wizardbeard

joined 2 years ago
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago) (1 children)

Some important context on this user before anyone else gets dragged into a discussion: check their post history, multiple to a "Youth Liberation" community.

No shade meant by calling it out, but I think that makes it much more clear how strong your opinions are on this. There's nothing to be gained in trying to talk to you about this when your opinions are set so strongly. You aren't going to see the dangers that the rest of us see because your focus is on allowing freedom from oppresive parental figures.

Edit: they also "won't give an inch on this"

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago) (1 children)

Teens and children, and the pushback you're seeing is because a lot of people, even terminally online people, believe that limiting or preventing children (and teens) from accessing social media as they currently exist is part of making that happen.

You have to slow the bleeding first. You can't just ignore the broken leg and start physical therapy.

Teens vary wildly in maturity and are likely to be unfortunately caught up in rules for children. There's no easy cutoff age before 18 for when one can be trusted to be online without guard rails. I can speak from experience that teens will find a way whether its legal or not, so I'm not really super concerned about the ones who need access. They'll find a way.

And for every person like you that says they are still alive because of unrestricted internet, there's another one who is dead because of it. 4chan, tumblr, reddit even (remember when they "totally figured out the boston bomber"?), and more direct cyberbullying all claim lives. There were 3 suicides in my highschool growing up, two determined to be cyberbullying caused and the third just rumored. I almost lost one of my younger cousins to cyberbullying as well.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Decade and a half ago I torrented all the time and didn't get caught until I stupidly downloaded something from the top 100 torrents on pirate bay.

Not sure how safe torrents are now.

Never have had any issues with direct downloads and streaming. Just use your head, adblock, and virus scan your downloads (knowing that keygens or cracked exes may show as viruses).

For safest option and free: Use an up to date web browser with a good adblocker (ublock origin is the current best), stick to direct downloads using a download manager to manage the 12+ parts, and virus scan everything that you download. Download from trusted sites from the megathread. Direct download is generally safe, unless you live in one of the few countries cracking down on fitgirl repacks specifically. Then that site is off limits for you.

You can use torrents without a VPN, it's just not safe. You could be caught and the penalty will vary based off of what you're downloading, where you live, and who you use for an ISP.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago

Lol, this made a great combo on my feed with an article about a current zero-click RCE vuln it has:

Lemmy Post

Article

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Most 365 mail admin work doesn't end up touching the routing stuff, domains, or DNS records too often, so I'm by no means an expert. Last year I got rid of the last on-prem exchange servers in our environment. Here are my thoughts anyway, for what its worth.

At my workplace, domain as internal relay was used as part of our hybrid exchange setup, where we still had an on-prem exchange server largely for recipient management (for stuff connected to AD objects and thus mastered on-prem instead of in the cloud) and for a mail relay for internal recipients so that automated emails coming from legacy systems bypassed all filtering. I'm not familiar with other use cases.


Stuff that may not apply (minimize the lift)

I would approach this by using it as an opportunity to raze those hundreds of redirects. Surely the recieving systems have other ways to categorize incoming email than destination address. Stuff like system to system you could probably add shit in the body text and change the filters on the recieving end. So each external system would only have one destination address. That's ideal world though and probably touches a lot of shit outside your control.

Second thing is that I would look into setting the destination email addresses directly in the sending system. It takes management out of your hands, but why does any of this need to hit your infra in the first place? Again, that's ideal world and also probably touches shit you don't control.

Point is, I'd look to minimize how many of these things you actually have to deal with, because they'll just keep being a problem and a pain in the ass to manage forever otherwise. That's the real underlying problem, if you can do anything about it.


Stuff that more directly lines up with your ask:

If you can script routing rules you can probably figure out scripting the creation of contact objects in 365, and export of them to csv for verification.

PowerShell is going to be your friend with Exchange Online/365, and most things Microsoft. Exchange Online has a dedicated module (think library if you're used to terminology for other languages).

