oce

Just so I know if my time will be well used to redact an answer, what's your affinity with lemmy.ml, hexbear and lemmygrad?

Living conditions have improved for the majority but the current leader (13 years) has increased autocracy, further reduced freedoms, continued oppressing Uyghurs and Hong Kong and increased the threat on Taiwan.

Non, c'est juste l'effet habituel du sel en pâtisserie. Je pense que celles d'Okinawa sont introuvables en dehors du Japon, mais peut-être des cousines Américaines (l'origine) ou Chinoises.

I couldn't find any reliable source, but the most convincing idea I read was to reduce contrast and glare issues between the white chalk and its background. The green would reflect more light than the black, reducing the contrast and the glare. Also, the original blackboards were made of black slate, but then they became synthetic which made it easier to change the color.

Scarcisoft?

I wanted robots to do my chores but instead they are taking my job and my hobbies! Hopefully they become addicted to gaming and don't to take my job anymore.

C'est de l'humour noir donc ça rigole de choses graves. Entre un truc juste con et un truc infréquentable il y a une marge quand même.

Parce que ça touche le côté qui te tient à coeur? Si c'était sur Macron ça t'aurai choqué ? Si on fait la statistique des cibles de Charlie, ça m'étonnerait beaucoup que les figures de gauche soient devant par rapport à la droite.

I'm using the froze and thaw technique to remove more water, but it's still a hassle.

Why do you think this paper is more correct than the other? This paper seems to be locked on a single definition and says everything else is wrong because it does not follow this definition.

Personally, I find it very intellectually unsatisfying because you can have a individual with male gametes but with a female phenotype, and this definition says, this individual's sex is without a doubt 100% male. It seems the main benefit is not questioning a historical definition, which fits well with conservative opinions. There's clear evidence on many other subjects that this can slow down or block science (ex: tobacco, climate).

Consider some of those people are trying to do that for rational reasons and check the article as an example of such reasons.

I feel there's some marketing conspiracy with the "office" term. It looks like they have been planning to make it disappear because it is uncool for some new marketing genius or it reduces the target markets, I guess. So they first attached a new term, 365, as a transition, and now they dropped the office while keeping the 365 so recent users can still make the link.
The AI bubble was maybe just a convenient excuse to advance the plan.
Plus, since post-covid, return to office is very unpopular, how convenient!
The plot thickens.