this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
658 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

21193 readers
4725 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 23 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

I never understood the most basic, fundamental point of Christianity - how does Jesus getting crucified forgive my sins? Is it some sort of ancient Christian bar bet?

"Oh, you think it's so easy? You get crucified, and if you really do it, I'll forgive everybody's sins."

"That's bullshit. You won't do that."

"I'll go you one better - I'll forgive their sins forever.

All right, you got a bet!"

If I committed a murder, that murder doesn't just go away just because some random, third party person died somewhere, 2000 years ago. My victim is still dead, the family is still sad, and I'm still a murderer.

The next time I'm in front of a judge, can I claim my crimes are already absolved because a guy died long ago? Of course not, I'm going to jail. The government doesn't buy that story because it makes no sense, and I'm not buying it either.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

how does Jesus getting crucified forgive my sins? Is it some sort of ancient Christian bar bet?

Speaking as someone literally brought up in a cult like environment, it's just one of the many nonsense word-salad doctrines that people live by when those people were never able to separate their feelings from their world. IE: there is a segment of the population who do not have a distinction between an outside world, separate from their feelings about it.

This is a reflection of how the brain works at a most basic level. It's not a logic tool for reasoning out problems, not by default at least. It's default instruction state is to assemble experiences and associations to write a story to explain how you feel, and it doesn't actually have objective understanding about the world, so those stories do not need to make sense.

When you really, truly internalize and digest this fact, you will understand so much about yourself and others. You can overcome some depressive episodes and know how to make people like you, how to manage addiction and unhealthy behavior and how to avoid being manipulated by others, and so much more. It's vastly important we understand this about our brains.

You have to actually train your brain to actually analyze and understand the world around you in a way that shows you how you and the world relate to each other. Most people don't do this work, but brains are good enough at taking advantage of your environment that they can still get through life... but it leaves a lot of room for huge errors in reasoning. In fact, it's not conscious reasoning at all, it's story-building followed by total acceptance of this story without question because you think it's you reasoning, but it's just how your brain weaves narratives in your mind.

So for the people who never learned this distinction, they just feel a thing, and then either let their brains assemble a story to explain it, or they latch onto someone else's supplied story. This is how people are manipulated on mass scales.

"Jesus died for your sins" makes no logical sense, but it's not meant to, it's meant to make you feel like something is being done about the thing you worry most about, if you're going to see your loved ones again in heaven. That's a paralyzing fear for almost every human who's ever lived. Our awareness of death has opened a huge vulnerability in our reasoning skills and caused us more death and harm than if we didn't worry about it so much.

Once you have a McGuffin that makes you feel protected from this thing you fear most, you are more likely to reinforce and build further narratives around this idea to protect it. To not protect it, to dismantle it and try to figure it out is literally painful to many people, because it invites in the question... What if you're wrong?" and even approaching that question makes people who have never processed these emotions absolutely fall apart.

edit: I want to add one thing, that the more you think about the really hard thing, your inevitable end, it becomes easier to accept and make peace with. Especially as you get older and more aware of your own limitations and realize you're kinda stuck on rails in this life. There is no bigger story or experience you will miss out on.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

Truly excellent post, and a special thumbs up to the use of McGuffin in this context.

You are describing Critical Thinking Skills, something that gives people the ability to recognize and dismiss propaganda, among other things. Critical Thinking is how we are meant to process information, and without it, people substitute the kind of chaotic thinking you describe.

Conservatives recognize Critical Thinking Skills as dangerous to their important propaganda machine, so controlling education, and suppressing the overt teaching of Critical Thinking Skills is an important on going mission.

I was lucky to have three years in high school with a subversive English teacher that used his subject to teach us Critical Thinking Skills, and hone them. I didn't recognize what he had been up to until years later, and I was so pleased that he was so much more subversive than I ever knew.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's based on the old idea of offering sacrifices to atone for sins. Do bad thing, sacrifice a dove or whatever to God to make up for it.

The idea is that God decided to do away with the sacrifice system using said system, by sending and then accepting a sacrifice great and pure enough to wipe the slate clean forevermore - his own self/son.

I've heard that it hits people from cultures where they do still sacrifice for every sin particularly hard - we might not have the frame of reference to really get this fully anymore.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 19 minutes ago

Excellent perspective.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Well I am an atheist myself, but the key is that in the old testament god gave every human the blame for the original sin.

And the special thing with Jesus dying and taking all sins with him is, that now god won't hate every human just because Adam and Eve stole some fruits.

This some weird story but yeah. Basically after Jesus god wasn't that angry anymore.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Okay so he's not angry with me over what my grandparenta did, but he can still be angry with me in particular?