You can make a csv with the internal email address, external destination address, internal contact name, display name, and whether or not it's hidden from the address book (do end users need to send to it?). I'd reccomend using some clear prefix in the internal name to keep them obvious compared to any other contacts not related to this fuckery.

You could use full mailboxes and forwarding rules on each one but that increases complexity significantly.

In PowerShell, you'd connect to exchange, import the csv, then foreach over the csv contents throwing the values from it into New-MailContact.

If you want to be fancy you could wrap New-MailContact in a try/catch to spit failed ones out into an array and export that back to csv at the end for review.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Awesome! A grocery store opened within biking distance from me this winter and I've been considering something like this for grocery runs. I'll check out the playlist over the next few days.

What improvements are you considering?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago

While the ID shit is godawful, that's not at all how it works in any implementation out there right now. There have even been multiple breaches of these systems, further demonstrating their issues, but you know what hasn't been in any of the breaches/leaks?

Direct connection between ID and uniquely identifiable user information.

If I'm wrong about this I'd love to know, but as far as I am aware the ID leaks have not had shit like email address attached.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

That's the point, it doesn't. Much like the argument about targeting marginalized people when you're talking about children.

Edit: Yes, there are plenty of children and teens without access to information and the support structures they should have IRL. I was one of them and it's fucking awful. The internet can help with that by offering exposure to different ideologies, evidence that you aren't alone in what you're feeling or going through.

But I don't look back on everything I did and encountered online in mid 00s - early 10s era internet and go "that was overwhelmingly a great thing that I should have had the sort of unrestricted access to that I did". And the internet has been even more corporatized and "skinner-boxed" since.

And with the benefit of hindsight, I can see a bunch of other ways that I could have gotten the good I got from the internet without all the bad, and through things in real life that I had dismissed in my youth.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

If you watch a decent amount of twitch streaming it's pretty obvious. I'm sure there are a ton of whales out there willing to dump >$1000 in one go on a streamer, but just watch something like a "subathon", or a "hype train". You'll see more dollars than viewers they have move around in the span of like 30 minutes.

Or when streamers "bet" each other large amounts of gift subscriptions. That's explicitly money, and abstracting it behind subs only masks how damn much a lot of these "bets" are really for.

I'm not going to claim that anywhere near all of it is straight laundering, but it's pretty damn obvious just how fucking easy it would be to use it all for washing/tumbling of dirty funds.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Sonic Adventure has such a good soundtrack.

It's a shame most people only know it for the "lol funny jank" and lump it in with "all 3d sonic sucks". It was an early 3d game trying to do a shit ton of stuff that few other games tried for a number of years later. Not all of it worked out well, but it's a wonderful slice of the times and what does work is great, imo.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Memes" being just rage faces and advice animals to the wider internet was probably the most infuriating time period for me.

It was like the whole world collectively and simultaneously chose the most embarassing ways to anthropomophize their emotions.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 12 hours ago

The left hand goes on the left or the middle depending on the game.

 

The band has been described as doing metal/fuzz/stoner rock. This is from their album Black Hole Space Wizard Part 2. Part 1 and 2 make a complete story.

Humans escaping from a dying earth about to be devoured by the titular wizard, ship crashes with only one survivor. This track is the survivor trekking across a desert.

Will probably post a couple more from them.

 

Dankpods used 12 computers with different hardware to test the performance of 5 games in 1080p and 4K, comparing the average fps results of the games' built in benchmarks to determine which OS ran the game better across the same hardware: Windows or Bazzite.

Some notes on methodolgy under this spoiler

Each game uses the same in game graphics settings in Windows and in Linux. The Linux distro used was Bazzite, using the version specific for the graphics card hardware fpr each individual machine. To be clear, this means that he installed the Bazzite version for (legacy) nVidia as appropriate.

Each bazzite install was fresh, no copying installs or swapping around a drive with it pre-installed. After install, it was updated using system update and rebooted, repeated until no updates remained.

