this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
65 points (90.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38103 readers
1179 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago

We do not "need" a variety of food. We eat it because we can afford it and it makes us healthier and happier.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Animal food is usually balanced to contain all the nutriens the animal needs, or most.

Ofc if it's proper

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well. We always have Soylent green ..

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Daily reminder that pet food is a more recent industry and before it existed pets mostly ate table scraps.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Asked my GF who's an aspiring crazy cat lady:

It's because (proper) cat food is engineered to contain all the nutrients they need. While it looks like a bland mush of only one thing, it's more like the cat equivalent of having several full nutricious meals run through a blender. The required variety is built in.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I’m convinced you could create such a food for humans too, it’s just not many people want that.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Speak for yourself, bachelor chow would solve many problems for me

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Awww shieeet I JUST got done finding a pee'n'gee. What am I gonna do with this thing now?

i9XDFqL3QjyZMBw.png

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 16 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’m convinced you could create such a food for humans too,

You could, and it would be very simple to do so.

1: Take all the food you'd eat for, say, a week. Absolutely everything.

2: Blend it. Maybe add some extra vitamins to make up for the ones that will be lost due to processing.

3: Dehydrate it. (To make it more compact and less likely to spoil.)

4: Compress it into pellets.

Done. You have now created 'human food'.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s what I find so absurd about the “humans need variety in their diet” mantra. If we need some vast unknown combination of things, how is it that letting people loose on supermarkets and choosing their own recipes somehow achieves that, compared to at least some first pass attempt based on macro nutrients?

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Because many of our modern staples are fortified with essential vitamins and nutrients.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago

We also get cravings for specific foods when our bodies are lacking in a nutrient that food contains. I don't think we have them for every nutrient our bodies need, hence why people can get nutrient deficiencies by accident even when the nutrient they need is available, but there's some instinctual failsafes for certain ones that must have been scarce or intermittent enough for cravings to confer an evolutionary advantage.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

Ok, what we'll do is, we'll take some sort of kibble, A, fortify it, call it "Vegetable Delight". Then another sort of kibble, B, fortify that, call it "Ox Fondue". Then another, just like the previous ones, call it, say, "Mystery Surprise". All fortified. Then you just alternate them. Mondays, A. Tuesdays, B. Then Wednesdays you think C but nope! A again. Then B, then A, THEN B, and then, finally C, so you have something special to look forward to on Sundays.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Blending it is pre-digesting it which means it doesn’t travel our bodies quite the same way.

We have long digestive systems for a reason.

I’m not saying it isn’t possible but you’d probably shit funny for a long time

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

Pemmican! We should be eating pemmican.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There are powdered meals that are supposed to offer balanced nutrition. I've heard of people living off Soylent, Huel, etc. I don't think it's good long-term, and the lack of chewing could cause problems. But it is feasible in principle.

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I did a long period of time where Solyent was my main nutrition source and I ate different food if I went out to eat socially with people (which to be fair was several times a week). As far as I can tell, the only problem was getting used to the high amounts of fiber

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I ate only soylent for a long time, and the lack of chewing did cause me some issues: first was bad oral hygiene. I brush and floss twice a day (after breakfast and before bed), yet I still got a cavity. Chewing normal food also cleans off plaques on your teeth, so when you're not chewing anything those plaques just sit there fucking your shit up. Second (*and this is just my conjecture) chewing causes activity in a certain part of the brain to spike, so if you're not chewing anything that part atrophies and causes depression. I forget where I read the chewing part though. So, along with the cavity, I also felt generally sad about everything. I would still definitely have it for lunch everyday because the nutrients are there, but yeah, unfortunately you have to chew stuff. I thought about just chewing gum, but those are all chock-full of microplastics so...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Its called soylent. Been around for at least a couple decades.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that basically what Huel is?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's true, but we're not cats.

It's can be difficult to change a cat's food. You have to gradually introduce the new food mixed in with the old food, or the cat may just refuse to eat it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mycatsays@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago

My current cats have Opinions (capital O) about what is or isn't food. I tried giving them variety, at least in flavour. They don't want it. The want one specific brand of fish-flavored wet food (in jelly, not gravy). They'll eat some kinds of fish-flavored kibble if wet food isn't available. Anything else, they have to be pretty desperate.

At least they both like the same stuff! But the lack of variety is 100% on them, not me.

(My previous cats would eat most things. These two are just weird.)

[–] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

....why the fuck did i waste time reading all that

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

need a variety of food to survive?

It's not true.

Boredom feels terrible while it lasts, but it doesn't kill you. In the end, humans usually start to get creative after boredom.

Oh, and yes, some food industry has found out things and told you things... yes, they were creative :-)

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

What about the British? They were starving, and they didn't get creative. They just kept eating brown goo for centuries.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I had heard that British cuisine was much more robust before WW1.

Also, if brown goo is meat-flavored, I'd be down for it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

My guess: Cats might get everything they need nutritionally from one meat source. Humans need a more diverse diet.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 17 points 3 days ago

You as a human could also live with the same food every day if it covered every dietary need. Especially if you depended on someone else to acquire it and had no choice.

There is an evolutionary push for a rich variety of nutrients obtained from a variety of sources, but the mechanism driving that daily "need" for variety is force of habit and desire for novelty. On top of that, some people are happy to eat nothing but junk and have very narrow tastes. How come?

Also, I can assure you, a lot of cats will periodically stop eating a certain brand or flavor and go through cycles. Does it mean the food isn't really covering their needs or are they just bored of the same flavor every day? Hard to know, but I would argue your assumption about humans being too different from their pets when it comes to variety in their menu.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm a living proof that you can eat the same thing every day for decades and be just fine.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

If the food you're eating doesn't contain all the nutrients you need you're unhealthy as fuck and it will come back to haunt you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

There are lots of dogs and cats who crave variety in their diets, too. Like humans, it's a behavioral thing rather than a nutritional necessity. My shepherd will simply stop eating regularly unless I vary her diet. I usually have three or so options I rotate through to keep her interested in eating. Lots of people add toppers and mix-ins when they have dogs like mine, but I find that only increases food rejection, as smart pups learn to hold out until we sweeten the deal enough.

I worked for a pet food manufacturer, and it amazed me what customers would do to try to entice their picky pets to eat. One guy was giving his dog lasagna, and he was shocked that his dog didn't want to eat kibble anymore. Imagine that.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

To add on to other peoples answers regarding the complete nutritional makeup of pet food; many animals can make a variety of the amino acids they need to survive with just a few inputs (like deer and cows eating only (mostly) plants), but some, especially predatory animals, cannot. They get those nutrients from the prey they eat, which in turn got them from the plants.

It essentially comes down to which enzymes any given organism can create, which ones their DNA codes for *or which microorganisms are allowed to exist within their system. Humans can't make a bunch of these amino acids themselves. Many (maybe all of them, not that far into my class yet) of the reactions taking in place in any living organism are entirely reliant on enzymes to catalyze them; that is, without them these reactions would take millions of years to complete.

BTW there are appr. 37x10^17^ (3,700,000,000,000,000,000) reactions happening in your body every second. All of them (or at least a great majority of them) require enzymes to complete.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 7uWqKj@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cats and similar animals are adapted to specific environmental niches, but humans are generalists. One of the drawbacks of being generalists is that we’re not specialized enough to fully subsist on any single food source.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

We can definitely subsist on a single food source if it's been engineered to be nutritionally complete like pet food has.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

We don't need a variety of food to survive. But, generally, we have choice, so we choose to vary our diet because it's more interesting.

Pets do not have a choice. They eat what they're given. Or they choose not to and die (a lil cat I was sitting chose that route).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

They keep making solya t/bachelor chow...

Nobody buys it.

But you can 100% meal prep something and just eat it everyday as long as it's got everything balanced. That's what pet food is. It's not like there's an animal whose flesh is cat food, it's processed and fortifiex

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 3 days ago

I have a low burnout rate with food, and there are probably meals that I could just keep eating repeatedly. Note that these are multi-ingredient foods so could theoretically offer balanced nutrition and be flavored to a preferred taste.

I don't do so for several reasons: cost, availability, convenience, sharing meals with others who have different food preferences, and simply because I still prefer variety.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

My thoughts were: At the mercy of their owner for one. Then a simpler obligate carnivore's taste buds and brain reward system vs an easily bored omnivore with thumbs and unga fire.

Cats can be pretty different with food preference compared to each other. My two aren't super picky. One is allergic to something in kibble so they both only eat wet food. I noticed above all that they vastly prefer paté pucks to a mince in gravy, no matter what flavour any of it is. Seems to leave them feeling fuller too afterwards. Priority: scent, mouth feel, and then taste is considered last is my observation.

spoiler
That said, a lot of humans in NA who don't cook at home are eating the same crap repackaged in multiple ways from the same Sysco supply monopoly served at almost every restaurant :p

[–] Pirat@lemmy.org 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wildcats (tigers, lions, bobcats, etc) will take down a prey animal. We think they just eat the muscle. In reality, they often go for the stomach of the herbivore they just brought down to get the vegetable matter there. Then they eat other internal organs (liver, spleen, kidneys) so they aren't just eating muscle.

For our pets, well, we all know they don't eat the same thing every day. Firstly, the the thing they do eat every day, pet food, has various nutrients included so it's a balanced meal for them. Secondly, we give them treats which may or may not be beneficial.

As for we humans wanting variety, it's exactly that. We want but don't need as much variety as we get. We enjoy the different flavors even if the items containing those flavors aren't exactly good for us (twinkies, 8 year scotch, etc). Our pets and wild carnivores don't get the opportunity to try these other flavors (well, our pets get some opportunity but not to the extent we have granted ourselves).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not sure that's a universal thing with cats. Unless she's really hungry, the current feline resident of my household most definitely will turn her nose up at a dish if it's the same as she was fed in the last meal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›