this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
205 points (98.6% liked)

News

36354 readers
2541 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Oh naur, but we need to know about futures markets or whatever this betting site is pretending to be.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Our entire reality is run by bad ideas now.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Don't worry, pretty soon AI will take over, I'm sure it will bne fine.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

It is astonishing how much insanity we have to tolerate. It is quite evident that gambling is harmful for all, yet we do nothing but remain ageist against the minorities and barely solve the real issue.

Things are escalating further and further. This isn't some regular gambling any more, it's a crime on humanity. Polymarket is the enabler, and as such should be banished. Incentivising peoples misfortunes is anti-humanity.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Bro working at Nuclear Missile Command: "I am gonna make so much money on this bet!"

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

99 Kriegsminister
Streichholz und Benzinkanister
Hielten sich für schlaue Leute
Witterten schon fette Beute
Riefen: „Krieg!“, und wollten Macht
Mann, wer hätte das gedacht?
Dass es einmal so weit kommt
Wegen 99 Luftballons

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Money that won’t be worth anything moments later.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

99 Jahre Krieg
Ließen keinen Platz für Sieger
Kriegsminister gibt's nicht mehr
Und auch keine Düsenflieger
Heute zieh' ich meine Runden
Seh' die Welt in Trümmern liegen
Hab' 'n Luftballon gefunden
Denk' an dich und lass' ihn fliegen

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago

Collect money, convert to bottle caps.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have little faith the international community would sufficiently sanction and punish this.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s… not exactly what I meant.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And yet you’re both correct.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's ok, MAD will take care of it.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who exactly is doing the "Mutually Assured" part for Iran?

If the US deploys a nuke in Iran:

  • as long as it's not an ICBM over adversaries, it won't trigger immediate response systems. Tactical nuke would probably be the choice.
  • Russia won't nuke the US back for this. China won't nuke the US back for this. Iran doesn't have nukes, though could do a dirty bomb or something -- but that's not consistent with MAD. Pakistan is cozying up to the US for their war in Afghanistan, and India isn't highly aligned. There's no way the EU would nuke the US in retaliation, they'd only deploy them defensively.
  • As much as I would want, I can't see Canada or Europe severing all ties with the US or going to war over it, which would be the only acceptable responses.

I do not want the US to do this, they absolutely shouldn't, but I fear they could do it and it would stir up only a tepid response from protesters and not governments.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Russia nukes Kyiv, China nukes Tokyo, North Korea (assuming delivery capabilities) nukes Seoul, India probably drops nukes on China and Pakistan, etc. It's the actual Domino Theory people were talking about during the Cold War, they just thought the domino was communism. Once the bandaid gets ripped off and nuclear weapons are an accepted and normalized tool of conventional war, they're now EVERYONE'S first resort.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago

Well for one thing, if the US breaks the nuclear armistice then surely russia will point to them as they follow suit.

Then Europe will be in the awkward position of deciding whether retaliation is called for. If they don't retaliate, putin keeps nuking ukraine. If Europe does retaliate, putin nukes NATO and the world enters a full-scale global war likely ending in nuclear armageddon.

Any use of nuclear weapons in any context will have catastrophic results.

Not that the current "leaders" of the US care about that at all. They'll hide out in their bunkers while we all fry for their piss poor decisions...

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Foresight is for libtards.

(/s)

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

boutta be a bunch of millionaires in Bellevue NB

[–] DeepSeaString@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

How are these betting sites even legal I thought betting was illegal in most states

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 24 points 1 day ago

You're not betting, see? You're buying/investing in a "futures contract" in an open market and there's no house edge!

TL;DR it's gambling but structured in a way that evades current regulations.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, sports betting was decriminalized a few years ago. And everything got so much worse.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Especially since they also legalized advertising for gambling services.

"Oh don't worry, just include a disclaimer about gambling addiction and seeking help and I'm sure everything will be fine..."

...while they promise free money and instant wealth to some of the most vulnerable and impoverished people in the US...

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago)

And... hate to say it, but there are a lot of people with 80-90 level IQ in the US. Many of them struggle with things like projecting forecasts, longterm planning. They are extremely vulnerable to these manipulative marketers.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 7 points 21 hours ago

Stock markets are legal in most states, so betting is legal in most states if you do it in a way rich people like.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I'm worried about how few people understand this.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago

I can't recall whether he discusses the legality of it, but YouTuber Drew Gooden has a video where he provides a lot of information about online gambling.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DlMLfxxvKD8

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 14 hours ago

WSB went corporate. The true degenerates who couldn't get to Wall street or the Vegas strip had to go somewhere.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hmmm. Not sure how perilous the denotation of a nuclear bomb may be but a detonation of one will be an absolute nightmare..

(I bet the spell check missed it completely since both are correctly spelled, but of course context.. and is a perfect example of why actually proof-reading your work before you post it is advisable. Oyyy.)

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right now a bunch of countries have operational nuclear weapons (and this ends in 1998). No one has used one in warfare since 1945 - right now there's basically a fragile truce on nuclear war. Putin threatened to use one but even he didn't actually pull that trigger.

If someone does... then I expect everyone does.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If anyone was dumb enough to use a nuke and also be proud... it will be trump...

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago

"It's armageddon, we did it for jesus! I am the angel of war!"

"A day's wages for a day's grain! Keep your hands off the wine and oil, peasant!"

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Or Netanyahu.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

the subtitle has "probablibly"

At least we can say it's unlikely to be ai slop.

[–] null@lemmy.org 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It'll just be on some other platform. Gambling is spreading. It's in fucking everything now.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

What's the over under for it moving to another platform?

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I wonder when Yahoo News will start allowing bets.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip -2 points 18 hours ago

I'd put money on "within 90 days". France just sent nuclear armed jets to its allies.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone else wondering if this was a distraction from the other polymarket news related to Iran?

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, that sounds about right. I wonder if Pete made him some beer money.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I don't know but maybe it was "number of children murdered in cold blood this week"

Are we at that level of depravity for capitalism yet?

Who am i kidding? Of course we are.