this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
44 points (89.3% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8908 readers
258 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Perhaps it should be named "unconventional opinions that I still agree with"? Or perhaps "lol lets see what opinion they post now" (to be fair, the WHY ARE YOU BOOING ME? I'M RIGHT is sort of this)?

People are just upvoting and downvoting what they agree and disagree with, so it basically comes off as a trap to get things to laugh at - which it isn't even good at. Should people not be voting on "yes, this is something that is genuinely unpopular"?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 8 hours ago

The voting guidelines are an attempt to encourage actual unpopular opinions to "rise to the top", so to speak, as that is the purpose of the community. Obvious troll (or other rule-violating) posts should be reported rather than just downvoted, but we kind of expected people to embrace the spirit of the community. While many do, there are several problems with this approach:

  1. As others have stated, people just knee-jerk to the downvote button when they see something they disagree with
  2. 80% or more of the people on this platform don't bother to read the sidebar rules for any community
  3. Muscle memory

We put out a poll a while back asking if the voting guidelines should be changed, but there was no majority in favor of it, so they remain the same.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I see the down voting more often as a method of saying "this is a troll" or "this opinion is unpopular because it is evil/ makes no sense". I've seen plenty of unpopular opinions that have decent ratios while genuinely being unpopular.

I think it's similar to how the right wing views the first amendment in the US. You can say whatever you want that's unpopular. Noone is stopping you. But that doesn't mean that you're entitled to upvotes for being a bigot or troll just because it technically fits the subject of the sub.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 hours ago

The only unpopular opinions I have seen downvoted to hell (recently at least) have been objective facts that were incorrect. Saying your opinion is [thing that is untrue] should still go into a black hole.

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 15 points 7 hours ago

I thought unpopular opinion meant: „I feel a bit alone with my opinion on xyz, is there someone who shares this opinion?“ I think it shouldn’t mean: „Here is my completely unhinged take on xyz that would get me banished from my community if I ever said it out loud“.

So imho it’s expected to stumble unpon people that agree with you.

It should be for „ I think socks in sandals are cute.“ and not „Hitler was a great guy and did nothing wrong.“

[–] DavidGA@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is an extremely popular opinion.

[–] Speiser0@feddit.org 4 points 7 hours ago

I agree, hence I've downvoted.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 19 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

People don't check the channel when it's in their timeline. They treat it like a regular post and they vote on it like they always do.

This requires some redesign of the way the channel is treated to make it work.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 hours ago

Exactly.

It's the same for other communities also.
Have e.g. seen a lot of unexpected downvotes for legit dull posts on Dull Men's Club.

Would perhaps help if the community name would be displayed more prominently.

On the other hand, the community names sometimes don't mirror the description or content of the community.
So it's complicated...

Perhaps count votes from actual community members seperatly from the rest?

[–] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Good point, maybe better design could help address it.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

[Unpop] Just require post tags.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

I've not seen someone use such wrong words to describe part of the website they're on before. "channel" and "timeline"? What?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Upvotes/downvotes dont matter on this site. Its not like reddit where downvotes limit how much you can comment and upvotes are required to participate in communities.

Its dumb that people cant upvote opinoins they disagree with but it is what it is. Maybe the OP should post a comment saying Agree and a comment saying disagree so only the people who bothered to open the thread can vote.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

They still effect visibility under most post sorting options, lower scored things display lower. Matters in a minor way for scrolling through the subscribed feed.

[–] kindnesskills@literature.cafe 9 points 10 hours ago

Heres my opinion: Votes doesn't matter, it merely inhibits conversation when we can express your reaction to a post with a click of a button instead of explaining our own thoughts on the matter.

Just post what you want to post and try to avoid looking at the number, or go over to an app or instance that doesn't show votes, or allows you to select your own settings for votes, or only shows upvotes.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

I upvoted this not because you are correct but because you care about votes. Least popular thing I can think of. Nice job.

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

Do you only do things for imaginary upvotes?

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

People vote on what should gain more visibility, or less. So if your point is well created and somewhat heinous in nature, people down vote as to keep your opinion from spreading. If your opinion is true even if unpopular, I wager it will gain visibility. Even divisive opinions will gain visibility due to discussion.

[–] TheObviousSolution@thebrainbin.org -2 points 10 hours ago
  • Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow 🩹

You are describing something else.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Lemmy is different from Reddit. On Reddit you get pushed content to keep you busy. On Lemmy you just get the most active and new content. So I'm guessing a lot of people just get these posts in their feed without even being subscribed to this community.

[–] lath@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago

It can get mixed up. People can upvote their agreement with the sentiment that it's unpopular or the agreement with the opinion itself. It makes the arrow system unreliable because you can't be sure they see it as choosing between agreeing with the opinion and agreeing with its unpopularity.

You realize the votes are meaningless, correct? It's ok to get downvoted, the internet is not real life. This is an opportunity to stop taking yourself and the internet so seriously.

[–] username_1@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

People hate hearing opinions that don't fit in their comfort bubble. And most are unwilling (some are even incapable) to understand those opinions.
Luckily those arrows don't matter here.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 hours ago

Luckily those arrows don't matter here.

But they do.

Many forms of display ranking are based on that.

For the Unpopular Opinion community that would e.g. mean that the best (so: unpopular) posts are shown further down, while the top posts are filled with stuff not fitting the community's purpose.

[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago

no, you're wrong

They may not matter, but I understand some platforms, like piefed, are trying to change this. If they don't matter, shouldn't the rules just say to look at downvotes to determine the really unpopular opinions?