Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
self-driving cars
Ew, fuck off. I don't trust those things being on the road near me, not with how much worse they are than human drivers right now.
Edit: To be clear, my complaint isn't about me buying a self-driving car. My concern is someone else buying a self driving car and it hitting me as either another driver or a pedestrian.
As someone who works in the bay area California. The Waymos are unfortunately better than most human drivers. It is noticeable....
Which isn't a high bar to clear. Humans are horrible at driving.
At least theres a human to be responsible though, in most places with mandatory insurance.
Personally, I think waymo should be allowed to operate, but each car should be tied to someones ownership/ liscence (ie the CEO's) and that it should come with an automatic guilty / full at fault in any accident or incident.
Depends on whose. The Waymo ones do remarkably well. Other makers aren't nearly as good.
Isn't waymo just using remote workers to drive the cars?
Not exactly; they've got a remote worker facility where they've got about 1 person per 100 cars, who maps out what to do in situations where the software can't handle it, but doesn't do a full-on remote-drive. This enables them to gracefully handle the long tail of situations the software can't do yet, so long as not every car hits it at once (as with, say, a power outage causing all traffic lights to fail in San Francisco, or flash flooding causing issues all over Phoenix)
I’d prefer that to them just letting an AI do it
I'd rather pay a taxi driver.
For a lot of people, the main risk with a taxi is being attacked by the driver.
They said taxi, not uber.
Those have the same problem, but less concentrated ownership
Well, yeah…
I don't care. Any self driving car is resigning my autonomy to a corporation. That is not fucking happening. for the love of god just invest in busses already
Yeah, but the whole point of a car is autonomy and independence. The person's, not the car's. If you're looking for someone, or something, to transport you places, buses and trains are much cheaper and safer.
Self-driving cars can give an amazing level of autonomy and independence to people like never before. Think about elderly and disabled people who normally would have to rely on others to get around having the ability to do so on their own terms.
Also think about freedom of time you would get back. Stuck in a traffic jam? Watch a movie, read a book, get some road head. Everyone suddenly has their own personal drivers.
Accidents would decrease too (Waymo has published a **peer reviewed ** paper showing that it’s almost 12x safer than people). No having to worry about drunk or tired drivers.
Most people don’t care about driving, they just want a way to get from point A to B, and self-driving enables all of that.
I'd rather live somewhere with buses and trains. You can get places when old and/or drunk, you build a better world for everyone, and you don't funnel money into shitty privately owned tech companies.
Everyone suddenly has their own personal drivers.
I don't want a driver. Even if I had enough money to pay a personal chauffeur, I wouldn't want one. I prefer to drive my own car.
But maybe I'm in the minority on that one. Maybe most people would prefer self-driving cars. That's fine, I guess, but I just hope someone keeps making regular cars, because I ain't interested in being driven around by a robot.
Ideally I'd be able to live in a city or town designed around people, not cars. So I wouldn't have to own a car, autonomous driving or otherwise, to get around.
Eventually your auto insurance will go up to the point where it's unaffordable to drive yourself.
This isn't a near future prediction, but it'll happen once self-driving cars reach a critical mass.
Eventually your auto insurance will go up to the point where it's unaffordable to drive yourself.
Then I'll sell my car for scrap and walk or bike. And when I can't walk or bike anymore, well, there's always mobility scooters.
Why would the cost of insuring human-driven cars increase? It's not like the risk of a human drivers will suddenly go up with driverless cars on the road. In fact, driverless cars, if they worked, would lower the claims rate of human-driven cars.
And the insurance companies won't pressure owners to switch to driverless vehicles. True self-driving vehicles won't require insurance at all. If the manufacturer is completely responsible for any risk, then it's the manufacturer that has all the liability. Your self-driving car would just have a lifetime worth of insurance coverage built into the purchase price. A world of only self driving cars is a world where car insurance companies don't exist.
It's almost like the ousted CEO of Stellantis was onto something with his "Dare Forward" plan. But apparently having long-term vision is punished by the market, so now they're bringing back gas guzzling V8s and fucking small-car diesel engine options (despite them being banned in more and more inner cities in Europe).
I’m thinking of Mary Barra at GM who pushed for the Bolt, then canceled it, then brought it back, then decided only the larger model and that it’s a limited run.
Yeah, that was some baffling leadership.
That got to me. I'd pay extra for a union made electric subcompact.
I wouldn't buy their bullshit cars anyway. As an American who has been inside many, I can say that most American cars and trucks suck. Their reliability and build quality have driven me to only purchase vehicles from former WWII Axis powers nations.
Globally, the Chinese automakers are taking a huge chunk of market share.
They're effectively banned in the US, which is why you can't buy a decent car for $7000
Is it just the import that’s banned? Or is it more, like registration, sale, ownership, purchase, …?
Like, if I could teleport a Chinese EV into my garage then what’s stopping me from using it?
You can't register it for on-road use, with an exception for automakers who agree to destroy the car within a year.
Was just watching a video that said the lowest priced new vehicle in the US is just over $20,000
The maintenance costs of my GM vs my Nissan are like night and day. My GM was junked by the time my Nissan was paid off, and that's getting close to half of its lifetime ago now, and I still haven't replaced as much shit in my Nissan as I needed to in the GM.
Though tbf, I have been putting only synthetic oil in it and that might actually make the difference. At least for the components on the drive train. I also recall not having working AC, fuel guage, digital clock display... Only issue with my current car is sometimes one of the speakers gets a bit of a buzz at certain frequencies, but even that doesn't happen frequently.
They are doing it to themselves so let them. What rises from the ashes will be more suited to getting the job done.
What rose from the ashes in 2010ish is the shit we’re dealing with now.
Nah. The US car industry has always been bailed out. Now its all owned by multinationals who use bribes err, lobbies to keep the free market captive. At some point they will lose the ability to due to one or more companies moving a factory to the states and that is when china will kill them.
I fucking cannot wait to see that ford is dead. Their cars are such fucking dogshit.
Don't hold your breath. If you haven't noticed they skated right through last time. And the times before. They have been really good at surviving.
No no it’s a free market until <insert_donor_company> feels the burn then it becomes a problem!
That's fine, they can survive on the large domestic market thanks to protectionist tariffs, and Americans can enjoy their very own Trabant equivalents
Who needs cars if you have AI and mass surveillance.
The same US Automakers who ruled the world virtually unchallenged for 100 years and then had to steal from the taxpayers to stay alive because decades of shit management had squandered every ill-gotten gain and opportunity?
That US Automakers? Yeah a NYT article ain’t gonna get it.
Car industry starts just before WWI.
Roaring 1920s. 10 years good.
Bankrupt in the 1930s. 10 years bad.
Good run from 1949 to 1979. 30 years good.
Almost bankrupt again in the early 1980s. 10 shaky.
Dirty 90s, with bailouts. 10 years shaky.
Sputtering along since 2000-2025. 25 shaky.
Equals:
40 good years.
10 bad years.
45 shaky years.
To sell them to a nation of impoverished firmer middle class who can't afford them
How is China surpassing the US if they don't respect intellectual property?
Don't tell me the useful idiots were wrong again?
narrator: they didn’t.
Driveable surveillance devices? Pass.