this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
262 points (91.5% liked)

politics

29593 readers
1382 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 116 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Copium up!

trump isn't panicking for shit. He's fucking demented. He goes from confused to arrogant to rageaholic and back again using special words he invented or whatever the last guy who just spoke said. That's it. There's no panic in there. That would imply cognitive function.

I'd like to believe this is bad news for him but it just isn't. He's completely unaffected and there is still much more destruction of America that he will inflict.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Don't worry its a suppository

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago
[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Anything is if you're brave enough.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

For all the good suppositories do me, I might as well jam them up my ass.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Uhmmmm but he can identify animals quite well on his cognitive tests.....

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

"Sir, those are pigs."

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 65 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Orange sociopath would like a more PR-friendly series of kidnappings and murders, please and thank you

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

I think that is literally what he is asking for. His base loves it when cops shoot black people and disappears Mexicans.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Please stop posting meaningless crap articles with "panics", "losing support", "wildly unpopular", "regrets voting for trump", anything about them dropping n the polls, etc. etc. It's all fake crap to make anti-fascists feel good and falsely think they are somehow winning.

No. They aren't panicking, they are proceeding with their plans full speed ahead and doing whatever they want with impunity. They still have just as much support from the magats as always, and every magat would still happily vote for trump again.

Don't post these and downvote the ones you see.

For real. Even If this was a genuine moment of weakness, that just means everyone needs to push all the harder. Grind this piece of shit and his entire regime so deep into the ground that future generations will take it as a warning.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

According to the internal polling, a staggering 60% of independent voters disapproved of Trump’s immigration policy

I sense the word, "staggering," has received a new definition, coz 60% is not staggering in the 2024 sense.

The private polling was completed at the end of December, just days before ICE fatally shot Minnesota woman Renee Good

Alright, that might make a dent in the 40% supporting this shit show.

As recourse for the abysmal polling numbers, an individual [...] advocated for members of the Trump administration to make appearances [...] to promote the “positive” aspects of Trump’s immigration policy, the outlet.

I could definitely see how an appearance by chief screeching howler monkey Miller or head cash bag grabber Homan would explain to us how this is all Very Normal and Good for the Nation. /s

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's not 60% of all voters. That's 60% of people who aren't Democrats. Which is already a minority of voters. Trump needs 90% of his base because he gets 0% of everyone else.

Think about it. He got half the vote. Now he is getting a disapproval rating from more than half of that half. If that holds true they are going to lose every single race in the mid terms and for the foreseeable future.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

lose every single race in the mid terms and for the foreseeable future.

don't be too sure. they've spent every waking moment since 2020 taking over election boards, gerrymandering, and otherwise double-re-fucking the election process to try and prevent them ever losing again. in my own state, the state board of elections was promptly overrun by deep R trump loyalists, and have proceeded to cut polling locations in every county in the state, which does literally nothing but hurt the D voter--not only because of access, but that also makes it easier for them to send "monitors" to "watch" the polling, who i'm sure won't really be there to intimidate people

i wish i was more optimistic, but i'm not the same person i was on 11/4/2024

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But they're assuming they're base won't leave when doing those gerrymandering things. This is why he is talking about cancelling midterms. Gerrymandering with no base is worse than no gerrymandering. He'll lose a bigger area.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it's not just the votes

included a provision written behind closed doors with no public scrutiny that would make it easier for judges to throw out election results. Under the plan, losing candidates would no longer have to prove that individual fraudulent votes swung the election but rather that the number of allegedly fraudulent votes exceeded the margin of victory

Other GOP-controlled states have already changed their laws to make it easier to void election results. As part of its sweeping voter suppression law, Georgia’s heavily gerrymandered legislature removed Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger as the chair and a voting member of the state election board after he rebuffed Trump’s attempt to overturn Joe Biden’s victory. The legislature will now appoint a majority of board members, and the board, in turn, can take over up to four county election boards it deems “underperforming”—raising the prospect that Republicans could assume control of election operations in heavily Democratic areas like Atlanta’s Fulton County. In concert with a provision allowing right-wing groups to mount an unlimited number of challenges to voter eligibility, these changes will make it easier for Republicans to contest close elections and possibly overturn the results.

long story short: the end goal was always to make it so that state election boards (all R, of course) can just call the winner, regardless of the actual voting results

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/06/14-gop-controlled-states-have-passed-laws-to-impede-free-elections/

