this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
174 points (98.9% liked)

science

25029 readers
506 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 12 hours ago

"Who are you again?I haven't had my coffee yet."

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Guess I'll die

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Only 2-3 cups?? Holy shit, I think I have dementia risk credit.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

We can start a scam like carbon-credits, and sell off our extra coffee usage to others who don't drink as much!

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 19 hours ago

I'm on my way to having anti-dementia, then.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How about 15?

Also, I wonder if they controlled for people who do specific kinds of work where coffee explicitly helps in the labor.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about 15?

Fight dementia today, by dying of a heart attack at 45 instead

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

15 is a fine number. I once had 15 in two hours. I'm fine.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I discovered a hack deal by just pouring extra shots of espresso into the coffee. One cup, 10 shots, one gram of caffeine. Expect the barista to glare with concern, it’s part of the deal.

I did once have two quad espressi while waiting for a flight at stupid o'clock in the morning at Stansted airport. The guys in Costa coffee mostly just found it amusing.

I was also once approached by an alcoholic who chastised me for drinking coffee in a bar in the middle of the day instead of "a real drink". I offered to take a shot of vodka for each espresso he drank and "we would see who dies first". He didn't take me up on my offer.

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How does any form of “labor” not fit that criterion?

[–] agingelderly@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yeah that doesn't make sense. More like if the people drinking 3-4 cups a day are doing mental work vs physical work

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Im not convinced that picking Amazon packages, operating heavy machinery, doing data entry, or copy editing would have vastly differing performance changes from coffee consumption.

However…

I would imagine that an office worker might have more ready access to coffee, such as a communal coffee maker, than someone with less sedentary workspace.

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Read in a book about coffee that without coffee the Industrial Revolution wouldn’t have happened. Coffee fuels capitalism by making people work.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe surgeons, dentists, and people who do similar small-scale hands-on work, like precision soldering, avoid coffee, because it makes for shaky (but alert!) hands. There are likely enough others that I'm not thinking of.

[–] homes@piefed.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I see plenty of this every day. Medical heroism doesn’t count. That’s just part of your Starfleet duty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In this case, it appears to be the caffeine. Also, with these sorts of large studies, the amount is self-reported, so "a cup" is whatever the person reporting considers to be a cup, it's not some controlled amount.

Key Points

Question: Is long-term intake of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee associated with risk of dementia and cognitive outcomes?

Findings: In this prospective cohort study of 131 821 individuals from 2 cohorts with up to 43 years of follow-up, 11 033 dementia cases were documented. Higher caffeinated coffee intake was significantly associated with lower risk of dementia. Decaffeinated coffee intake was not significantly associated with dementia risk.

Meaning: Higher caffeinated coffee intake was associated with more favorable cognitive outcomes.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Did they account for the coffee achievers? Maybe they threw off the curve.

Link for the kids

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

how are they defining "cup"? 16 oz? 8? some coffee roasters advise using 6oz "cups" as a measurement, some say 8

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t know regarding the study, but as a rule coffee “cups” are commonly either 4oz or 6oz.

6oz is the most common measurement for a “cup” of coffee as far as I know.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

which is hilarious because a "cup" for me is more than 3 times that

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, my average “cup” is like 16-18oz.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Causation vs correlation. I’m thinking caffeine keeps your brain stimulated which lowers risk of dementia. You can probably equally keep your brain stimulated other ways especially if you already have an active lifestyle.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Could be due to fiber. Reduce cholesterol, improve gut health

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago

My guess is that people who regularly drink coffee are supporting some sort of regular mental activity, like a job or school.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

especially if you already have an active lifestyle

There's no need to attack me so hard

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Haha doesn’t have to be physically active

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 22 hours ago
[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Iirc the causality is thought to be about opening vesicles and increasing blood flow in the brain.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ah interesting. Can that be done equally without caffeine?

[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Complex question. Many things increase blood flow like physical exercise or even alcohol. While being active for sure is healthy, alcohol combines the positive and the negative so the effect will not be measurable.

Apart from that: caffeine is the only controversial thing in coffee (other studies report different results). Decaf is healthy without doubt. For old people caffeine has no effect on sleeping so we could recommend it for brain health. If you can still feel an effect on your sleep, do what feels best for you.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

God made caffeine. Caffeine good for man. End. Of. Story.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's fine to highlight it's correlation, but your guess is a theory of causation. It's likely either some genetic combo that drives the desire for coffee or some lifestyle arrangement that drives the need.

Even the idea that an inactive mind leads to deterioration isn't definitively causation. Correlation goes both ways. Are they mentally healthy because they're mentally active? Or are they mentally active because they're mentally healthy? The degree of mental deterioration goes up as you age, which is also when you can retire, when you don't have to support your family, when you're physically incapacitated, and when you slow down overall. So yeah, I plan to stay active because I'll take my chances that it helps, but at some point, something will simply break. Maybe I'll inherit the dimentia. Maybe I'll inherit the neuropathy. Maybe both. Maybe neither.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Brosplosion@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Read the article? They found that decaf did not confer the same benefits

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 20 hours ago

Given that they specified "caffeinated tea" as also conferring benefit, I would guess it's the caffeine that's the active substance here.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If this is true I’m gonna be the smartest person in the nursing home.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More is better, right? . . . MORE IS BETTER?!?!!

*shlurp*

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The most pronounced associated differences were observed with intake of approximately 2 to 3 cups per day of caffeinated coffee or 1 to 2 cups per day of tea.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Correlation does not equal causation

Edit: although half the rate is very interesting

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

But it does nod in a direction and wiggle its eyebrows suggestively.

load more comments
view more: next ›