this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
551 points (98.6% liked)

News

36118 readers
3059 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 106 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

There is no way MAGA will accept a Democrat victory in the Midterms, especially if it flips either chamber.

There is no way Trump leaves in 2028.

We ALL already know this in our hearts and our brains. We have to talk about it, and internalize it, and start making contingency plans for those nearly CERTAIN situations.

[–] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

There's no way that pants shitting mother fucker makes it to the end of his term.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 70 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here's hoping that people care this time.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not that people don't care, ever. Tens of millions of people care.

Unfortunately, their combined "donations" can't keep up with corpo/billionairie "donations", because most of us don't have generations of wealth acquisition to "donate"

Sadly, corporations are people and money is free speech, so what can you do? Supreme Court was "court of last resort", it's over.

Clarence got a new motor home though, so that's nice. Every cloud has a silver lining

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is the line. Let's be honest. That's the red line. If he actually crosses that line you should do things that the World mods will ban me for saying. But that's it. That's the point where any semblance of democracy is totally gone. Where even the most neoliberal Democrat has to know that voting no longer means anything. That's the point where you have to make a choice. That would be the final Point wherein there is a line of the sand you either put on the red hat and fall in line or you play back. Some would argue we've already reached that point mind you, but I think that would be the last reasonable line.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is the line?

No, this is the goalpost moving.

Anyone who didn't see this coming was either living under a rock or mockingly dismissing everyone telling them it's coming as Russian bots trying to take votes away from Democrats.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

never boo someone for being late to a party, just hand them a beer

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Let’s be honest. That’s the red line

There's been many red lines this past year. And this one isn't even a surprise move, it's been claimed loudly semi-continuously for five years now. Yet here we are.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why wouldn’t he commit more crimes? He’s been committing crimes with impunity his entire life. Who’s going to stop him?

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

It'sa me, Luigi!

[–] Pee_comes_from_the_balls@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wait, are we still all thinking he'll peacefully leave the white house after the shit he pulled last time?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

It's not even about him, it's the party. He didn't start the campaign to fix elections, the party did after they successfully bullied the democrats out of the 2000 election and filibustered a recount with court challenges and Ginsberg crossed over and endorsed the steal.

You can draw a straight line from the stolen 2000 election through 2020 to now. And it was stolen in multiple ways, from voter suppression, purging valid voters from rolls, putting faulty machines in democratic districts and otherwise sabotaging their use, throwing ballots in the trash from democratic districts, and so on.

This doesn't end with the president.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 38 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

REPUBLICANS should get Sole Control over who Wins Elections? They MUST Need some FUNDING for that! Let's GIVE it to Them!

-Chuck Schumer (D) and Hakeem Jeffries (D)!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago

Don't forget to ask for more funding for Democrats so they can continue their fight, this time for reals, honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

More treason.

In a healthy nation the Republican party would be disbanded and outlawed.

But this isn't a healthy nation, so assuming we get to continue having elections and they are fair and the Republicans lose, I expect American's hamster brains to completely forget about this in one or two election cycles and start flirting with letting these traitors have power again.

This dipshit proved who he was the first time around and we only managed to get through one term without him before letting a child back into the Oval Office. We're a very stupid nation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I mean the food, seats, and extra stuff is a lot better than AMC. The only reason I went to the AMC near me was for iron lung and so many seats had stains and the bathroom was ehhh.

Edit: Not sure how it went to this post, my b

[–] Morphite88@thelemmy.club 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago

Wait — let ‘em cook.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'll upvote this because it was funny to read in an otherwise depressing and aggravating political post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dellish@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump’s comments come as Republicans in Congress push a bill that would enable massive voter purges, impose photo ID requirements, and ban ranked-choice voting, universal mail-in ballots, and the acceptance of mailed ballots that arrive after Election Day.

And you just KNOW the Democraps are going to let them have it all too.

[–] dancroissant@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I can see Schumer now, giving a forceful floor speech, his fist in the air, half-glasses on the podium, "rest assured, this matter is not concluded!" Then promptly voting yes with a promise from republicans that we'll vote on something else later maybe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Surely the guys with big trucks flying Don't Tread on Me flags are against this

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

They think they'll be doing the treading. They are mistaken, but they won't realize until it's too late to save themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

The thing is, there's no mechanism for nationalizing voting, and I don't really see a clear path for Republicans to do that in the next nine months. They'd have to pass legislation to do that, which would be extremely difficult given their margins in congress. Even then, states control elections as a function of the Constitution, and while the Supreme Court is happy to approve whatever unconstitutional bullshit Trump dreams up, it will take times to get through the courts. He could try to seize control of the voting process from states, but I don't know that he has the infrastructure to manage the whole voting process through the executive branch, and the fact that he's asking the Republicans to do this for him makes me think he knows this. Either way, any kind of coup on the election process would face the same legal challenges as legislation.

That doesn't mean we shouldn't be extremely worried. I think it's unlikely that the Republicans will, "nationalize the voting," but I think it's very likely he'll send federal goons in to, "prevent voter fraud," (AKA suppress the vote).

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Executive Order has been their "clear path" to all sorts of shit they have no right doing.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, but most of those have either not been achieved yet or have only been achieved because they were relatively easy. He tried to abolish the 14th Amendment through EO on day one, and it's just getting to the Supreme Court now. He's been able to illegally dissolve federal agencies because the Republicans in Congress have abdicated their power, and destroying something is much easier than building it.

Even if he signs an EO to take over the elections tomorrow, he'll still face legal challenges that will likely wind up in the Supreme Court, and he'll still need to build out the infrastructure to run these elections federally, something the federal government has never done. I'm not saying that he can't steal the elections, or that we shouldn't be worried, but the idea that he's just going to, "federalize," elections in fifteen states before the midterms seems pretty unlikely.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He's been saying this kind of thing all along, either canceling or rigging the elections. Why is it only a fire now?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It was a fire the first time and every time since. It'll be a fire next time too. Likely we'll continue the trend of doing nothing about it while we slide deeper into Nazism, cuz that's how murica do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The election was quite close in Minnesota, and Harris won it. Of all the states won by the Democrats, Minnesota had the closest margin.

Is his plan as blatant as taking the demographic that voted against him, loading them into a van, and disappearing them?

https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/us/results

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Republicans” should.

Not the States, not bipartisan whatever…just them. That tells you everything.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Quickly: let’s do nothing!!!

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

So less state rights? And more big government? The cornerstone of the Republican party?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

The party of small government strikes again.

Pathetic.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

We all knew he would do anything and everything possible to stop the midterms. He knows he will go to prison if he gets impeached and charged, so he is waging a full on war on every right we have.

This november will be very interesting with thousands of DHS gestapo at local voting station intimidating voters, GOP refusing to swear in democratic winners, and the hourly posts by the president telling his cult everything is rigged and they are all going to have to fight for something BS.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You want to nationalize the voting system? Okay, get congressional republicans to submit a bill for an amendment to the constitution, pass it through both houses, institute a constitutional convention, get 2/3 of states to ratify.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›