Screenshots of some of Dankpods's comments to this effect:

There are many comments under the youtube video pointing out that in many of the Linux runs, it was not actually using the correct driver, comments about the experience using other distros, and comments about various potential fixes and workarounds.

This misses the point. Dankpods intentionally tested this way, and used Bazzite, to try and show what this would be like for the average gamer schmuck without a ton of technical skill interested in switching to Linux. Out of box experience matters in this situation, even though it's not quite fair to compare that between free opens source distros and an OS created by a megacorp. To the average end user, it won't matter. They just want it to work.

Prepare to be upset. With this particular testing methodology, Linux doesn't really win overall.

I'm interested to hear the community's thoughts on this.

 

An absolute classic youtubepoop. Can't believe it's 17 years old.

Just about any line from this activates me like a sleeper agent. This is going to be stuck in my head for a month, at least.

145
Push button for snail (media.piefed.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/surrealmemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

Check the new pinned post in .ml's meme community. Here's the post itself:

There's so much goofiness to unpack here.


And a bonus, this small comment thread. We're totally not a marxist instance guys but we totally are a marxist instance guys and it's such a good thing:


I can't mentally square how someone could claim their instance is general use, run a general meme community, and also openly state the community purpose is to further specific ideology. Wow.

Nothing against surfacing lesser heard voices, but that's not the place for a generic meme comm (go make a leftymemes equivalent or something), and we all know that isn't what's really going on here.

 

Someone gifted this to my wife and I after our successful IVF. Still haven't put our photos in it, and everytime I see it I giggle.

Miracle Love Baby sounds like some magical girl anime shit.

 

Honestly? That's rookie numbers.

 

Bah humbug.

 

PrefaceI'm not trying to call out the mod action of removing my post from the comm so much as I'm calling out the complete lack of mod action leading to the comm becoming shit and having the current top post by scaled, hot, and active being a post that explicitly targets another lemmy user.

That out of the way... !mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world has clearly been slipping from the purpose of the comm for a while now. Most of the posts are actually infuriating and/or political. I understand that what qualifies as either of those can be different for different people, but I feel most of this shit clearly isn't mundane or simple enough to fall under the label of just mildly infuriating.

Here's some examples from the first page right now, sorted by scaled.

While I could have sworn the sidebar had a no politics rule, it doesn't at the time of me writing this up, so politics are arguably acceptable, although I personally feel these all clearly don't match the theme of the community, violating Rule 7.

Sidebar, and expanded rule 7

A few other posts have been made calling this out.

Mod harder and [META] What actually constitutes "mildly infuriating" content?

################################

Beyond all that mess, we have what was the final straw for me.

Rule 1 (and less so 5), and the current top post by scaled, hot, and active.

I cannot accept that a post to mildly infuriating that targets a specific user while not even removing their username is respectful, and I personally consider it harassment (while it may not violate rule 5 as there is no call to action). Removing the username is usually the bare minimum even in the fucking reddit brigading subs, for plausible deniability.

And regardless of whatever arguments can be had about interpretations of the community's specific rules, it's a dick move. Just block the guy. It reminds me of the god awful reddit dogpiling and brigading. I don't want any of that to come to lemmy.

So I reported it, then saw the recent posts asking mods for action that got no response. I then looked at the mods.

  • LillianVS@lemmy.world (Aer) has not been active in two years.
  • STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world (Striker) has not been active in one year.
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world had not appeared to be active for six days at the time I reported the post, but upon checking the community mod log was likely active two days before (assuming that the other two wouldn't be just lurking and modding for over a year).

So I did something dumb as hell. Roughly an hour after I reported it, I made my own post (now removed from the comm). I find people who make call out posts about others, and the absentee mods allowing it, mildly infuriating. Yeah, childish as shit. What's done is done.

Modlog:

Removed for "doesn't fit community", but what do you folks think? Does it really not fit when the top post is what it is? Personally I think both should be gone, lest that comm descend further into shit.

Either way, now that I have this yell into the void out of me, I'm blocking the comm. Maybe I should have made my post in actually infuriating? (kidding)

view more: next ›