1960
submitted 1 year ago by MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MasterNerd@lemm.ee 216 points 1 year ago

Kinda weird that they're calling it an OS, but ig they're just trying to cater to the windows audience

[-] killerinstinct101@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

KDE neon is what they're selling

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Selling as in advertising, I might add. Neon is free

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GustavoM@lemmy.world 188 points 1 year ago

"But can Linux install things via a single .exe file? HAHAH EAT IT NERD!"

- 10'ish years ago past me, before discovering the magical wonders of the package manager

[-] RQG@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

I found since people are used to app stores, I've had a much easier time convincing people to try out Linux. My mom even said that she always wished her windows PC had a proper app store.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's still important to explain the key difference between an "app store" and a package repository: the latter isn't a "store" because everything is free.

[-] RQG@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

True but it helps get the concept across so much.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] embed_me@programming.dev 47 points 1 year ago

With app images it's easier than installing. Although the chmod step will deter the typical windows user

[-] Kierunkowy74@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

What chmod step?

When I clicked on new app image, the OS told me, that program /name of app/ will be launched, I clicked "Continue" and it runs! No meddling with "chmod" or anything like that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 148 points 1 year ago

Windows 11 takes your money, gives you ads, sells your information and ignores your bug reports and feature requests

KDE is free, ad-free and open to contribution

I think we have a clear winner here

[-] desconectado@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But can it run proprietary software used in the industry? From Excel to Photoshop, if you are in a collaborative professional environment, you can't run away from those, and don't tell me you can use the alternatives in Linux, because no, you can't. This is not linux fault, but it's still an issue you can't handwave.

I love linux, but you can't expect people to adopt it just because it's objectively better than windows.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] ultra@feddit.ro 22 points 1 year ago

Not to mention free as in freedom.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 100 points 1 year ago

Linux is the modern OS and windows is just a bunch of old shitty technology in a trench suit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago

So basically ever since I first tried Windows 7 I held it as the "Gold standard" for desktop OS's. Half my tweaks to Windows 10 were trying to get it as close to Win7 as I possibly could.

When I finally start experimenting with Linux early this year KDE quickly got me to reconsider my "Gold standard" and finally switch my main machine fully to Linux.

No regrets and certainly ain't switching back even if Microsoft gave me updated Windows 7 with every extra feature I wanted back then.

[-] Patch@feddit.uk 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been a Linux user for a decade and a half now, but still use Windows on my corporate laptops. Honestly, it's baffling how Microsoft seem to consistently manage to miss the mark with the UI design. There's lots to be said about the underlying internals of Windows vs Linux, performance, kernel design etc., but even at the shallow, end user, "is this thing pleasant to use" stakes, they just never manage to get it right.

Windows 7 was...fine. It was largely inoffensive from a shell point of view, although things about how config and settings were handled were still pretty screwy. But Windows 8 was an absolutely insane approach to UI design, Windows 10 spent an awful lot of energy just trying to de-awful it without throwing the whole thing out, and Windows 11 is missing basic UI features that even Windows 7 had.

When you look at their main commercial competition (Mac and Chromebook) or the big names in Linux (GNOME, KDE, plenty of others besides), they stand out as a company that simply can't get it right, despite having more resources to throw at it than the rest of them put together.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 year ago

To me it's absurd how Microsoft gets beaten by a free desktop environment when windows is like their main product. They have billions of dollars. How do they manage to not do better?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 67 points 1 year ago

Plasma is not a system, but I see how they didnt want to confuse people here

[-] oce@jlai.lu 38 points 1 year ago

It is a desktop environment system.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Microsoft will probably never truly catch up with KDE

[-] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

Plasma 6 is approaching fast

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago

In the newest windows, it is even possible to hover the volume icon and change it with the mouse wheel!!!

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 36 points 1 year ago

Does clicking on it open the mixer, or still the useless menu which should be accessible with a right click instead?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

KDE had that pretty much since the invention of the mouse wheel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago

KDE is the best desktop environment.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

To be fair, forcing a bunch of software on the machine users own was never a good move, and in my opinion, not a new normal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Titou@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

not a kde user but huge respect to them

[-] heygooberman@lemmy.today 27 points 1 year ago

It's not my primary driver, but I would gladly choose KDE over Windows.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

I came back to KDE after a long absence because I never liked it back in the day (I found it ugly and bloated). I was really surprised by how good it has become. It's now my favourite desktop environment on Linux, and I'm looking forward to version 6. So to any other oldies still avoiding KDE because of how it used to be, it's worth another look.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Fully based

[-] micnd90@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago
[-] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

What's the current reliable KDE Distro? I've been rolling with Kububtu for a while now, but Ubuntu's Snap mandate has been getting annoying.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have been enjoying OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. It's a rolling distro unlike the Ubuntu and Debian derivatives, but the updates hardly ever cause problems and it's very easy to roll them back if they do. It also gives you a choice between X11 and Wayland, and Wayland is working well for me on Intel graphics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] kshade@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

KDE nerds: Is there a way to get a normal app launch indicator (cursor with a loading icon/hourglass) instead of either nothing or the little hopping icons that don't animate right?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] yoz@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago

What's plasma ? Is it a browser? Sorry, I dont understand computers

Unlike Windows and MacOS, the Linux ecosystem is a lot more modular. For example, graphical user interfaces. There are a few types, ranging from ruthlessly simple tiling window managers to more complex desktop environments that more closely resemble the Windows or MacOS experience.

Linux users may take their pick between about a dozen desktop environments (DEs), including Gnome, Cinnamon, Mate, xfce and LXQT.

KDE (once standing for Kool Desktop Environment, now merely KDE) is a community/organization that produces open source software. They made Krita, a raster art program, KDENLIVE, a video editor, and many other such utilities. They also make the Plasma desktop environment, which is often referred to simply as "KDE" by distro maintainers. For example, you might download Fedora GNOME or Fedora KDE.

KDE Neon is an operating system maintained by KDE which features the Plasma desktop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
1960 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

48623 readers
1434 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS