Don’t be so positive.
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
477 points (98.2% liked)
Science Memes
20009 readers
875 users here now
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
- !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !arachnology@mander.xyz
- !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !biology@mander.xyz
- !biophysics@mander.xyz
- !botany@mander.xyz
- !ecology@mander.xyz
- !entomology@mander.xyz
- !fermentation@mander.xyz
- !herpetology@mander.xyz
- !houseplants@mander.xyz
- !medicine@mander.xyz
- !microscopy@mander.xyz
- !mycology@mander.xyz
- !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
- !nutrition@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
- !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
- !plantid@mander.xyz
- !plants@mander.xyz
- !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz
Physical Sciences
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !chemistry@mander.xyz
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !geography@mander.xyz
- !geospatial@mander.xyz
- !nuclear@mander.xyz
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
- !spectroscopy@mander.xyz
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
- !gardening@mander.xyz
- !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
- !soilscience@slrpnk.net
- !terrariums@mander.xyz
- !timelapse@mander.xyz
Memes
Miscellaneous
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
"Sorry, I wasn't taught the negative multiplication table"
I never knew Yoda was such an accomplished mathematician...
Tbf it can sometimes be difficult to understand him
Clever
You just spoke the "|" in "|X| = 3" silent.
That additionally would imply an uncountably infinite set of complex solutions.
Why assume the solution is in the complex numbers, and not in
- the real numbers (2 solutions)
- the algebraic numbers (countably many)
- the natural numbers (1 solution)
- the complex surreal numbers (proper-class many)
Gotta use some context to interpret these things :)
Well it's not physics. Show 'em what happens when you don't specify those kinds of things.
I don't think teachers need to specify that answers should be in the largest class of numbers students have been introduced to so far at school :)
If students are smart and motivated enough to learn about other stuff outside of school, they're smart enough to interpret the question.
My group theory teacher:
"Always two, there are [except in the degenerate case where a = 0]."
"Minus zero" redirects here; not to be confused with Godzilla Minus Zero.
Well thanks Wikipedia!
What are you, IEEE floating point? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754
Edit: actually read the negative zero article and saw IEEE floating point mentioned.... kinda kills the joke
You dare speak of the degeneracy!? 🤪
It's so unnatural...
Another, there is*
Unless you want to quote the movie
X^4-6^ were better.
The dark side of multiplication leads to many powers the Jedi consider unnatural