this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
79 points (98.8% liked)

Slop.

857 readers
393 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

providing services to the poor is inherently punishing the rich because giving the poor leverage to decide things about their lives removes that leverage from the rich

[–] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 18 points 6 days ago

Banger of a one-liner. Simple, accurate, insightful and explanatory.

gold-communist

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 33 points 6 days ago
[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why is it that as a poor person I'm supposed to care about billionaire's feelings when they'd rather me be dead???

[–] CupcakeOfSpice@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They don't want you dead! What about all that sweet wealth they can extract from your labor!

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But what about if I'm disabled or neuroatypical and accommodating my disabilit(y)(ies) would be marginally more costly than allowing me to die? soviet-hmm

[–] CupcakeOfSpice@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah yeah. I'm in that boat too. I guess in that case the Capitalist would prefer our death.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Last time I checked, better public infrastructure benefits all members of the public, regardless of class.

[–] KobaCumTribute@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago

The public transport, in its magnanimous equality, protects everyone, poor and rich alike, from driving their cybertrucks into a lake or crashing their private helicopters into hills.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 21 points 6 days ago
[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Punishing the rich is a service for the poor. sicko-pig

Socialism as a Service

[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They got me. My plan to force feed every rich person a full kilogram of pure saffron will probably require raising taxes again. It is a very expensive punishment, and using turmeric instead is simply not going to work.

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Food colour? It is less expensive.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

People treat "being rich" like an identity that you have no control over. You can just stop being rich if socialists are making your life harder. It's actually not difficult at all. Many people have done it by accident!

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 12 points 6 days ago

I've said it before: A Socialist is better at balancing the budget than the entire "fiscally conservative" the-republican party.

[–] gramxi@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago

por que no los dos?

[–] CrispyFern@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago

Get you a girl who can do both

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago

That is 100% a post written by AI, they fucking love this "it's not X it's Y" pattern.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Check back with me in about a decade, I’ll probably be so jaded and burnt by then I’ll take this offer.

I’ll eat sand in my bread if it means Bezos has to chew grit like me. Fuck it.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

Oh no, not the rich