this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
314 points (98.2% liked)

News

34899 readers
2830 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 35 minutes ago

I used to go to starbucks 20-25 years ago. I didn't really need the sugar+caffeine+dairy. I enjoyed the 3rd space, a place to chat with friends and acquaintances, or meet someone new. and if I didn't socialize there, I could read a book for a while and feel good about accomplishing that. The majority of the starbucks in my area have become "grab and go" and completely removed the seating area.

Myself, and most people I know, are more health conscious and price conscious than we used to be. It's not worth it anymore.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 1 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

I have an espresso machine with a steaming wand at home and the few times I’ve had Starbucks in the last few years has been disappointing. Guess I’ve learned to steam milk better than the average teenager at a fast food joint. I bet I can microwave a frozen breakfast sandwich better than they can too. Mad skills, yo.😉

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

They over roast their coffee and it tastes burnt to me. I do most of my coffee at home with a french press. I can't justify an espresso machine ($$$) for home though.

Starbucks is just not what it was. Wife gets them for a treat but we bought a kick ass ninja coffee maker and a grinder and have been doing it all at home. The savings allows us to buy the more expensive beans.

Plus I can now buy beans roasted in Canada and not support an American company.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

We're broke lol

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. Cause Starbucks over roasts their coffee to ensure consistency across the brand. It tastes like shit. Gas station coffee is better. You go to Starbucks for the milk shakes made in a coffee shop. You get coffee somewhere else.

[–] dancroissant@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Dunkin is literally better, unless things have changed, their policy was to always have a < 15 minute pot of coffee ready. Any longer and it starts to spoil. Freshly grinded beans and a freshly brewed is probably the single most important part of coffee, inexpensive beans can taste good.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

I prefer Dunkin by a long ways.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

This is true at Starbucks too, the freshness of the brew is not why their coffee is bad. This is the company that sold charcoal as French roast for years before anyone noticed it was so overroasted it tasted like bad fish and ash. (I've never had a more difficult roast to find a pairing for - Smore's is the answer, if anyone cares, to make starbucks french roast not taste awful)

I never understood why they roast it so hard. Who is asking for that?

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Considering I have several actual good roasteries in town and pay the same price? Yeah, fuck the mermaid.

Edit: sp

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago

Wait, you're telling me that when the economy basically collapses, people can't afford their regular coffee flavored morning milkshake?

[–] rozodru@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm old enough to remember that when a Starbucks opened up in a part of the city that was known as being "slightly sketchy" then that area was in the process of starting to go through gentrification. now? at least here in Canada Starbucks is just a more expensive version of Tim Hortons who have some how made it possible for their coffee to taste worse than tims. And that gentrification stuff? nah man no longer applies. You'd be an idiot to go to a starbucks and pulling out your laptop to "work" these days as some fent head will just grab it off you after they wake up from their fade hunched over near the starbucks restrooms.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Growing up I could get good inexpensive coffee at any gas station across the prairies. Thanks Marketing!!

[–] shane@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When was that?

I grew up in the 1970s and 1980s and coffee at gas stations was shit.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

I guess we had different standards? Maybe my gas stations made more fresh coffee than yours? I have come across shitty gas station coffee but that was the exception, not the rule.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

As someone from the PNW, I've ever understood why there were lines at Starbucks here. We have great local coffee stands on basically every block, and they're typically way better and much cheaper.

Right? Even the hit-or-miss family friendly drive thru coffee stands are better most of the time. Hell, if you're like me and only want a mug of tar, the stripper coffee stands are still better than Starbucks.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago
  1. People like being part of trends

  2. People like milkshakes they can deny are milkshakes

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Starbucks coffee tastes burned, not worth their price.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 14 points 19 hours ago

Anti-union strike-breakers are losing business? Say it ain't so.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Starbucks was an amusing rise and fall.

  • Put one on every street-corner, possibly across the street from each other.
  • Run all the other coffee shops out of business
  • Let your stores fail because they can't sustain themselves
  • Competitors notice this, and move in with drive-through-only stores

Of course the competitors are small chains and the original shops were indie, but that's just the free hand of the market fisting some folks without lube

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

They didn't revolutionize coffee culture, they just capitalized on it.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Starbucks has moderately tasty food, and disgustingly bad coffee. If they put enough sugar into it, it's fine... But going elsewhere yields better results.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

The food is gross

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

Dude I live in an armpit of a city and even I can find a small mom and pop shop that sells better food than Starbucks, prepackaged microwaved slopass shit. You gotta have been stuck in the woods chewing on bark to think that shit is tasty.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I haven't had a single good Starbucks experience. The biggest thing for me is that they aren't even cheaper than a local shop. I'm sacrificing quality for what, the "convenience" of using an app to order?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

In perhaps undue fairness to Starbucks:

There was a point in time where there breakfast egg muffin sandwich type things were imo, pretty darn tasty, and reasonably priced.

... That was around a decade ago, iirc.

I've not been to an SBUX in a long time, but that decade ago, they were actually making them or at least heating them in a toaster oven, not microwave, at least when I was physically inside the store.

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

The only food item I moderately liked there was the sous vide egg bites, and even those have gone through enshittification now, costing more and tasting worse.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Americans are pretty fucking disgusted that the CEO of Starbucks takes a private jet to work in Seattle from his home in California. Eat the rich.

Honestly, that's unlikely the reason why. They may be broke or found better coffee places but if Americans voted with their morals than Walmart, Nestle products, and most top brands would also see a dip in revenue

load more comments
view more: next ›