804
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

House Speaker Mike Johnson has promised to release more than 44,000 hours of surveillance footage from Jan. 6 to the public, with one major caveat: The faces of some individuals who participated in the storming of the Capitol, a violent attempt to prevent the certification of Joe Biden’s election, will be blurred out.

In a press conference on Tuesday, Johnson said that “the release of the January 6 tapes is a critical and important exercise, we want transparency … we trust — House Republicans trust — the American people to draw their own conclusions.”

Johnson added that the party is going “through a methodical process of releasing them as quickly as we can” and that they “have to blur some of the faces of the persons who participated in the events of that day because we don’t want them to be retaliated against, and to be charged by the DOJ and to have other, you know, concerns and problems.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 134 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Republicans Are ~~Blurring the Faces of~~ Obstructing Justice So Capitol Rioters ~~so~~ They Won't Get Arrested

FTFY

[-] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

His office later noted that DOJ already has the raw footage.

and later in the article:

Johnson's spokesman suggested that the speaker was trying to keep the raw footage away from online sleuths who have helped identify hundreds of Capitol rioters and aided in the FBI's investigation.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/speaker-mike-johnson-says-blurring-jan-6-footage-rioters-dont-get-char-rcna128181

i.e. Let's not let the taxpayers aid law enforcement. Let's make the government spend taxpayer dollars when the public could help out.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Sounds like we're going to find Mike Johnson or people close to him financially in the mix.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 88 points 11 months ago

They're traitors tho. Why are you defending traitors hmmmmm???

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 48 points 11 months ago

Also I thought the troublemakers were Antifa? Why are they protecting Antifa?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

“But they’re PATRIOTS and SO AM I!!” -Johnson, maybe, who hasn’t learned to crack a dictionary

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago

Then all patriots are traitors

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spasmolytic@lemm.ee 83 points 11 months ago

It's either foolish or malicious to deliberately misrepresent the actions or motivations of these ass-hats just because they're ass-hats.

The DOJ already has unredacted footage and the blurring of faces is meant to avoid retaliation by "non-governmental actors", i.e. vigilantes, not to save anyone from arrest.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago

I disagree. These people broke the law in a serious way. There is no "light treason" when it comes to attempting to obstruct the public vote. We all should know who they are.

[-] Spasmolytic@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

There have already been well over 1,000 arrests, a few hundred sentenced, etc. (https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases) and you can look up names/details of those who've gone through due process. That's the system at work, like it or not. I don't think it's up to you or me to convict, or harass, or whatever else. You can maybe ID folks whose images are posted by the FBI requesting information from the public. I just hate to see crappy headlines and social media posts distorting what's happening when it seems pretty simple to verify through non-extreme media outlets.

I say this all with respect.

I hope everyone who gleefully rampaged around the capital gets what is legitimately coming to them.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I understand your point, and appreciate your respect too. If this were petty crime, e.g. shoplifting by some individuals, then I'd agree on keeping the video sealed until due process has, well, processed.

What do we do with several thousand people attacking the core of our democratic process? How do we keep historical accuracy for the future as well, we need to teach people what happened.

I'm conflicted, personally, because I'm glad our representatives see that they're not untouchable. Maybe it'll keep them interested in serving those ordinary citizens outside the vaunted halls of the capitol. On the other hand, I strongly disagree with the reasoning behind the traitors' attempt, and find both the timing and the method suspiciously well planned, by someone who I generally find despicable on multiple levels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

Is this the part where we start up the rumours again that Mike Johnson is anti-MAGA by trying to protect the FBI from Trump vigilantes by only blurring out the faces of informants, and just seeing what happens? Chaos for the sake of chaos?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Some of the IDs and arrest happened because people identified the person and reported them. And that's just from media footages.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 months ago

The guy literally said it was to stop the DOJ from charging them. It's in the quote in the original post.

Why would a self-proclaimed patriot be against charging literal insurrectionists?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right?

Sometimes hypocrisy is reason enough, but deterrence is good too

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Senal@programming.dev 16 points 11 months ago

you mean the faces that are already posted by the FBI for everyone to see ?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] massacre@lemmy.world 75 points 11 months ago

Which is it? A "peaceful protest by MAGA infiltratded by A Deep State/BLM/Antifa instigating a sedicious Riot" or "Need to blur faces to protect from the non-government retaliation". If it's the former, surely the GOP would not desire protection of the latter.

Or should I just now start saying that the GOP led Congress is protecting Antifa/Deep State/BLM traitors? I'mma run with that one....

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 28 points 11 months ago

GOP double think is nothing new. Guns can't be regulated or considered dangerous, but books must be banned.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] penquin@lemm.ee 59 points 11 months ago

I'm relatively new to this country, has it been always a joke like this? Politics are fucking hilarious here. Wtf is going on?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Where are you from? From what I gather (not American) after Obama won the right went ape shit.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 14 points 11 months ago

Also not American, and from what I gathered I think Nixon and the Bushes also contributed a lot to the enshitification of the USA.

[-] Emotional_Sandwich@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

And that fuck strain Ronald Reagan

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

no definitely not

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

we're just getting ready to fight the Civil War all over again

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I hope we learned from the first one and be harsher on the losers. I think it was Sumner or Stevens that wanted land redistribution to freed slaves and military rule and treating the south as conquered territory.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Well we don’t want the criminals to be charged, and have problems! Jeez!

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 11 months ago

Just wait. It'll stop being funny soon enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Then arrest the entire GOP.

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago

Isn't it obstruction of justice to hide evidence of crimes being committed?

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

And isn't this pretty explicitly evidence tampering?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 28 points 11 months ago

So, he's literally saying that it was a criminal act?

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

What a complete fucking buffoon. Where’s the transparency in blurring the guilty parties?

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

He's a Christofascist. Every fucking word out of his mouth is self-serving bullshit as a matter of course and should be disregarded as having been said in bad faith.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago

Faces have been blurred to protect the guilty.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Johnson says the J6 committee was a partisan action and that the Republicans on the committee were following some other agenda. Therefore, the Republican party is a criminal conspiracy to commit treason against the United States.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

"We want to conceal evidence of a crime"

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

I’m no legal expert but could this be construed as aiding and abetting criminals?

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Isn’t this giving succor to an enemy?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] theodewere@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

the same ones who ran like little girls while the traitors took a shit on the entire history of our Republic.. are those the Republicans who are blurring the faces of their criminal help? i hope they catch you assholes next time..

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 10 points 11 months ago

Wait, wouldn't any tapes the congress have also already be in the hands of the FBI/DOJ? If not, where are the Republicans getting the videos from?

[-] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 months ago

The DOJ definitely has the raw footage already. This is equal parts publicity stunt and trying to keep internet sleuths from getting too involved.

[-] Zoidberg@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

That coming from the same party that supports a guy who is famous for doxing people he wants to see in trouble.

Assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
804 points (97.4% liked)

News

23287 readers
3739 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS