this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

badposting

791 readers
284 users here now

badposting is a comm where you post badly


This is not a !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net alternative. This is not a !memes@hexbear.net alternative. This is a place for you to post your bad posts.

Ever had a really shitty bit idea? Joke you want to take way past the point of where it was funny? Want to feel like a stand-up comedy guy who's been bombing a set for the past 30 minutes straight and at this point is just saying shit to see if people react to it? Really bad pun? A homemade cringe concoction? A cognitohazard that you have birthed into this world and have an urge to spread like chain mail?


Rules:

  1. Do not post good posts.
    • Unauthorized goodposting is to be punished in the manner of commenting the phrase "GOOD post" followed by an emoji that has not yet been used in the thread
    • Use an emoticon/kaomoji/rule-three-abiding ASCII art if the rations run out
  2. This is not a comm where you direct people to other people's bad posts. This is a comm where you post badly.
  3. This rule intentionally left blank.
  4. If you're struck for rule 3, skill issue, not allowed to complain about it.

Code of Conduct applies just as much here as it does everywhere else. Technically, CoC violations are bad posts. On the other hand: L + ratio + get ~~better~~ worse material bozo

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

The Democrats

[–] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"I don't like minorities or woke (except the ones I know personally, they're alright), but I like the welfare state (except for when morally bad people get the benefits too)" is what basically every worker here in Europe agrees with outside of gentrified areas of big and/or student cities.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

Graham Platner

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Hmmm....so you mean nationalists, but they also believe in socialism

Nationalist socialism....has anyone ever tried this?

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago
[–] an_engel_on_earth@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

many aes states, in a way

[–] whiskers165@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

There are probably some fringe religious groups who's adherents might not describe themselves this way but absolutely are

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My brother is! He's also someone I'd describe as, "Not spiritual, but religious." He once described Germany's CDU as the closest thing to his politics.

My parents are conservative Catholics, but he was bullied by chuds in his formative years, so I think what happened is he latched on to the aspects of Catholicism that weren't consistent with mainstream chudism. Only, he also didn't get along with the libs (and leftists were super obscure) so he never came around on stuff like LGBT rights or, like, not being racist.

So the result is that he takes Catholic social responsibility teachings seriously, but it comes from a place of moral duty, like "noblesse oblige," and not from a place of liking or empathizing with the underprivileged.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

out of curiousity, does he seem really deeply committed to that? Like is it something he likes talking about or is he a legit charitable curmudgeon IRL?

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He's very particular and set in his beliefs, yeah. Once we were talking moral philosophy and I casually said I'm a consequentialist and he looked me dead in the eye and said, "I'm a deontologist" and nearly kicked me out of the house over that. It was kinda in the context of AES states where I wasn't really hiding my power level which probably contributed to everything.

I was sometimes able to speak his language because we're both nerds and kinda autistic and in some ways had similar experiences, but the word "trans" was just a bridge too far for him and we haven't really spoken since. Fortunately another living situation worked out afterwards but I was in a depressive funk for a while afterwards.

He doesn't get along with a lot of people and has frequently clashed with managers and coworkers (he works in tech), but he finally found a little town with a Catholic college where he can work remotely and fit in as well as he could anywhere.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Super interesting, thank you for sharing. I'm sorry to hear you hit an irreconcilable difference with him over trans stuff. I can imagine that was pretty fucking awful.

I wonder if he's happy, relatively speaking. Hopefully you are! soviet-heart

[–] Zuzak@hexbear.net 0 points 4 days ago
[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Damn wait until he finds out that consequentialism is just deontology phrased differently.

[–] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

Badposting aside, I remember reading somewhere that polling shows conservatives are quite fond of welfare policies as long as they only benefit white people so I guess that's them?

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

I see you haven't met my grandparents.

[–] Oskolki@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

How can someone be okay with exploitation and be considered socially progressive?

Long term plan of USA is literally to absorb everyone within it, by basically Darwinism, those who make it at the top are deemed worthy as rulers of the world. Like literally the end point of USA is one big World Government where everyone is the same and people are sorted into different groups based on their genetics. Eventually through Darwinism and Technological Advancement as well as assumed abundance of resources, they envision a Utopia where everyone is free to live the perfect life they choose, secured by a government that makes sure nobody interferes with each other in ways that break boundaries and cause irritation. It'll essentially be a world without workers, fully automated and enjoyable, without struggle.

And this is considered socially progressive.

There are only two reasons to oppose Liberals:

  1. You don't believe it'll work out.
  2. You don't want it to work out, you want the world to stay as it is.

If you sincerely believe in their ideals and goals you're essentially working towards a Utopia, anything can be justified for such a goal.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

o yea

GOOD post get-out

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago
[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

About 80% of GenX union members

Median Voter Ideology

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

This phenomenon is a lot more common in the global south, though I hesitate to call it "fiscally liberal" when that can just mean Mileiism.