wizardbeard

EDIT: Misunderstood your comment.

As far as cloud infra goes, rumor has it that a lot of Azure's underlying shit is on Linux already. Would explain the cross compatibility work with WSL, PowerShell, .Net, etc over the past decade or so.

Holy shit, you've got a line on artisinal cheese duck fleshlights? I've been in the market for ages!

I appreciate and agree with this sentiment entirely, but the people who need to hear it won't.

Lots of people crowing about the (I think it was) Chinese idea of solidarity, where the peaceful protestors shouldn't undercut or decry the violent protestors because they're all on the same side. They missed that the incredibly oversimplified concept is meant to flow both ways.

Yes, this isn't enough, but that doesn't mean this isn't also an important step in the right direction. The way this is worded definitely sounds like a party switch. If he's the horrible asshole everyone here thinks he is, it's not like it ever takes long for these folks to demonstrate it again.

I don't make it a habit to check, but it has been fun to check and call out in precisely two scenarios.

• One user and I deep into a sub thread on a multiple day old post arguing about ettiquette here. Was weird to get multiple downvotes on those sorts of comments. They were using their "abandoned" alts.

• Another thread where I had repeatedly asked someone to share the source for their claim despite them insisting that I just wasn't googling right. I offered them to edit literally every comment (multiple thousand) on this account to sing their praises. Downvoted with no response.

In moderation. Everyone needs a way to lazily recharge. But make no mistake that even though it's engaging, it's only better for you than mindless content consumption by very thin margins.

I'm summoning salt, and this is the history of autism screening speedruns

Just who is this 3JOH NUF? A code name? Some super wizard class hacker? A government operative? Both?

Good point. I would hope it's a mixture of both.

But these people seem to have this crazy idea that anyone not openly resisting them endorses them. It's an important tool to show them otherwise. There should be no situation in which they feel welcome. They should be worrying that every pair of eyes could be reporting them. And it should be broadcast loud and clear that the situation is of their own making.

ICE under Obama did operations against supposed extra criminal illegals (sex traffickers etc) and also against "illegals" (people just living their lives while "not supposed to be here" 🙄). While it's definitely arguable they should have, they never got the kind of public resistance they're now getting under Trump. At the very least that needs to be made un-ignorable.

This whole situation is all the more damning because a certain amount of this sort of shit was acceptable as status quo. Not many people are going to wring their hands over actions taken against cartel or sex traffickers, or unfortunately people who can be convincingly labelled as such.

So when it's getting a response like this, it should be crystal clear just how fucking far over the line this is.

I personally still have a hard time advocating for precautionary violence, but there's surely a lot of ground to be gained in terms of breaking ICE morale.

Could be good, but could also be jammed. Have they been jamming cell and/or bluetooth out there? Also could be in violation of FAA laws (not that it really matters here).

Sweet! That was such a great one! Definitely feels more like a real game than a hack!

I'm not familiar with everyone involved, but if codenamegamma is programming it should be top notch.

I'm not who you asked for context.

You even took the time to edit this comment and didn't check who you were replying to?

Lol, wow. You just keep going deeper.

I'm teasing you a little about the clear chip on your shoulder, but I'm completely serious about the fact that you are broadcasting that chip loudly and that it's a you problem.

You immediately jumping to the conclusion that anyone ever making a complaint about noisy neghbors is in the wrong is ridiculous. Then your further insistence that anyone complaining about it that wants something done has to be calling for eviction or arrest is even more ridiculous.

Most people just want to be able to be in their house without hearing a domestic dispute through the walls, or without being able to make out exactly what songs their neighbor is listening to for multiple hours every day. The goal is to get that to stop, or at least lessen. The solution to achieve that is "whatever it takes, starting with the reasonable options".

If, after multiple polite conversations, and maybe even some not so polite ones, the neighbor continues or escalates? The loud neighbor has then chosen the severity of the solution by denying the reasonable ones. If you've had a neighbor talk to you about your noise repeatedly, then you were the problem, not them.

You can get a sheet of pads to make cabinets and doors more quiet for like $5. You can wear headphones for your music.

Personally, like I said in my last comment, I wouldn't escalate past talking to them and the landlord. Historically I've lived in complexes large enough that a noisy person could be moved to another unit if the landlord had recieved a ton of complaints, which would be my hope from the landlord at the absolute most absurd extreme. If nothing changed, I'd live with it and curse about it a lot. Probably bang on the wall on egregious occasions. Maybe blast something worse back right up against the wall rarely.