this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
404 points (98.1% liked)

Not The Onion

21787 readers
2061 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 148 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Why in the everliving fuck would NASA put ANYTHING Microsoft into a spacecraft?

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 82 points 2 months ago

Because Gates fucked Children with the President on Epstein’s Island…

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's almost as if this bullshit project was just pork barrelling for overpriced contracts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The entire craft is built by giant US legacy corporations. Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, etc. Microsoft is just one more in the pile.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Your laptop is built by "legacy corporations, " but if you put Linux on it, it works better.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago

They are going to space to seed the cloud

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Personal devices running Outlook should be rapidly deorbited

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You would think that Microsoft would be like this is going to space. Let's pull out all the stops. But no, it's the same corporate crap!

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And of all things, an email client?? What the fuck are they doing?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 110 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Space Force TV show continues to fulfill the prophecy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If only there were low-bandwidth, straight-forward, well tested email clients.....

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

low-bandwidth,

They're on a 600Mbps connection, bandwidth isn't the problem.

[–] Darohan@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Bro what do you mean the moon mission has faster internet than me? 😭

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 72 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"NASA says they'll remotely connect to the computer to see what the problem is."

'Hello, this is your NASA certified Microsoft certied tech support, you need to send us gift cards to unblock your computer"

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

DOOOOO NOOOT REDEEEM!

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago

Kitboga is the best

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 months ago

Also known as "nominal outlook performance"

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You would think that the absolute basic, minimum requirement for taking something on a space mission is that it complies with open standards.

If you have standards compliant programs, it's easy to set up a back-up client in case the primary doesn't work. If your email is "Outlook" and you are tied to the outlook server and something breaks, there's your single point of failure. Sucks to be you.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

What if the problem is server side

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What if the problem is DNS

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's impossible. They don't even have that in space.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Haha yeah, I use outlook at work as a webpage in LibreWolf in Linux, so even with open stuff on my local hardware I can definitely still have outlook issues.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Imagine being literally off the planet and still be expected to check your work email.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I mean if you are on a work trip it is pretty standard

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Gotta submit their timesheets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It seems you have problems with running your multi billion dollar rocket. Would you like me to help you with that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The rare occasion when "It's not rocket science!" means it's harder.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago
[–] silver@das-eck.haus 17 points 2 months ago

Wtf do they need email for in space

This is just… so perfectly emblematic of where we are as a society.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Who the f permits taking unverified software on a space trip?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 15 points 2 months ago

In space, no one can hear you call tech support.

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they rely on microsoft?!?

holy shit, and here i thought the job is dangerous as is.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you imagine if Copilot fucks up the mission

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

ai and microsoft. it's like a entshittyfication bingo. chivers down my spine.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would you not use internal NASA programmed software? Oh wait, we're beyond that now, we just ask Claude to vomit up a mess from its exabytes of source code and vibe our way to the Moon!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They say Microslop CoPilot is already on the case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app 8 points 2 months ago

See? They're just like us!

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The Apollo 13 movie sequel will be wild...

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trying to imagine Jim Lovell's reaction when Apollo 13 blue-screens and has to reboot. What an amateurish shitshow NASA has become.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Let this be a lesson about putting windows OS on space equipment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

So they're not only using Microslop in offices, but also on space missions...? Gee, I wonder why they've been failing to return to the Moon for 50 years...

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Microsoft, because sucking only on one planet isn't enough..

[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

What a surprise. Microslop

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Have they tried unplugging it and plugging it back in?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

embarrassing.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

screw outlook? WTF where is thunderbird when you need it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Shoulda installed Thunderbird

load more comments
view more: next ›