this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
400 points (99.0% liked)

politics

27817 readers
2750 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Um so there is a document that says that isn’t ok so…

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 1 hour ago

What's with the picture of toilet paper?

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 25 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So no more states rights? Where's all the Republican objectors? Smaller government? 2nd Amendment?

Nothing cause they'v always been fucking cheaters and hypocrites in addition to pedophiles and rapists.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

That's why they're hypocrites and cheats without any honor or deserving of respect.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago

We tried to warn them...

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 165 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

“Republicans ought to nationalize the voting,” Trump told former deputy FBI director and conservative commentator Dan Bongino on his radio show on Monday. “We have states that I won that show I didn’t win. ..."

This shows how he thinks. He has no evidence he won, and cannot have evidence because he didn't win. But a mind like Trump's makes no distinction between what he wants the truth to be and what is the truth. There's no room at all for the notion of being wrong, or the idea that you might need to find out the truth. This is a deeply broken mind.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 hours ago

The rapist mentality

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

No objections from MAGA says more. Fuck Republicans

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's the mindset of a religious extremeist.

Faith-based, motivated reasoning, that is very often utterly delusional.

The exact opposite of critical thinking.

The conclusion is already known, the evidence and reasoning must be made to fit.

As opposed to... the evidence is known, the reasoning must lead to any potential conclusion, and when the body of evidence changes, this neccesitates revision of conclusions.

This is a very serious problem for way, way, waaaay more people than just Trump.

Trump just is his own God, as he is a malignant narcissist, but there are basically around 100 million people minimum in the US whose brains basically operate in this way.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 94 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It's the mind of a spoiled child who's never been told "no".

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

Very familiar for anyone who had had a narcissist in their lifes.

An entire country is in a toxic relationship now.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 65 points 20 hours ago

He hasn't seen ANY consequences yet. Why stop now?

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 19 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

You just described the OS of a narcissist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 131 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There are still many unanswered questions about the Georgia raid, such as why a criminal investigation has been opened into an election that took place six years ago and was audited three times

Someone’s buttfrustrated

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 59 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

So that's why he shat himself on live TV yesterday?

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 26 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

No, that was just the regular Sunday unloading. Most unfortunate that there were people in the room.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. Rarely is anybody in the same room with him who isn't also a POS.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago

Birds of a feather dump togeather?

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 18 hours ago

Allegedly he's been doing it for me than 20 years. He was notorious on the Apprentice.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Liuone@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 79 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

President Trump called on Republicans “to take over the voting in at least 15 places” in advance of the next election

Yeah, that can't happen. We're going to have to stop them. Volunteer to be a poll worker, especially if you happen to live in any of these "15 places." This article doesn't say specifically which places these are, but I think it's safe to assume they are important swing districts.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

Sure. You’ve all done fucking nothing up to this point but NOW you’ll stop him.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They won't need to do anything but put ICE outside the polls in non white neighborhoods. They will do this anywhere they can to intimidate voters. Enough people will not go vote just because of their presence there.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They won't need to do anything but put ICE outside the polls

Then we show up and put ourselves between the polls and ICE.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree. I like that spirit. I'm just telling you the reality that unless ICE (or "election integrity enforcement" or whatever they end up calling it) is not present AT ALL than there will be significantly less voter turnout.

They will also use any organized resistance as a reason to "recount" the votes in that area.

I'm not saying this to be a Doomer. I'm saying this so people prepare. There is no scenario in which the upcoming election is free and fair. We need to be preparing state and local level resistance. A unified and state armed multi state coalition. If the blue state politicians don't move on this. Well, we need to start considering that our state governments are not taking the threat seriously and accept what needs to be done to form a real resistance. ICE will not leave because we brought signs. Alex Pretti had the right idea. But we need the organization of an actual state government to do that.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

A unified and state armed multi state coalition.

That's what they want. The fascists want us to give them a reason to escalate, because escalation will ensure that people stay away from the polls. We need to be organized, we need to be unified and we need to form a real resistance, but we also need to be smart, and that means NOT giving the fascists exactly what they're hoping for.

ICE will not leave because we brought signs.

Signs don't threaten them, that's true, and that's exactly the point. They want us to threaten them, because then they can escalate. We need to be smart. That doesn't mean we need to be ineffectual or passive, it means we need to be very careful about how we proceed.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You are falling for political talking points by weak politicians that do not want to stand up for the people they represent that are being killed and kidnapped. I need you to understand something important. Fascist DO NOT need an EXCUSE to escalate. How do you think we got to SS troops going door to door asking for papers? Was it because of all the escalating excuses we gave them?

Please, we need people like you to not fall for Democrat politicians that are just trying to save themselves.

You also offered no alternative. Your advice to be "careful" is not advice. If you actually had a proposal I'd be interested in discussing that. But you are essentially arguing for doing nothing as the fascist continue to escalate in the face of nothing being done.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

But you are essentially arguing for doing nothing

No, that's not true. I am arguing that we must be smart about what we do. Nonviolence is not the same as doing nothing.

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Have you not been paying any attention?

THEY FUCKING ESCALATE WITHOUT AN EXCUSE ALL THE TIME.

Where is this bullshit "oh guys let's not agitate them it might make it worse"

THERE'S NOT MUCH WORSE THAN LOSING FREE ELECTIONS

ESCALATE. FIGHT. FUCK THEM.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

No. That's exactly what they want. They want us to give them a reason to escalate. If they escalate anyway, then they expose themselves as the violent fascists that they are. That's important. Public perception does matter.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Absolutely agree - many states also pay their poll workers for their time and efforts, I am in a swing state and have served multiple elections since 2020 and yes the shift is a long one but it is very rewarding.

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I feel so afraid for the future.

[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

That's what his bowel movement said at the press event.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 34 points 20 hours ago (4 children)
[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh no, how terrible, I expect that will make all the difference.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 33 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There is no legal justification for the Federal Gov't to take over elections in the US, as that is the purview of the State's, according to the constitution, if I'm not mistaken.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago

The SCOTUS ruled that President David Jefferson Adams can run again. It's quite legal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago (17 children)

It's incredible that americans still believe that they can win peacefully.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 17 hours ago

Voting isn't about winning. They're going to fuck with it. It's about forcing their hand. There are still a lot of people who will turn on them if they prominently destroy free elections. We need to create a situation that can't be denied, particularly by the military brass, that they're breaking their oath of office. It's already obvious, but it isn't coup levels of obvious.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›