She thinks Israel killed him.

Of course she is. That world is entirely populated by grifters.

WE ARE 🦅

Was*

Someone who died for what they believed in

Said belief just happened to be that potentially getting shot in the neck is a small price to pay for everyone to have guns

A professional propagandist clown for christian nationalism

Attention seeker. Loudmouth. Bigot. Gum model.

Who the hell is John f. Kennedy?!?

She was Captain of the Enterprise after Christopher Pine

It's worse than an echo chamber that they have. It's isolated improv. They aren't just agreeing, they're "yes and"ing. Collective world building without critical thought, disagreement, or awareness that it isn't how reality works.

They also say things that don't make any sense if someone understands how a calendar works.

Stochastic suicide? 😗

He just made a very pointy argument against guns.

He certainly was Haram

This was pushed hard when it happened but I've never seen anything actually pointing to him being MAGA. He was raised in a right wing household but also dated someone trans and killed a right wing spokesman.

His social media got nuked right away so not much on that side. It was probably a mixed bag which is maybe more dangerous to have in the news in terms of inciting copycats. Easier if both sides blame it on the other, wouldn't want anyone to see himself in him.

That being said, I don't think his allegiance matters as much as the fact that Charlie deserved it. If you are punching Nazis, you are a good guy in my book.

I much prefer the real story about somebody killng charlie kirk because he was an annoying rich guy.

Because it’s absurd nonsense

Candice Owens has suggested that various powers that be played a role in Kirk's assassination, particularly for speaking out against Israel.

Candace thinks Israel killed Charlie Kirk.

Because Kirk had reportedly refused to keep taking money from a prominent Israeli donor, and didn't want to keep being so pro-Zionist.

Frankly, I don't actually think that's totally impossible, though its far from conclusively proven.

However, if you know anything about guns or ballistics... the scenario that has thus far been presented by the FBI as to the kind of weapon that shot Kirk and the angle and distance he was shot from...

Its completely impossible, and does not align with the evidence on the scene.

If Kirk had been shot from basically the front, by a 30.06, in the neck, it would have blown half of his neck off, there would have been a massive back blast of viscera behind him.

What the actual wounds from the autopsy point toward is that roughly a 5.56 round from Kirk's above and right, entered his neck on the right side, traversed around and through various parts of his neck, untill it ended up severing the corotid artery on his right side and lodging itself into his left collar bone.

That bullet trajectory actually matches the specific injuries from the autopsy, and the video evidence.

A 30.06 from roughly 150 yards away... would have zero chance of embedding itself into a collar bone.

It would detonate it, shatter it, blow it apart.

A 30.06 from 500 yards away will shatter the femur of a moose... there's an order of magnitude more kinetic energy in a 30.06 than a 5.56 round.

You can run all the math on the physics of this yourself if you doubt it. I've already done it, search through my comment history if you want to see it.