this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
404 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21181 readers
499 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bot@sub.community 1 points 6 days ago

I miss BlackBerry

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 148 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Why in the everliving fuck would NASA put ANYTHING Microsoft into a spacecraft?

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago

Because Gates fucked Children with the President on Epstein’s Island…

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's almost as if this bullshit project was just pork barrelling for overpriced contracts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The entire craft is built by giant US legacy corporations. Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, etc. Microsoft is just one more in the pile.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your laptop is built by "legacy corporations, " but if you put Linux on it, it works better.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm going to sound super stupid but w/e.

What happens to all your files when you install Linux?

It's just basically a GUI, right so does Linux create its own space and ignore what's there?

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

All operating systems we tend to use have filesystems. A filesystem is a methodology for writing data in a way that the OS can read. Windows included.

When you install a new OS, such as linux, you must choose how to allocate your disk space. You can use the whole disk - which would format and rewrite the system to be compatible with the flavor of linux you chose - or you can reallocate space on the drive if you have enough. This will move around the available free space, create the filesystem I just mentioned on that free space you designated, and leave your old windows files intact.

You can now interact with these from the Linux side with the right commands (mounting the windows partition and gaining access). You could even "dual boot," which would allow you to choose which OS you want to go to at startup.

I've HIGHLY simplified this since it's just a quick explanation, but that's the gist of it. There are obviously more scenarios, pitfalls, etc.

When I was first starting out in like 1996 or 1997, I was running FreeBSD 2.2.2. I accidentally wiped my system so many times that I stopped caring what got lost. It took me a while before I understood what the hell I was doing. Poring over man pages and instructions to figure it out.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Windows and Linux are like an operators in a warehouse. Windows knows some ways to store stuff and keep track of what is stores, Linux knows some ways too. Sometimes the way they store stuff overlaps, sometimes it doesn't. If you put Linux into a warehouse that Windows operated, by default, Linux will be able to find boxes and stuff, but the Windows operator has some small tricks up their sleeve to make it harder, and of course Windows has kept it a secret.

If you want to find all your boxes in a Windows warehouse and continue using the warehouse without being afraid of squishing a small box with a big one because the piece of paper Windows uses has some secret handwriting that was misinterpreted for "there's no box here", it's better to take out all the boxes, let Linux setup it's storage system, and then put the boxes back in.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So backup and restore into Linux what I can.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago

They are going to space to seed the cloud

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Personal devices running Outlook should be rapidly deorbited

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You would think that Microsoft would be like this is going to space. Let's pull out all the stops. But no, it's the same corporate crap!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 110 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Space Force TV show continues to fulfill the prophecy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If only there were low-bandwidth, straight-forward, well tested email clients.....

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

low-bandwidth,

They're on a 600Mbps connection, bandwidth isn't the problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"NASA says they'll remotely connect to the computer to see what the problem is."

'Hello, this is your NASA certified Microsoft certied tech support, you need to send us gift cards to unblock your computer"

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

DOOOOO NOOOT REDEEEM!

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

Kitboga is the best

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 week ago

Also known as "nominal outlook performance"

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You would think that the absolute basic, minimum requirement for taking something on a space mission is that it complies with open standards.

If you have standards compliant programs, it's easy to set up a back-up client in case the primary doesn't work. If your email is "Outlook" and you are tied to the outlook server and something breaks, there's your single point of failure. Sucks to be you.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What if the problem is server side

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What if the problem is DNS

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine being literally off the planet and still be expected to check your work email.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I mean if you are on a work trip it is pretty standard

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gotta submit their timesheets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It seems you have problems with running your multi billion dollar rocket. Would you like me to help you with that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The rare occasion when "It's not rocket science!" means it's harder.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago
[–] silver@das-eck.haus 17 points 1 week ago

Wtf do they need email for in space

This is just… so perfectly emblematic of where we are as a society.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Who the f permits taking unverified software on a space trip?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

In space, no one can hear you call tech support.

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they rely on microsoft?!?

holy shit, and here i thought the job is dangerous as is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would you not use internal NASA programmed software? Oh wait, we're beyond that now, we just ask Claude to vomit up a mess from its exabytes of source code and vibe our way to the Moon!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They say Microslop CoPilot is already on the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app 8 points 1 week ago

See? They're just like us!

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Apollo 13 movie sequel will be wild...

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trying to imagine Jim Lovell's reaction when Apollo 13 blue-screens and has to reboot. What an amateurish shitshow NASA has become.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let this be a lesson about putting windows OS on space equipment.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Let this be a lesson about putting it anywhere.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

So they're not only using Microslop in offices, but also on space missions...? Gee, I wonder why they've been failing to return to the Moon for 50 years...

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Microsoft, because sucking only on one planet isn't enough..

[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What a surprise. Microslop

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Have they tried unplugging it and plugging it back in?

load more comments
view more: next ›