this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
458 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7272 readers
1710 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That isn't a fair comparison. Winrar has been here for decades, while OpenAI is relative new. Give OpenAI 2 decades of time and we can then see it loss 5 trillion dollar.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 40 points 2 months ago

That isn't a fair comparison, WinRAR actually provides value to its users.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fewer people have been driven to suicide by WinRar

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Not sure if the same applies to WinZip though.

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well maybe OpenAI has only made 0 dollars now. But, give it a few years and its sure to make at least $000,000,000,000.00.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Maybe if you put a minus in front of that!

David Caruso face, and jabs sunglasses arm into tear duct

[–] omarthemediocre@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

To be honest I am more profitable than OpenAI. My salary covers my expanses and I still have some money left at the end of the month. Can Sam Altman say the same about OpenAI?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you also give hallucinated bad advice for free, or is that a subscription service?

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's free, but I might start including ads in my hallucinations soon

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I can't wait for it to start hallucinating ads

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Totally understandable. You gotta keep up with the enshittification.

[–] conartistpanda@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How about ads to get you to NOT buy something, like advertising a FOSS app.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 2 months ago

He's getting paid in exposure.

[–] King_Bob_IV@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sam's Altman can definitely say that his salary covers his expenses and that he has money left over at the end of the month. Open AI has been very profitable for him. It's just not profitable as a company.

[–] omarthemediocre@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, Sam is fine, he has always been good at grifting ever since he sold that useless app of tracking friends

[–] LordDaveTheKind@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

WinRAR sells a successful and effective product to companies. AFAIK, their main business is B2B.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do they sell? WinRaR is not a good application

[–] LordDaveTheKind@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can name 2 o 3 corpos (big ones) who regularly renew their WinRAR license. And that repays it abundantly.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

This is how I want things to work. Big Commercial use needs to pay, everyone else get for free, and open source.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago

I thought you were trolling or the it team at those companies were trolling. But dam winrar still has a huge user base and still gets updates.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Winrar never made me go crazy and kill myself

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I really love desktop applications. They do their job, you install it and it's done. And you can work towards next version and such while people can decide to not upgrade.

Now everything is cloud, they only maintain one version, they can change it whenever, you can't get any say, and have to always agree on their policies. And have Internet connection.

If I could make money making desktop applications, I would love that job. Everything is web and AI now

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everything is cloud = everything is someone else's computer

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

...means everything is subscription

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not only more profitable, but more valuable as well. Not that it's particularly valuable.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Perhaps you meant useful

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The time I put some money to see how options worked and lost it all was more profitable than OpenAI. I only lost some $300.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I considered sharing my own choices that led to lost money, while still more profitable than OpenAI...but there are just too many.

Edit: Here's one - that time Homer Simpson bought a mint condition copy of Amazing Fantasy #15, and then ate it - was still more profitable than OpenAI.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did they ever found that guy that bought that WinRAR license? It's one of a kind and must be worth a lot more now.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm that guy, or i was like 25 years ago!

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am also that guy, and it was more like 17 years ago.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Dang! Two exist! That lowers the value, still significant more than a trump nft

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

The Metaverse ~~is~~ was more profitable than OpenAI. Pets.com was more profitable than OpenAI.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I'm more profitable than OpenAI. Just me, working my shitty, dead end job.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I really wonder how many people pay for LLMs. I used to have my company pay for one product but that was company money. hard for me to believe I would've ever spent my own money on that. Unless it was $20 a year instead of $100, I guess then maybe I would have. I think the fact that every tech company is cramming LLMs for free into every product is a sign that most people wouldn't pay for them.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I also wonder who's actually willing to pay for this shit. Even with ai generated 'art' unless you need large volumes, it's probably cheaper to just go on fiver and hire a real artist to make something for you

[–] naught101@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

WinRAR = 1$

OpenAI = 0$