this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
120 points (99.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14314 readers
782 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/us-navy-investigates-sabotage-uss-gerald-r-ford-fire-1786273

any sailors from the Gerald Ford reading this postthank you for your service 🫑

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valarie@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Both of these come to mind

I hope they embed right, I'm testing a new Lemmy client

[–] TheSovietOnion@hexbear.net 3 points 18 hours ago

Works fine for me!

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago

Battleshit Fordemkin

[–] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

First the put laundry where the poop goes...

Then they put fire where the laundry goes...

Where are they gonna put the poop?

[–] christian@hexbear.net 2 points 6 hours ago

Where the fire goes, duh.

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The poop deck obviously. Frig its like you people never read or something

[–] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

Stop telling me to read Mark died like 500 years ago it's not even applicable I just go by vibes oh wait this is something else never mind

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

Unfortunately, nobody has ever really worried about dumping human waste in the sea.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I know it's probably just them revolting against bad working conditions and not being part of a genocidal imperial hegemon. But then, so were most of the crew of the Potemkin.

[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 6 points 22 hours ago

It’s because they may die for a change

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago

Isn't this the same ship where the sailors were flushing clothing and stuff down the toilets, and clogged them all up?

Clogging toilets is one thing, but setting fire to your own ship sounds like a pretty extreme strategy. These guys really don't want to be in the game.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wasn't aware it was on a six month deployment that was extended TWICE and is now on the 11th month

lmao they're absolutely revolting against the brass, extended deployments is a mental health killer for troops, there's definitely sabotage

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like they went from WARfighter to WOKEfighter frothingfash

[–] BearerOfPickles@hexbear.net 11 points 22 hours ago

I still love that little picture so damn much

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Considering the fire started in the ship's laundry facility, I'm calling this one "SchrΓΆdinger's floating dormitory full of dudebro manchildren who have never once cleaned a lint trap in their fucking lives."

Respect your electric clothes dryer, or it will literally burn you alive.

Thank you for coming to my a-guy talk.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the same ship where they were flushing clothing down the toilets. It's pretty likely that the fire is the same people that did that in my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spudnik@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I gotta believe they're not having each individual sailor do their own laundry unsupervised like a laundromat though right? Surely there are people whose job it is to do the laundry for the whole ship? So maybe these people know their shit well enough to get away with making it look plausibly enough like an accident or something. I have no idea though, I'm just speculating wildly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big if true, doubt it tho. Still hope they feel anger by being suspected of.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I personally think this one is true. This is the ship that had the toilet sabotage, where sailors were flushing clothing down the toilets.

They fix that and then fires break out? These sailors want to go home and they're trying to force the ship into it.

[–] dustcommie@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You keep suggesting/stating the toilet stuff was sabotage when there is little reason to believe that.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 19 hours ago

Ever see the toilet suction on a ship? That will tear the clothes right off your body, and suck them right down the pipe. I'm sure that's what must have happened. There's absolutely no other explanation for how those clothes got into the toilet. Surely it wasn't done by young sailors who want to go home and get laid.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

An earlier report by NPR on January 17 already exposed the toilet problem. According to the report, the vacuum sewage system of the Ford means that a problem with one head can cause all of the toilets in that part of the ship to lose suction, making it difficult for the maintenance crews to isolate a problem. The crews find everything from T-shirts to a four-foot piece of rope clogging the system. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202602/1355709.shtml

If they're finding t-shirts flushed down the toilets that is 100% sabotage.

This ship is only supposed to be deployed for 6 months at a time. It has been deployed for 11 months. They have every reason to be engaging in this behaviour. They want to go home.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

clueless "Sir, there's no way the Sailors did this to sabotage our efforts! Support for the war is nearly 100%!"

'Did the survey specify which side the support is for?'

aware

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago

they probably scared because they are gonna face a foe that can actually punch back. If it was a typical weak foe, these sailors would not have any problem doing their Imperialist duties. What's a few dead poor brown kids, as long as you get free med and college eh?

[–] Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pete Kegbreath will blame it on a DEI recruit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago

Sir! you cant prove shit sir!

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Jam a blΓ₯haj in the lint trap, fill the dryer with oily cotton bathtowels, run on high

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That behemoth is way over due to return to port and isn't scheduled to return for months. It should return to port every 9 months (iirc) and its been deployed for over a year.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I heard recently it was supposed to be a six month deployment and has been extended twice (once for venezuala war crime, again for iran war crimes)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

Coming Soon - Cuba War Crimes!

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 23 hours ago
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Wondering out loud if aircraft carriers got arms on board someone might HYPOTHEICALLY do a muntinity with?

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They do. All US ships AFAIK have an armory for small arms in case of emergency, patrols/lookouts, or they have to go ashore for whatever reason in a war zone. They're incredibly strict and of course there's a hall monitor chud who counts every bullet and gun that gets checked out while keeping everything under lock and key.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

of course, we disavow such actions.

fedposting

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whiskers165@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago

Real American heroes if tru

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί