Of course it should. I feel it's kinda obvious. Do you think it shouldn't?
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Would you (personally) trust me to build a bridge you cross everyday on your way to work, as someone who has never built anything before (other than software)?
You’re not giving a context.
Yes blue collar work is skilled in that not everyone can do it and some people do it better than others. You as someone not in that field can’t just take it up and be competent. Really there’s only general labor that’s not skilled anymore.
If the context is special work visas, supposedly these are skills that can’t be found domestically. So no, blue collar jobs and most white collar jobs are not skilled. …. And there’s a good argument that the distinction is companies not wanting to pay more
Work is work, no need for distinction. Capitalists don't work, that's all you need.
No war but class war.
"Skilled" and "unskilled" work? I reject this Americanism.
It is the basis of visas around the world, bad as that may be.
Eh, more or less skilled, sure, but "unskilled" is never accurate. I say this as someone who's very clumsy by nature and takes forever to do manual tasks that others won't struggle as much with. I know that there's a lower floor of skill (the floor I inhabit 😭), so they can't just be doing "unskilled" tasks.
Oh yeah. Fair enough. I was thinking more “skilled”.
There is no such thing as unskilled labor.
Unskilled labor has nothing to do with skills. It's a euphemism for easily replaceable workers.
people always say this, but I don't recall anybody proposing a better term
I agree with your statement, but I recognize that the term "unskilled" in this context means something different than you and I would like it to
This is a very optimistic but ultimately baseless “feel-good” take.
I don’t think we should discount the importance of unskilled labor, or even its difficulty, but unskilled labor most certainly does exist.
Eh. There are definitely jobs that you can grab random guys off the street for and they will be okay enough at them to get started right away or will be able to be trained to do them in an afternoon. Think of any time you've done a volunteering project - you don't get any specialized training to do this type of work, but you can go ahead and get started with maybe like a short explanation of how it works. Sure you won't be as good as a pro, but you could get up to speed quite quickly if it was all you were doing. These types of jobs are becoming less and less common as they get automated, but they do still exist. That is what is meant by "unskilled labor." It's not a dig at the people who do these types of jobs, but rather that you don't need specialized training to do them.
Just because the skills required for a job are very common doesn't mean the labor is unskilled. That is a myth made up by the 1% to divide the working class and pit us against each other.
You're trying to make a weird semantic distinction that doesn't really accomplish anything. Unskilled labor doesn't mean undignified or unworthy of respect, it is just a description of a certain kind of work with essentially no barrier to entry. Again it's very uncommon in modern advanced economies but in the past (and today in some very poor areas) you'd have people whose job it was to push millstones around in a circle all day, a job that is also done by literal donkeys. That is not skilled labor.
I am a tradesman
I also have a bachelor of science degree
What I do is most definitely skilled labour
The bullshit, classist crap about what is and is not skilled labour is pathetic
I can promise that when the chips are down, the most useless people are the ones who sneer at those of us with calloused hands
I respect the fuck out of anyone who does jobs I can't or don't want to. The guy who empties septic tanks has my genuine respect and appreciation because if not for him I would have a really shitty job on my hands. Hopefully the humor doesn't undercut the sincerity of my comment.
There is both skilled and unskilled people in blue and white collar jobs.
Just tell a master mason that his job is "unskilled". You may keep the black eye for free...
It already is considered skilled labor.
White collar and blue collar is orthogonal to skill. Their are jobs in both categories that a monkey could do, and other jobs that take years and years of skill development to do well.
By "blue collar work" do you mean that done by mechanics, carpenters, masons, plumbers, electricians, machinists, tool operators and repairmen? because yes I do.
It usually is. True unskilled labor is becoming less and less common as machines take over those tasks. Unskilled labor means that you could get any random person off the street and, if they had the physical ability to do the work (such as lifting heavy objects) they could do it with minimal training. Think of the type of thing you do at volunteering events where you get at most like a 30 minute explanation of what the job is and are set off with your task, or just moving a heavy object you can't move yourself. It's not that you can't be skilled at these jobs, but rather that there is little to know barrier to entry for starting and actually doing the job. This type of job was way more common most places in the past, where you had people whose job it was to mill grain by pushing a giant wheel, or people whose job it was to break rocks apart by hitting them with a hammer. Sure you can be better or worse at this, but it's not like you couldn't figure it out very quickly.
