this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
311 points (96.4% liked)

Science Memes

19622 readers
1069 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Why would do this?

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

This image is cropped so poorly. I've seen the uncropped version recently too...

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

I need to find this waffle iron!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

How about 25?

|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
| | | | | |
[–] shane@feddit.nl 1 points 17 hours ago

If you look at the image on the left you'll see that 5 of the smaller squares won't fit in the big one.

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except the 17 square version holds less syrup than the 16 square version because you need to reduce the size of the squares to fit more of them.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 2 points 15 hours ago

You can take this to the limit and make a waffle with infinitely many holes, each infinitely small !

It's just crepes.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you're measuring side length and not area.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh hey sorry I didn't know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I should put "Bachelor's in Waffleology" on my resume

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Keep it up and you'll be the next Waffle King!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 day ago

I will put you to work testing this theory.

Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I'll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Why even have a waffle at all, let's drink the syrup!

[–] bumblefumble@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Fine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Give this man a medal

For those who didn't know you can just pour as much syrup as you like, regardless of the square count.

[–] stan_stanminson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Why we don't make one giant square to hold even more syrup?

Or - here's a radical idea -

EAT A SECOND FUCKING WAFFLE

[–] ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

This goes to 17 sqares!

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

can make it round so the syrup spreads more evenly from the center.

Oops you made pancakes

Because then it gets too soggy in the middle. The magic of the waffle is that the tops of the square dividers stay mostly dry until you start cutting into them. So you get freshly syruped waffle throughout the eating process.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

What you want is infinite squares, so you get infinite crispy edges

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I keep telling people that you can make nice, even months if you just have 13 of them but nooooo, 13 is a prime number, you can't divide it by 2, 3, 4, or 6! Boo fucking hoo, I want every month in the year to start on the same day of the week.

[–] ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't add up, either. Plus, you still have leap years and seconds.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes it does. 13 even months with one extra day for new years

[–] ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 18 hours ago

You tack the extra time on the end, shifting what day of the week the 1st falls on for the rest of the year. Instead of the end of February, which is just the most random fucking choice that I can only figure was determined because the calendar was set centuries before we had lightbulbs.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

you haven't looked at the calendar. it works.

[–] thessnake03@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Found Henry Ford's account

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

365/13 is 28.07 - what are you doing with the extra day? + leap years too

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The last month is 1 day longer (or 2 on a leap year) which resets the sequence. So exactly 4 weeks per month until the end, then new years has a buffer day.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 18 hours ago

Lol, you've got my vote

[–] palmtrees2309@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Aren't Hexagons the bestagon for tiling a plane for most holding capacity while reducing the "walls" than any shape?

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

This here is just the best known solution to packing 17 squares specifically

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This was my first thought.

A circle filled with hexagons!

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

The honeycomb theorem is actually better than that: there isn't any way to divide up the plane with equal-area shapes (even if it's not a tiling in the sense of having any pattern) it won't be better than hexagons.

But that video can die in a fire!

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I wonder if John Bidwell is haunted by his discovery. I know I would be. That shit is cursed as fuck.

[–] unnamedau@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

on one hand, i want a 17-square waffle maker. on the other hand i think i would get brutally murdered by anyone i ever tried to make waffles for

If they don't appreciate the 17-square waffle, they don't deserve it.

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TIL the shape in waffle is to hold syrup.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It holds blueberries very well too!

[–] enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if the bottom part of the waffle is the inverted shape of the top one, it should fit another waffle. To properly stack them

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

But it's not, so you need blueberries to be able to stack waffles reliably.

[–] kozy138@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Shapes are dumb.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

This ruined my day.

load more comments
view more: next ›