this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
645 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

18326 readers
1317 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baropithecus@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we sure dinosaurs didn't have F15s?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes but only because McDonald Douglas didn't exist yet. If you do find evidence of them having jet aircraft we might be able to invalidate some patents under prior art.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

afaik, patents don't care about that. You can even patent things that don't exist.

Brb gonna go patent my own self worth in case it ever comes into existence.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

You can but in practise you would have an immensely hard time enforcing that.

People have taken patents out for FTL drives but if one is ever invented it would be pretty difficult to claim that they have the rights to the invention.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You stay away from my patents on wookie slippers that look like human feet.

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How’s he gonna operate the stick with those lil’ arms though?

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same way he's getting around those back plates and thagomizer:

Life, uh... finds a way.

[–] Ixoid@aussie.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

+1 for the thagomiser

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Well, yours was a little stick in little hands...

[–] Klear@quokk.au 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Their arms were about the same length as human arms. I don't see any issues with that picture.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So you're saying Its more "where is he gonna put that thicc dino ass"

[–] GandalftheBlack@feddit.org 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought this was about the grass until I actually looked at the dinosaurs in the picture

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

Huh, yeah the grass is also inaccurate

[–] plyth@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What made evolution accelerate that dinosaur evolution took so long, but turning little mammals into humans was fast?

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mass extinctions promote rapid expansion and diversification of surviving species into newly available niches.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

There's also a Hypothesis iirc that this rapid expansion also lowered our life span. Longevity Bottleneck Hypothesis though I think this one includes dinosaurs hunting mammals, and maybe Disposable Soma Theory.

Huh, the second one could probably be used to explain elves in fantasy: long life, low reproduction rate.

[–] betahack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

imagine the roach empires that will rise once we do ourselves in

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From the last dinosaurs to the first humans was 66 million years, it wasn't that fast.

What is weird is that humans are so intelligent. It's much easier to evolve big teeth and ripping claws to make you the dominant species then it is to evolve a highly complex brain.

It can't have been the extinction of the dinosaurs that had that impetus because by the time the first proto humans were around any effects of the asteroid impact would have long since dissipated. So there must have been some other threat that arose that was dangerous enough to require us to evolve to survive it, but was slow burning enough that it gave time for that evolution to happen. It also left no evidence.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

It's because Ancient Aliens came and gave us knowledge to speed up the growth of our early civilizations.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think theres growing consensus that tool use itself led to us becoming more intelligent, basically the group of great apes that humans and chimps came from that led to humans started to use tools at increasing rates which caused a feedback loop. Tools allow better resource exploitation while conserving energy and gaining more energy this basically caused evolution to throw everything into the dump stat that is intelligence which further worsened the feedback loop.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 4 points 23 hours ago

Ditching our thagomizers for the ability to craft giant iron flails.

Min-maxing to ruin the game for everyone.

[–] stormdelay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

A large meteorite

[–] saimen@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

What about this?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

If that's a Tomcat, where's that lizard's RIO?

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Chronologically, sure. But are years really the appropriate measure of accuracy here? Biological evolution moves a lot slower than cultural or technological evolution does.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hold on. Dinosaurs might of had like some kind of post communist utopian society. They might have been more culturally developed than humans.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried asking a geologist this question once and just got a funny look.

But let's say for the sake of arguement that dinosaurs did have a civilisation, if that civilisation was on the level of mediaeval technology then would there be any evidence after millennia and an asteroid impact? If we're talking about houses made of wood and roads made of cobblestone and no refined metals, would we be able to tell?

There's an idea that they may have been prior civilisations but they will wiped out and never left any evidence. It would certainly explain why humans are so much more intelligent than the rest of the animals. We aren't actually special at all, we are just the latest iteration of biological inevitability.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its a frequent idea but I don't think there's any supporting evidence from people I've talked to.

I think if a small community existed with houses, it might be permanently unknowable. If a widespread civilization with stone and wood construction existed we would certainly have found some evidence.

Though I think stone and wood construction came very late even for humans. I don't remember my anthropology class well but its suggested based on hunter gatherers humans often had a sort of nomadic foraging/hunting society until about 10,000 years ago when permanent agricultural settlements started developing.

Like humans are kind of weak and soft, we walk funny, we're omnivorous endurance pack hunters and fishers. Like in terms of mammals we're very weird. In the larger animal kingdom we're pretty weird but maybe not as weird as like mollusks, birds, and crabs where evolution also seemed to have done a series of back-to-back rapid changes in evolutionary pressure by sort of creating and occupying an uninhabited niche in the environment.

I especially am fond of the idea that like "crabification" there's like a "birdification" and a "hominidification" evolutionary process based on occupying a series of vacant ecological niches that step into each other. So if something like that is true it might be more visible in the fossil record.

New conspiracy theory just dropped. Capitalists killed the dinosaurs to hide what communism can accomplish.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Looking at the state of the world… you might be right.