That was fun. Gives a bit more meaning to OOT’s Cuccos.
theherk
joined 3 years ago
Probably meant Zambia.
We don't, but even if we did it would be for the other interviewers I suppose.
Unfortunately no. Did a few months back but not at the moment. Times are tough out there. It was a very good candidate pool which is candidly not a good sign.
Been hiring for many years. I’ve never made a decision based upon of even cared a tiny bit about the results of a programming assignment. I prefer to simply talk through how they think about problems. I’d rather hire a person that knows nothing of algorithms or time complexity that can reason and learn than somebody that can write a pangram verification or heap sort in minutes but generally sucks at communication or reasoning.
It can’t. But I was replying to
A solution or proof that nobody understands has no value.
That implies a different meaning, at least in that person’s context, between proof and human understanding, with which I agree.
An unverified proof is not a proof; it is just conjecture. But there can be a rigorous, fully verified proof that we don’t fully have that intuition to understand. Those can be created by humans even, leaving AI completely out of the picture.
All I’m saying is a rigorous proof, even if not fully understood can be useful to finding and understanding other maths.
Oh, if your metric is that understanding and rigorous verification are the same then I agree, but then there is no proof at all without human understanding, so what are we talking about?
There have long been organizations which restrict extra operating systems or even vim, dumb as that is. Hasn’t changed. Some companies are strict about ai tools now too. Some have tight security about LLM gateways; others don’t. Some send date to big corpos; some don’t.
And I agree completely. But I think many assign the blame primarily to a weak opposition, which while true gives a tacit pass to the real evil driving the ship aground.
336
Jane Goodall, Eminent Primatologist Who Chronicled the Lives of Chimps, Dies at 91
(www.nytimes.com)
I find the hard puzzles take a long time too.
Said of Mozilla’s recent change to terms and privacy.
view more: next ›
I’m not sure that would have been better. Putting the whole tour at risk like this will prompt massive backlash from people that paid to see a show. Often tickets protect promoters from cancellations but in this case it may be unclear since it is the fault of the pressure from the top.
In either case, both this and that sure beat just playing the shows and letting Macklemore stand alone.