notice how in the graph on wikipedia, excluding USA the correlation is really not that strong.
dont get me wrong, i agree with the general sentiment, but bad data weakens even the best of cases.
notice how in the graph on wikipedia, excluding USA the correlation is really not that strong.
dont get me wrong, i agree with the general sentiment, but bad data weakens even the best of cases.
Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.
No it doesn't negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.
Cry me a river.
great argument.
It helps spread false information widely
It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands
It hurts the underlying sources
When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It's an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.
this is problematic on multiple levels.
sorry, I literally confused left and right just then ;p
but they are?
This is not applicable to arch tho
Each package is updated independently, you pull updates whenever you feel like it, be that monthly or every five minutes
bummer
the face is switched yeah, that's what I am referring to
yeah I think the real world is more complicated. Like, its not just about numbers, but also how control is implemented and even culture.