this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
664 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

20177 readers
1689 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 81 points 1 month ago

No wonder it feels more crowded

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This helps explain why days seem shorter as we age, the Earth is spinning faster due to the conservation of angular momentum. The days are literally shorter.

[–] sga@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

fun fact, days have actually been getting longer pretty much since formation of earth (well moon to be correct). reason iirc is that moon is slowly moving away from earth, and this results in some dynamics changing and as a result earth spins slower. like billions of years ago, it was closer to 23 hours.

ps - very rusty memory right now, should have skipped writing instead of half borked fact

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good to know it’s still a flat disc

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bottleofchips@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well that’s what happens when you leave it out in the sun

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No I think it's because it's cold in space

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago
[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

There was shrinkage!

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

By the way, speaking of changed colours of planets: if you haven't been keeping up with the latest news in space imagery and want a real mindbender, check out what has recently happened to Neptune. You may have been thinking, ooooh, what an enthralling blue planet! - bzzzzzt, turns out it's a pretty bland and boring gas giant, the colours were exaggerated on purpose because otherwise you can't see shit.

[–] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

I like the pale blue representation, reminds me of blue jade or some old seaglass.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This truly is the worst timeline. Next, they'll tell us Uranus isn't gassy too.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Nah, it is. Just checked.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Most ~~planets~~ galaxies are like this I believe

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Nebulae especially.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Second picture looks smogier and more polluted

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well the second pic is also at night with a high iso and long exposure plus it's digiral so there's a lot more noise going on.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Speaking in generic terms, film is way more forgiving of over exposure and digital is way more forgiving of under exposure. A fast lens is always king, but once you hit parity on that I would personally take digital for low light any day.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Copy that, my knowledge of the specifics of digital vs analog is about exhausted just from what i posted so i appreciate the added information!

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 24 points 1 month ago

The maps were correct, New Zealand doesn’t exist.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I like how you can see the ring/sphere of atmosphere in the new image.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That’s the new smog layer.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

To be fair there was a big hole in the ozone in 1970

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's because the Sun is behind it.

[–] the_citizen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

It's getting old, I guess /s

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The magnetic poles must be moving substantially. Africa has rotated almost 90 degrees in a few short decades!

The blue Marble was also photographed "upside down." We tend to rotate it because the shape of Africa is apparent and familiar. The new shot is taken further West and I think closer to the planet so not as much of its surface is visible.

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Android post processing vs Apple post processing

[–] DanVctr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Went back and looked, actually laughed out loud

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Also looks much more sickly (yes, its because they pumped up the brightness lol)

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Where did Africa go?? 😧

[–] psud@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aside from all else, the first image was taken on film lit by daylight, the second was shot on digital at high ISO lit by moonlight with a little sunlight at one edge

Moonlight doesn't have the same colour rendering quality as sunlight

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Thanks for the info, that's awesome! Based on the quality of the image, I'd guess this was a specialized camera designed to have a broader range of sensitivity. Do you know if that's right or did they just use a nice DSLR?

Also, the first image has been corrected for rayleigh scattering, either algorithmically or artistically. The second image does not appear to have been corrected. It looks similar to what we get from geostationary satellites prior to performing rayleigh scattering correction.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] postscarce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Proof that global warming is not real!!!! Read your science… if something gets HOTTER it EXPANDS!!! Those scientist cucks have cucked themselves good this time!!!!

/s (in case it’s needed)

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's because we're looking at a different side of the planet in the second photo.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Completely different landmasses as well!

Kubrick, we're onto you

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

A lot less green, as well.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Big if true.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Plus, that 2d image makes it look flat, like a penny.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Ha! I knew the Earth was flat!"

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 1 month ago

Knowledge is power!

[–] polydactyl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Jerryyyy, Earth is a planet!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That's because the internet made the world smaller.

[–] the_beber@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

It‘s like that one planet in SMG.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Its all the fracking

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

continents seem to have moved too.. weird.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's because the Apollo mission photos were obviously faked. How would they have known how small Earth really is, duh!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›