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] anelephant@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Well written

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah it would have been way easier for the apparently all good, all knowing, all powerful god to just, you know, forgive us, but that wouldn't have made for a good book

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It makes a lot more sense if you view it as a human sacrifice to appease the god(s).

Humans have created many religions where some poor sod has to get murdered to satisfy some god or Pantheon of gods. Christianity is no different.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, the entire religion is based on a human sacrifice. Wholesome.

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

It's easier to understand in the context of the past when they had things like sacrificing a goat for stuff. It's just another form of ritual sacrifice.

[–] Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The entire concept of “salvation” in Christianity is is dynamic, and has changed again and again over the centuries. Jesus was very likely a Jewish Apocalypticist - his message was that the end was near, and God’s justice was close at hand for the unrighteous. And after this was accomplished, God’s kingdom on earth would reign. The “salvation” Jesus refers to here is almost certainly salvation from the upcoming apocalypse - follow him, and you’ll make it through to see the Kingdom.

But then Jesus died. Even though he died, what we know from studying all sorts of religions and cults in history, is that death is often not the end. But the followers of Jesus had to evolve their thinking. So they came up with idea that, even though Jesus had just been killed, he would return again - and soon! To them, of course, soon meant soon. It’s why Paul talks about how marriage is pointless because there isn’t much time left. When this second coming never happened, and the decades rolled on, who Jesus was and what his followers were to be “saved” from changed. At this point the religion is gaining followers all across the Roman Empire. However, as different cultures find Jesus, Christianity itself incorporated ideas from these cultures. One such idea was the concept of an eternal hell of torment - something that was largely unknown in Judaism (outside of sects that had previously been influenced by Hellenism).

Eventually, the Church emerges and certain concepts of salvation become more formalized and standardized. These largely serve the interested of the feudal church - making the masses stay in line. Then you have Protestantism emerge not coincidentally with the emergence of capitalism, and Protestant notions of salvation that serve the interests of capital. Fast forward to today’s White Evangelical Christianity, where salvation only entails a sort of mental assent to a historical event (Jesus’ death). What you actually do - good or bad (like helping the poor) - is largely irrelevant to your eternal status. What matters is being in the “in group” that demands conformity when it comes to various socio-political concepts (abortion, homosexuality, et al).

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 20 minutes ago

Good one. A multi-millennial game of telephone, with the original message being fucked up in the first place. No wonder it has evolved to this.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

"Father, I apologize. I was wrong."

[–] flemtone@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So wait.... God saved us by killing himself to save us from himself ?!?!?!?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Well... he saved us by making us kill him so he can forgive us for not listening to his orders.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 8 points 16 hours ago

Trinity is messed up in so many wonderful ways tbh

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't it wierd that ultimately Christianity is all about finding that one perfect human sacrifice to stop god being pissed at us.

[–] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Very succinctly put

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Really tho... It's a story that repeats endlessly. Blameless young person is murdered by the state for speaking the truth.

The religious stuff is a distraction from the actual politics.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Dude was a cult leader who broke up families and disrupted people attending religious ceremonies. The bible is effectively cult propaganda and it still reveals that.

[–] GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 hours ago (4 children)
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What an idiotic strawman.

It isn't that "this argument wouldn't work on me", you addlepated twit, it's that I WOULDN'T NEED SUCH AN ARGUMENT, LET ALONE THE THREAT OF ETERNAL DAMNATION, TO CONVINCE ME TO DO GOOD, and anyone who does require such a threat is a bad person, kept from committing heinous acts only by fear of retribution, and is worthy of contempt. Full stop.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

Christians hate it when you argue against their beliefs AND when you argue for their beliefs.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Matthew 25:36-40 has Jesus being pretty explicit about his followers being called to feed the hungry and comfort the sick.

I have a lot of respect for Christians who understand their Christianity and Jesus’s sacrifice as an obligation to take up the cross and follow him. I don’t have a lot of respect for “Christians” whose belief system solely amounts to their pastor telling them that god hates gays.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

"picture of wojak face": how dare you use my purported believes against me. Everyone knows that I can pick and chose what parts of infallible word of a literal god I believe in at any point in time, it's actually you who's hypocritical because you don't share my believes therefore can't talk about mine.

[–] mrsemi@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

"I saved you from being sent to hell."

"Wait, who was going to send me to hell?"

"I was"

"..."

"Praise and worship pls, I suffered a lot for this."

[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

God is also called father, for he is the Godfather of Godfathers, and your protection money is due.

You know, when you phrase it like that Jesus sounds a lot like Donald Trump..

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›