this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
211 points (99.5% liked)

politics

27600 readers
3035 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Deal calls for splitting a funding bill for DHS from a package of other funding bills

Senators have reached a deal to advance a major package of spending bills to avert a partial government shutdown that was set to begin on Saturday.

The office of Chuck Schumer, the Senate’s top Democrat, confirmed the deal calls for splitting a funding bill for the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from a package of other funding bills, and that the deal would fund DHS for two weeks at its current levels.

The deal would avert a partial shutdown that would have affected many of the government’s functions. The House, which is out of session, would have to approve the revised package. The government’s current spending authorizations expire after Friday, while the House in not back until Monday.

The Senate could vote on the deal as soon as Thursday evening. In the House, speaker Mike Johnson, told the Associated Press that he had been “vehemently opposed” to breaking up the funding package, but “if it is broken up, we will have to move it as quickly as possible. We can’t have the government shut down.”

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Why the fucking fuck does that shitty government always shut down?

It seems like only weeks ago it was shut down to get rid of the free/cheap(lol) healthcare.

This is pathetic. A government should never shut down, it's not a fucking burger van. Jesus.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago

Chuck Schumer is a fascist collaborator. I’m so tired of the presumption that he will ever represent any kind of opposition to the republican fascist project.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 23 points 12 hours ago

Holy shit the democrats are a joke

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 32 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So they’re going to break off the DHS funding for a separate, later conversation instead of doing an extended shutdown. Gee, where have we seen this brilliant strategy before.

FFS, someone primary Schumer he is absolutely a toxic enabler of fascism.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

So they just gave up their leverage?

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 116 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Man can't wait to see them shut it down for 2 weeks to then get absolutely nothing for it again.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

They don't want to even dismantle ICE all they wanna do is change who's in charge.

I fucking wish we had an opposition party in America

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago

Yeah why do they think he won't just put some other asshole in there?

These people all need to go. This is a shit government and it should be ended if they aren't working for us anymore

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 15 hours ago

They would settle for simply doing more training or identification. You know things they try with the police which has been extremely effective at wasting more money

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I suspect if the government shuts down for two weeks, what you’ll get is a lot of Americans in the streets.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Don't tempt me with a good time.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago

You’re not the boss of me 😜

[–] RyanDownyJr@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

We shutdown for a month last year. Another two weeks isn't too much more.

To my understanding the people hurt the most were the poor on food aids last year. This time it's more federal programs that will be hurt. I would think this shutdown won't hurt the common person as much? But I'm an illiterate idiot, please teach me.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No one’s going to lose SNAP benefits tho. And DC workers will be paid.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 17 hours ago

Come on. Neither of those things were supposed to happen last time either. Holding back the SNAP benefits and not paying DC workers were both patently breaking the law and how it's structured and every agency bent over and did it for Trump anyway.

Sick of people pretending that they won't do the cruel shit because "it's not allowed." They keep doing it and getting away with it even though it's not allowed!

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Last time was over a month

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yah sure. But no way they will stay strong enough for that again.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

He will do as Israel commands

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Fucking worthless Democrats.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 12 hours ago

So great to have the Dems help calibrate the goon squad to be more palatable to the public.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 12 hours ago

The office of Chuck Schumer, the Senate’s top Democrat, confirmed the deal calls for splitting a funding bill for the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from a package of other funding bills, and that the deal would fund DHS for two weeks at its current levels.

There's the spineless Democrats that we all know and love.

[–] Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip 10 points 13 hours ago

Body cameras are going to help make us safer, they wouldn't want their murders caught on camera. You can tell that by the way one of them took the trouble to use his cell phone to film him murdering a woman. Ohhhh...

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago

They'll cave. They aren't doing this because they think it's the right thing to do, they're doing it to keep their jobs. They weren't even interested in the idea of blocking DHS funding until the uproar about the latest ICE murder was louder than they anticipated, so now they'll act like they care, at least for a couple weeks until they cave.

Idiot spineless assholes.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago

Yet we're still supposed to support these old jackasses who refuse to just drop dead where they'll find better use as maggot food.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Schumer won't let them have a dime without body cameras and retraining. That will surely solve the problem!

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 9 points 13 hours ago

They wanted to give them more money!

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Headline is straight up lies. They literally said they would fund DHS on a temporary basis to buy time to discuss ICE reforms

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Let's fund it so we have more time to stop funding it!

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

And it works, look at the comment you replied to and how many people think it's a good point.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Does the DHS funding also require 60 votes? Or is that gonna just be a majority vote that Dems can be like “sEe iTs NoT us!”?

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 14 points 17 hours ago

Reforms? No. Abolish ICE and the entire DHS.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

A DHS funding package that Democrats in the house passed to get in front of the Senate.

All of this is nothing more than a complete failure of democratic leadership.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Shut it all down for as long as we need. Stop shopping for anything but essentials. Update your W2 and stop paying income taxes. Put that change into an overseas avings account, JIK. Every strategic day at work...PTO...every AI project....drag it out and produce terrible results. Oooohhhh we should all take out money out of the banks...cash out your 401ks ....this is not just going to fade away. People need to start to prepare for what comes next.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

I mean, good. Now don't compromise

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 15 hours ago

Sadly they will do neither, just use it for fundraising