokes the killing of jesus.

not my greatest moment hah

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 17 hours ago

well, for those of us who need stable employment, whole markets going downwards isn't necessarily very good either

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

looks like graph theory to me

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 20 hours ago

It's up to the American standards, for what that's worth.

Honestly, not much.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 26 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

in a democracy the latter has to be preceded by the former.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 34 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Preliminary findings from july

  • First, X designs and operates its interface for the “verified accounts” with the “Blue checkmark” in a way that does not correspond to industry practice and deceives users. Since anyone can subscribe to obtain such a “verified” status, it negatively affects users' ability to make free and informed decisions about the authenticity of the accounts and the content they interact with. There is evidence of motivated malicious actors abusing the “verified account” to deceive users.
  • Second, X does not comply with the required transparency on advertising, as it does not provide a searchable and reliable advertisement repository, but instead put in place design features and access barriers that make the repository unfit for its transparency purpose towards users. In particular, the design does not allow for the required supervision and research into emerging risks brought about by the distribution of advertising online.
  • Third, X fails to provide access to its public data to researchers in line with the conditions set out in the DSA. In particular, X prohibits eligible researchers from independently accessing its public data, such as by scraping, as stated in its terms of service. In addition, X's process to grant eligible researchers access to its application programming interface (API) appears to dissuade researchers from carrying out their research projects or leave them with no other choice than to pay disproportionally high fees.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_3761

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I went to rome once, and I found people to be super unfriendly. Like, giving me looks levels of unfriendly.

After a few hours of this I realized the problem, I was wearing a Deicide t-shirt, and rome is christian as fuck. God I'm stupid.

After a quick change people were really nice :D

that or insurance companies

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

peer networks are not illegal if the peers are consenting members.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Totally doable if this was a distributed service.

ok not randomly generated, but you know

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

nah

not even a slight chance kids today know what msn messenger is.

 

I’ve been looking around, and with every vnc cliend I can find, when I press for example super+return, the vnc client gets backgrounded and the android “desktop” is shown.

Does anyone know of a client that actually captures the keyboard?

 

Reddit used to work like this but nuked it many years ago. I like it because it gives much more information about the consensus at a glance.

view more: next ›