as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.
That number is just the E in E=mc²
If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.
FiskFisk33
joined 2 years ago
We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.
That sounds great actually! Lets see how they actually implement it though. After how they communicated this previously, I'm hesitant to get my hopes up.
when comparing to kg I will assume the mass unit, since comparing a mass value to a force has no meaning.
when compared to a value in Kg, the only logical interpretation is the mass pound. If it were lbf, the si unit conversion would be Newtons.
Having the same name for two different, but easily mixed up units is really annoying haha
The bar is defined to be close to the atmospheric pressure of one random planet called earth, why choose that as your pressure unit?
isn't that lbf?
The pund itself is defined as 0.45359237 Kg
huh?
Mass doesnt change with gravity
causes vs symptoms I guess
you missed the sixth ;)
view more: next ›
The problem with only counting calories for health has never been more aptly highlighted!