this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
277 points (98.9% liked)

News

34843 readers
3441 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

Dang church got some bad theology going on. Seriously terrible and wretched too.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

No shit. That's why they were there protesting at that church. It wasn't a random location.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 73 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes that is why they were protesting against the church and pastor. Welcome to the party.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago

I still find it hilarious that Protestant churches think you shouldn't be allowed to protest in church. Protestants. Where do you think that name comes from fellas?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Gosh, good thing we arrested Don Lemon for no fucking reason whatsoever.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

Christian Nationalism = Nazism.
Calling it Christian Nationalism is just trying to avoid saying Nazism out loud.

But don't worry, like every other branch of fanatic Christians they have a very strong moral codec.
They will only persecute and kill people they don't like, just as described in the bible.

Hitler absolutely used Christianity too, and believed old texts by Martin Luther about the Jews killing Jesus, almost all the shit the Jews were accused of was based on texts by Martin Luther, from when he got old, and was completely deranged.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Hitler absolutely used Christianity too

In case anyone doubts.

NAZI SS belt buckle. Translation of text, "God is with us."

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

They actually believed that not being a Christian was a sin. They also believed that sin could be inherited, and so ALL the Jews had inherited deadly sin from when Jesus was crucified.

Ironically, evidence today tell us that Jesus Christ is a made up character, the church created to make Christianity more personal and easier to understand.
Which explains the complete lack of reliable historical evidence for the existence of a person that if the stories were true, would be the most important person ever.
But instead all we have is from "Christian scripture" which is nothing more than hear say by anonymous authors, and then some pretty obviously falsified history books.

Nothing of the "ancient remains" owned by the catholic church has stood up to scrutiny. Also the search for evidence of the existence of Jesus Christ, is by far and without comparison the most persistent longest ongoing archaeologic search that has ever been undertaken, when the searches of all Cristian institutions like for instance the Catholic Church and the Mormon Church and even government institutions in medieval times are combined. 2000 years of searching, and no evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ has been found!
Occam's Razor clearly dedicates that the logical conclusion is that he never existed as a real person, but is as made up as Harry Potter.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

Hang on, the Prussians were the first ones to issue the "Gott Mit Uns" belt buckle in 1871 and the West German police used it until the 1970's. The fucking Nazis continued the tradition and God was not with the fucks.

[–] hcf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago

I like to shorten it to 'Cry-Nazis'. You know, seeing as how they love to cry about everything that so much as mildly offends their hwhite "sensibilities".

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Calling it Christian Nationalism is just trying to avoid saying Nazism out loud.

Calling it "Nazis" conjures up very specific images of a foreign government's 1930s fascist party. These are American fascists wrapped up in a very explicitly Christian iconography. You can call them Nazis and people will blink past it, because they don't look like Nazis.

Hitler absolutely used Christianity too

So did FDR. So did Chang Kai-shek. Lincoln and Jefferson both proselytized from office.

But if you want to get to the root of Hitlerism, you'd do better looking at Henry Ford and "The International Jew" than Martin Luther (the OG Protestant). Hitler was a Catholic. He came by antisemitism through the post-WW1 private sector and the old guard aristocracy, which blamed Judaism for the Communist swing of the prior decade.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can call them Nazis and people will blink past it, because they don't look like Nazis.

Not important… but Bovino absolutely dresses like a Nazis.

And many of the CBP agents have Nazis tats.

More generally… Trump himself was recycling Hitler’s rhetoric in his ‘16 campaigns.

So I do feel that it’s both.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Bovino absolutely dresses like a Nazis.

He dresses like a SWAT officer, which has it's own fascist history.

Trump himself was recycling Hitler’s rhetoric in his ‘16 campaigns.

He was recycling Reagan's rhetoric, right down to the MAGA slogan.

But Americans can't handling hearing that Reagan was a fascist. So liberals have to stretch the truth and claim it was Hitler's

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

just for comparison.

also just for clarification Drumpf is a fucking nazis and the shitty american education on the matter is why so many fail to see it. Even though "make germany great again" wasn't exactly a slogan... it was not an uncommon refrain in hitler's speeches. Sure other politicians used 'make xyz great again', but Trump doesn't sleep with their autobiographical manifesto's next to his bedside.

at best, you could say that he's in good company with Reagan also recycling some of hitler's rhetoric, but it's still recycling hitler's rhetoric. Reagan was an asshole, too.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

just for comparison.

They're both wearing heavy coats in cold weather.

