this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
242 points (97.3% liked)

Android

20609 readers
646 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems the pressure is working.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 160 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How generous of them that we’re allowed to install software on our mobile computers that we own.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it won't be long until you no longer own your device, just that you have a licence to operate it, that can be revoked at any time.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

That's technically how it works already, at least in theory. But we all know that's 100% bullshit.

[–] jerebear39@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why google is doing this? I just want to download apps from F-Driod. I just want to install software on a device that I own!

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago

Because they are mad about Epic winning the right to operate they're own play store on Google. They want ALL not most of the money

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 80 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Remember when Google backed off the changes to Chrome that prevented adblockers from working and a short time later implemented those changes anyway? Why TF would Google start caring about what users want now, especially since this issue is way less visible to most people? Google wants people to think they have a voice about what happens with Android, not to actually give them one.

Blocking side loading will force apps and any generated revenue into Google's Play store which is exactly the point of this no matter what Google says.

The bloviating Google is doing now is irrelevant. The company will move forward with blocking side loading within the next few months, guaranteed.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago

Exactly. They'll back down a little bit to reduce some of the bad publicity, and then later they'll quietly expand the remit until the same end is reached anyway.

The frog is boiled slowly.

[–] henfredemars 7 points 3 days ago

Google has far too much power. We should not be subject to the whims of a company that does not and cannot have our best interests at heart. For this reason, my next phone will be a Fairphone or, I hope, the new Graphene phone when it comes out late next year.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 86 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I feel like experienced users is going to be people who know how to use ADB, which means that they didn't change anything from their original statement. That's just my concern.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's wait and sew how that's supposed to work. Inb4 you have to verify yourself as experienced user to be able to do this...

[–] AGuyAcrossTheInternet@fedia.io 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In this day and age, I'd be not at all surprised if you had to pay a monthly "developer fee" or similar to get access to sideloading.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was just talking to a friend of mine last night over beers about how he'd pay to not have all these companies foist AI on him, and my response then was what it is now. Don't give them any ideas.

Oh no, I'm going to try and attract Murphy, hoping that his law still holds.

Oh I suuuuure wish we would have to pay a subscription for sideloading! I suuuure would hate if we got the feature for free permanently! Man, I soooo want to pay a subscription for this basic feature soooooo baaaaad!

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Give me root assholes. I'll show you experience.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No thanks your mom said you aren't very good at it.

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] reptar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Pizza guy distracted me

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 49 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What counts as "experienced"? Because I'm capable of installing a custom ROM

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

On another article I read, according to Google:

Anyone who's not gullible enough to turn off multiple protections, by following directions of someone scamming you.

I turn off multiple protections because they dont protect me, they are not protwctions they are artificial technical barriers to the freedom of the user

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 days ago

so we gotta pass exams to sideload now? /jk

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Honestly if they add a test you have to pass to install anything even from the Play Store and this test blocks my mum, I'm all here for it. πŸ˜‘ Some people ought to just not be allowed to install apps.

[–] oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

so long as 'wedding album' apk shared on whatsapp don't get installed, i'm content.

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

On that note, is totalvirus regarded as reliable in this context?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

That's one hell of a silver lining I can get behind.

"Please correctly tap the TWRP Logo within 1 second"

shows a bunch of random symbols spread out on the screen

There's no way a granma would be quick enough to get to it.

[–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've been using Android since gingerbread, does that make me an "experienced user"?

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Blast from the past. I had a tablet I loved that I think I upgraded from gingerbread to honeycomb (?)

Don't think I was around for froyo or whatever and before. Didn't have a smart phone yet!

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.

That sounds great actually! Lets see how they actually implement it though. After how they communicated this previously, I'm hesitant to get my hopes up.

"Please select the logos in order"

displays TWRP Logo, Lineage OS Logo, Nova Launcher Logo, and Fdroid Logo

no explanations or instructions

"Please complete this within 5 seconds"

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am concerned that they haven't explained how they're going to implement this for (and who counts as) experienced users.

I am also concerned that they have probably found a work around to get what they want while paying us lip service.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I suspect it will be you have to register and every month you press a button at midnight to have a shot at getting an unlock code.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What's the problem with side loading apps? It might mess up my own shit, that I bought and own, and can fuck up if I wish?

[–] henfredemars 10 points 3 days ago

That's the problem; handset makers don't believe you own the phone. They think it's their phone that you're paying to use temporarily.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because we, the techies, are a tiny minority. There are billions of comparatively clueless users who can apparently easily be scammed into installing malware. Governments and banks will be exerting significant pressure on Google to make their phones "secure", and they can actually threaten them. I don't see this as some grand conspiracy to destroy the hobbyist scene, Google just doesn't care about the individual.

There are billions of comparatively clueless users

It's worse than simply "doesn't bother with customizations", people these days just watch short-form videos algorithmically fed to them with zero interaction. These are my parents, WeChat short-videos, on loud speakers in the livingroom. You can hear it upstairs. Also, there are occasional horizontal videos they watch in portrait mode. The fuck? Who watches a landscape video in portait? 🀣

Boomers and Gen Alpha are actually quite similar (well my parents aren't "boomers", but they have boomer mindset)

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A one hour cooldown period, a scammer would not want to be on the phone with you for over an hour to try to wait for the timer to run out, and any experienced user will enable it when they very first get their phone, so won't have to ever deal with it again. LOL.

[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 8 points 3 days ago

That's not true. The YouTube scam baiters are on the phone with the same scammers for many hours

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Fuck it, make it 24 hours.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Does anyone have one of these phones https://linuxstans.com/linux-phone/ and can say anything about it?
Other Linuxphones would be fine by me as well :)

[rant]
I'm strongly feeling there's an end coming for using Android in the way I used to.
Google Play Integrity bullshit is putting the nail in the coffin, if killing F-Droid doesn't come first.
Too many lickspittle app developers cave to Google's monopoly.
Then again, I was able to grow up without a portable computer and while the world has changed quite a bit since that, I'm sure I can go back to that.
[/rant]

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They cave because the amount of people who sideload anything is a rounding error of users. Most just load from the Play store.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And what good is 'sideloading' (imo a loaded expression), if you can't use your phone the way you want because of the Google Play Integrity crap that fails on custom ROMs?
Btw. I don't think that the amount of F-Droid users are a rounding error, but I may be wrong.

[–] KuroiKaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Play integrity is likely created at the behest of banking and gov apps that are routinely attacked and frauded.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 2 days ago

Librem 5

Can't say much yet tho.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί