this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
45 points (83.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37994 readers
987 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you don't agree with the concept of good or bad people, you dont have to answer just down vote. If you think a person is good or bad based on where they were born and live you don't have to answer just down vote.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

This might be a hot take. I have a hard time with people who constantly drives above the speed limit. To me it says a lot about who they are.

E.g.

  • they believe that rules don't apply to them

  • that they are egoistic

  • that they are reckless and can't foresee the potential consequences.

  • that they lack empathy

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think this one depends on which country you're in. Speed limits here in the US are artificially low. There is an unspoken agreement that everyone goes 5-10 over. I go to Ireland once every couple years and the speed limits on the rural back roads are more like the actual physical limit. Like 80 kph on a winding one lane road that's barely paved. I've tried to reach the speed limit before and it didn't feel safe at all.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

Funny enough I have a hard time with people who drive at the speed limit, for the exact same reasons.

[–] xep@discuss.online 8 points 5 hours ago
[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

One of my tests as I've grown older is whether or not that person is capable of treating someone else's children as their own.

Both my father and step father did, so I didn't realize how rare of an attribute this is, nor did I realize how evil not having this attribute can make some seemingly good people behave.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 hours ago

By watching show they behave when they can get away with doing the bad things.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Everyone will name some virtue they consider themselves to possess, and then use that to judge someone else.

I do the same thing almost everyone else in here actually does. I ask, 'how much are they like me?' Because, we all think of ourselves as being a good person. If I'm shocked and repulsed by something they do, because I wouldn't do that, then they are a "bad" person.

A few will say the opposite, "If they don't do what I do, then they're better than me, so they're probably a 'good' person." Because to those few, self-depreciation makes them a "good" person.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's all about empathy. If they lack empathy or kindness then fuck them. I don't want them in my life and I prefer not to interact with them.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

For me it is more about what does the person contribute for the betterment of society.

[–] pir8t0x@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I determine it by analyzing their attitude, behaviour, body language, their personal beliefs.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Heh. I assume everyone is a bad person unless they immensely prove that they aren't. they can't do lots of drugs, lead chaotic lives, be anti-intellectual, be a gossip, be greedy, a control freak, have an immoral job, use religion as a cudgel, have no integrity, be overly optimistic, have lots of kids, etc. etc.

Optimists can be cringe but do you really think it makes them bad people?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Thats a pretty cynical view but I get it.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How do they treat those that are "beneath" them? Customer service workers, pets, kids, etc. Anyone that they should have some sort of authority over.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

That's definitely a big one for me.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

In addition, how quick they are to declare others to be beneath them.

[–] Blueliner@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

THIS is the answer. You can tell a lot about a person on how they treat people that they cannot use to make themselves richer or look better.

When you die, you will bring no money with you. You will bring no material items. Your words will be forgotten. Your name will eventually crawl its way back into the abyss of non-existence from where it came along with all the others. The ONLY thing that will have mattered in the slightest in your measly and momentary existence is how you made others feel. To live a life with any sort of self-importance is to rob yourself of the only thing that matters in the entirety of the known universe.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

By how they talk about people who aren't part of the conversation. Someone focuses a lot on heaping contempt on former coworkers and romantic partners, it's a bad sign.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Their ability to return their shopping cart to the corral

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Cart NARCS will forever live in my mind rent free

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 5 points 19 hours ago

Small addition: while nobody is watching. Or at least they think nobody is watching.

[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 2 points 17 hours ago

The true litmus test.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they harm other people, intentionally or not, physically, emotionally, etc. And they could stop but choose not to, then often they are a bad person.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Easy. By what they say and do.

I assume everyone is good by default, and I'll usually let a tasteless joke slide once, because we all occasionally put our foot in mouth.

If their actions and words don't mesh with my own moral compass, they aren't a person I associate with any more than necessary.

[–] Scuzzm0nkey@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

How people behave towards animals is a really big one for me. If someone doesn't like cats or dogs or any sort of critters for any reason other than a traumatic childhood attack memory I assume something is deeply wrong with them. I realize plenty of bad people don't hate animals, but I assume if you do then you can't be good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Although philosophers who embrace moral realism will have different views, my takeaway is that it is much harder to be a virtuous moral agent than the layperson assumes.

That said, if I find that a person often puts their own interests above those of everyone else, this is a good indication of questionable character.

[–] Blueliner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Staff@piefed.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Always hit em with an ocular pat down

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they lie all the time, they are probably willing to do other awful things as well.

If they are willing to steal outside of a desperate situation, if they treat someone who's been good to them awful, if they treat those beneath them awfuly, if they judge based on location, race, etnicity, etc. If they put whatever fantasy world they live in, over reality (antivaxxers and such, and yes religious people).

If they co-operated with Jeffrey Epstein, they only belong in the woodchipper.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'd mostly agree but would need to hear more about your view on religious people I guess.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Antivaxx mom let's baby die of mumps, because God wanted us to live (and die) natural lives, India citizen drinks infected, dirty lake water, because "holy water can't be dirty".

Ok, so you found some way to cope with life, and you believe in some deity or whatever, that's a you thing. But then, you start getting people killed over what is a belief, when you can clearly see with your own eyes that it is not working.

Was it really worth it?

load more comments
view more: next ›