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But those state election boards have to survive too. They have to live amongst the people that hate what's going on? I'm not sure. I'm also not saying you're wrong. I just don't know.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

have to live amongst the people that hate what’s going on?

i don't think so. you don't attain to a position that high in the state government without having resources/connections (read fucktons of money), which means you don't have to live around or even look at the poors

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, most of them are really really stupid, so there's that.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

progressive people want someone who's smarter than themselves to lead. conservatives want someone who's exactly as dumb as they are. which is, as you say: really really fucking pants-on-head stupid

this is also why words like "progress," "education," "expert," even "science" have become pejoratives to them

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

The Regime might have a generous vacation policy for their election boards. A free trip to Mar-a-Lago or Alligator Alcatraz, depending on your affiliation.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That's not quite it either. It's 60% of independent voters, so it also doesn't include MAGA. It's the swing voters, which happen to be the only voters who really matter.

But, fortunately for the GOP, they're also easily swayed by the "both sides" narratives and can be disillusioned into staying home instead of voting. It's why voter turnout is one of the biggest predictors in whether the Dems or the GOP will win an election. Independent voters have trended more leftward in recent elections because the GOP is fucking insane.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] baines@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

the article is clickbait trash

I can’t see why this would matter to the usual basket of deplorables any more than the litany of prior horrors

[–] manxu@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I hear you, but the difference is that this woman was white and suburban. She looked like them, that's dangerous.

[–] baines@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

they already wrote her off as lgbt

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Not a factor because these polls were done last year

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But how do they feel about shooting white ladies in the face?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Based on the vibes, I'm gonna guess "similar"

[–] baines@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

clearly they should have known their place /s

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Depends. What's her sexual orientation?

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As recourse for the abysmal polling numbers, an individual [...] advocated for members of the Trump administration to make appearances [...] to promote the “positive” aspects of Trump’s immigration policy, the outlet.

I would love to hear the positive aspects of a government funded terror campaign against its own people.

Job market is slowing. Prices of everything are up. The US is burning international bridges like kindling. Fascist pedos are running the US. POTUS is "joking" about not having elections and threatening to invoke the insurrection act.

Reality is this:

And they want to tell people it is this:

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

They will just race bait. Somali's are defrauding your government. Hatian's are eating your cats and dogs again. Venezualian's are all gang members and/or from insane asylums. Mexican's are bringing in drugs. Greenlander's won't let me buy them.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

The title is shit. Trump does not give two flying fucks.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

A batch of private GOP polling data obtained by Axios revealed that President Donald Trump’s mass deportation policy is wildly unpopular with independent and undecided voters

Bullshit clickbait:

  1. The headline is clearly trying to imply that Republicans are the ones not supporting the policy
  2. No sign of Trump 'panicking' whatsoever
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

More like he continues his plans to cancel the midterm elections after seeing poll results.

edit: I just heard the post office employees just got fresh email messages that they were allowed to move during and work through any government curfews.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It doesn't matter. Even if it's unpopular and they hate it the republikkkans will ALWAYS VOTE FOR IT. Shitler is ruining their lives, but would they vote for him again? Yes without a single doubt.

Pathetic fucking scumbags and pedo-protectors. To a one.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I'm just here for my daily "fuck polls, I hate polls" comment.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago

Rawstory editor giving out assignments like “ok type ‘trump panics’ and let autocomplete finish the headline”

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Suicide is always an option.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I am convinced that polling is completely broken. There's no methodology that works anymore because scam callers have basically destroyed telephones as an information-gathering resource and online polling is very easily compromised.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

This is for discussion, but this is what I could find on Hitler and his popularity since they didn't really take polls like we do now.

The March 1933 federal election was the final democratic election before WWII – in which the Nazi party received 43.91% of the vote.

Peter Fritzsche deciphers the puzzle of Nazism’s ideological grip. Its basic appeal lay in the Volksgemeinschaft — a “people’s community” that appealed to Germans to be part of a great project to redress the wrongs of the Versailles treaty, make the country strong and vital, and rid the body politic of unhealthy elements. The goal was to create a new national and racial self-consciousness among Germans. For Germany to live, others—especially Jews—had to die.

https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/50963/how-did-attitudes-of-german-citizens-toward-hitler-and-the-nazi-party-change-ove

[–] Bindel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

So paying millions for chat gpt to come up with a plan for him isn’t working?

load more comments
view more: next ›