These days, true unskilled labor is pretty rare in advanced economies. You have to have a lot of knowledge of how to use some kind of machinery or equipment, or how to do some kind of craft. The closest is something like low level retail work but even then that requires more skill than traditional "unskilled labor" required- skills such as reading, writing, and counting money, and even fast food jobs usually require training periods.
That's probably exclusively American term. I couldn't ever imagine calling a tradesman an "unskilled" labourer. You'll get a quick nosejob that way.
You wouldn't say this of a tradesman. Such people pass tests about meeting code, etc.
Unskilled labor is essentially labor that anyone with 4 limbs can do.
I'd call that unskilled, as someone who's done that kind of work. I've been the labor for a plumber, digging up septic pipes. Doesn't take any skill for that, just a willingness to sweat and get nasty. The plumber however definitely had skills, and I learned a LOT from him.
That implies there is unskilled labour. What jobs require no skills to perform? Except manglement.
Bro there were people back in the day who would just push a heavy millstone around in a circle, a job that was often also done by literal donkeys. It's hard to imagine in a modern economy, where truly unskilled labor is rare, but it exists. We often forget how much is done by machines that was done by laborers in the past or still is in poorer countries.
It's more a definition of how much training is required.
Blue collar (blue coveralls class) is just a derogatory term to describe someone that doesn't wear a white collar (business suit class) to work. But it sorta turned into a badge of honor by the blue collar class over the years, but it's meant to be an insult by the white color class.
It has nothing to do with skilled or non-skilled labor or education, it's supposed to be an insult based on the clothes required to wear to work.
Blue collar and skilled aren't mutually exclusive terms.
It's skilled or unskilled (takes advanced training or not)
And blue collar or white collar (manual labor or office/desk work)
E.g., a welder is both skilled and blue collar
I go by...
- Skilled labour: Jobs that require education or extensive training to be able to perform
- Semi-skilled labour: Jobs that require minimal or no education, but require some extent of on-the-job training to be able to perform the basic duties.
- Unskilled labour: Jobs that require no education, and can be effectively performed on day one by a new hire.
I'm sure there's also a "highly skilled labour" category that encompasses jobs that require extensive education, training, and practice, but I'm not really sure where to draw the line.
can be effectively performed on day one by a new hire.
If such a job exists, I've never seen it. A first day worker on ANY job won't be as efficient as someone with experience. Even a ditch digger has skills.
no shit they won't be as efficient. but they can do it without requiring weeks or months or years of training
edit: to clarify, I also don't think that there's a job where somebody can effectively perform it on day one (unless they have already learned the skills in a previous job in a similar role). but I do think that there are jobs where somebody can become a net contributor within a few days. like vacuuming. I used to have a job vacuuming apartment buildings and doing general cleaning maintenance. two days of training and I was good to go for all the buildings in the roster
In the first part of your edit, you explain why there's no such thing as unskilled labor.
I think the confusion here is that you are saying "unskilled" when you mean " skills that have been picked up without education", or "skills I assume can be picked up quickly"
Find me someone from an ancient civilization and see how well they vacuum without any training.
nah, I just think it's dumb to say "but everything is a skill" like it's some gotcha
sweeping is a skill you can learn very quickly. it's not complicated. you don't need special training to do it. the reason you can't be effective on day one is that you need to learn the processes of the job, not because you need to learn the skill. you can be effective at sweeping, but not effective in your role because somebody is expending time and effort to teach you the processes. not because you have to learn how to sweep.
The purpose is not "some gotcha". The purpose is that, by calling it unskilled labor you devalue both the role and the person doing it. Then it's easy to justify not paying them a living wage, not respecting them, and treating them as lesser.
Plus, you literally said "sweeping is a skill". So it's not unskilled. It's a quickly learned skill. Let's not be both demeaning and inaccurate.
right, so it's really just arguing over the definition, and thus each side is having a different argument
however you want to call it, sweeping is not a high skill task.