this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
272 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

18993 readers
1133 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

#xkcd No. 3204

Date: 2026-2-6

Title: Dinosaurs And Non-Dinosaurs

Alt text: Staplers are actually in Pseudosuchia, making them more closely related to crocodiles than to dinosaurs.

https://xkcd.com/3204/

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is amazing!

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What are those in the 'seem like dinosaur - are not' group?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Two pterosauri ("fyling dinosaurs"), plesiosaurus, dimetrodon, and I don't know the name of that other swimming dino, maybe mosasaurus.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Flying dinosaurs, swimming dinosaurs, but not dinosaurs?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

That's why I put the quotation marks ;)

[–] SqueakySpider@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but if those aren't Dinosaurs, what are they?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Pterosauria is a branch of archosauria, together with dinos and crocodiles. Idk about those in the sea.

[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Are birds dinosaurs?

I thought that they descended from dinosaurs. And - that doesn’t make them dinosaurs, right?

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 2 points 22 hours ago

You can not evolve out of a clade. Any way to group dinosaurs must include all of their descendants.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 12 points 2 days ago
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Taxonomically speaking, birds are dinosaurs.

There isn't a place to put a line between them - all the things that make birds "birds" also apply to dinosaurs.

A super fun fact is that of the two main types of dinosaur, Saurischia ("lizard-hipped") and Ornithischia ("bird-hipped"), birds actually evolved from the lizard-hipped group.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

That’s pretty hip.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Isn't that the same logic that technically describes all vertibrates as fish?

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

I'm sure I can think of vertebrates that have things that make them "them" that don't also apply to fish. For example do any fish have hips of any type? If not i can use "hip or not" to group vertebrates distinctly.

It's similar to the process that lets me differentiate vertebrates from invertebrates in the first place. squishy worm, worm with teeth, worm with jaws, worm with backbone etc.

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bony fish specifically but I'd argue that the common name for the clade bony fish is misleading and that bony fish aren't a subtype of fish but rather a clade of animals descending from a subset of the non-clade category of things we call fish. Not all fish belong to a single clade we can call fish, bony fish descend from one of these unrelated things we collectively refer to as fish.

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 8 points 2 days ago

Basically, I would say the term fish is more like our term for tree (representing a niche rather than clade) unless you would argue all vertebrates are fish. We are a member of the clade bony fish so we are bony fish but we do not fill the same niche as fish so aren't a fish. So "Bony Fish" is a noun distinct from bony (adjective) fish (noun).

[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*bony fish

We are closer to your average fish (I don't know any specific ones) with bones than they are with sharks (non-bony, cartilage!)

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Herrings, salmon/trout, cod/haddock are all bony fish.

The vast majority of extant fish are members of Osteichthyes (bony fish).

In particular, ray-finned fish are bony fish:

Actinopterygii, members of which are known as ray-finned fish or actinopterygians, is a class of bony fish that constitutes nearly 99% of the over 30,000 living species of fish. The vast majority of extant actinopterygian species are teleosts, and by species count they dominate the subphylum Vertebrata, comprising over 50% of all living vertebrates.

Yes. Also humans are chimps, dogs are wolves and wheat and most citrus fruits don't even exist.

Or we could accept that the whole idea of a purely genetic phylogeny with each clade bifurcating into two and later bifurcations always having to be grouped together with no regard for ecological pressures or mutation rates or hybridisation as the unhinged ravings of a geneticist (derogative) who has never touched grass, and move on.