Drumpf is a fucking nazis

He's an American fascist doing American fascism in America. He's a fucking Reagan Democrat. He should be called that, because it's a term Americans clearly understand. Whereas, "Nazi" has become a pejorative for anyone with politics you don't like, with the subtle connotation that you're an evil foreigner.

at best, you could say that he’s in good company with Reagan also recycling some of hitler’s rhetoric

Reagan was emulating Eisenhower, another notorious American fascist.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Uhuh.

I wear a heavy coat in winter.

I don’t wear a heavy great coat with giant lapels and epaulet boards and a baldric strap.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Point is many Christians claim Christianity wasn't part of Nazism and that Hitler wasn't a Christian.
But it was absolutely at the very core of Nazism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My head is still trying to connect Christianity to Nationalism without cancelling out.

The Old Testament? Sure. It's basically a nationalism doctrine for the 12 tribes. But when Christ appears? Nope.

Once again, dude was very much against the values of some modern day "Christians". I think it's funny because the Bible even warns of these people being under influence of Satan or even the Antichrist themself.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

My head is still trying to connect Christianity to Nationalism without cancelling out.

Both are primitive tribal behaviors without reasoning.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 31 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ties?

Its the CENTER of christian nationalism.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The Theo Bros fucks would have goose stepped with Hitler.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They would have done so, and done so enthusiastically.

Random fact: The Southern Baptist Convention was founded in 1845.

While you're all thinking back to what was happening in America during that time, I will take a brief context-detour to tell you that SBC is a huge branch (~12M members) of evangelical christianity, which is itself largely the same part of the christian faith that is turning into Christian Nationalism, and yes, that very same SBC was founded in 1845 because they split off from the larger convention of baptists in order to uphold the institution of slavery.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I looooove to remind the Southern Baptists of that as often as possible.

They squirm and deny...but never really have any counter.

[–] metodisto@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

For proof I always like to throw this out there… It only took them 150 years. (I had to take a Baptist history class for a scholarship in undergrad)

SBC Statement

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 22 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

This makes so much sense now. If it was some other religious entity, they probably wouldn’t have done this.

EDIT: It is shocking that any such organization can claim to preach acceptance for all people when they put on their website they hate non-heterosexual people. The mega church where I live has the same thing posted too.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Those kinds of churches very much do not preach acceptance for all people. They're more into the philosophy "if you're not with us you're against us."

Here's a 19th century song that was popular in a very conservative church of Christ where I attended as a teenager:

Onward Christian soldiers!
Marching as to war,
With the cross of Jesus
Going on before.
Christ, the royal Master,
Leads against the foe;
Forward into battle,
See, His banners go!

At the name of Jesus
Satan’s host doth flee;
On then, Christian soldiers,
On to victory!
Hell’s foundations quiver
At the shout of praise:
Brothers, lift your voices,
Loud your anthems raise!

Onward, Christian soldiers!
Marching as to war,
With the cross of Jesus,
Going on before.

There is a long list of people who are unacceptable in the eyes of conservative evangelicals; they label anything they hate or don't understand as "satanic" and make convenient excuses as to why the Bible agrees with them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

My favorite thing is when they call Catholics things like "pagan", LOL.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

The pastor works for ice. Once I heard that this made so much more sense

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

Still has ties, to be clear.

Fuck’n pastor works as St Paul field director for ICE.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago

the pastor works for ICE

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nekiva Levy Armstrong, a Twin Cities civil rights attorney and ordained reverend since 2016, and Monique Cullers, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter Minnesota, were among a group of community activities Tuesday to call for the resignation of David Easterwood as pastor of Cities Church in St. Paul.

They say Easterwood is also the acting field director for ICE in Minnesota. They say it’s a direct conflict of interest for someone in a faith leadership role to also be a leader in immigration enforcement operations.

https://www.fox9.com/news/activists-call-cities-church-pastor-resign-over-ice-leadership-conflict

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They say it’s a direct conflict of interest for someone in a faith leadership role to also be a leader in immigration enforcement operations.

It's hard to have a separation of church and state when the church directly works for the state.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Or is it the other way ‘round? State works for the church.

Which would easterwood put first?

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I could have told you that. What priest that claims to follow Jesus would have any affiliation with those that would destroy their neighbors? Loving your neighbor is literally Jesus' second most important commandment and is supposed to be foundational to Christianity. Heretical blasphemers, the whole lot of them.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Well... yeah

load more comments
view more: next ›