this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
93 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

19068 readers
861 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fake videos show frustrated, unmarried, childless middle-aged women crying and venting in hospital hallways about their life choices.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 35 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

My parents and extended family: "why don't you find a nice girl to [blah blah blah]"

Me: "haha yes I'll get right on that"

Me: having mega gay sex in addition to actively not wanting children, even if I was medically a good candidate to father them

Parents/extended: "I just don't understand"

Me: upgrades to ultra mega gay sex

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what is the second level upgrade or evolution?

asking for a friend

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 31 minutes ago

it goes gay, gayra, gayraga, gayraja

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 10 minutes ago

I imagine that Xi probably doesn't care all that much whether you're having mega gay sex, but I expect that he is very interested in whether you are also employing that dingus in ways more-conducive to sustaining future state output.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

How is life in China actually? There must be a reason people don't want children. I imagine work culture, bad pay, bad prospects, and inability to secure housing are top among the reasons.

[–] one_step_behind@quokk.au 1 points 23 minutes ago

I believe China has too much housing right now. But the rest seems to be reason enough.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Parents (not being able to tell the videos are AI-generated): "See this? This will be you in 30 years if you don't get married and have kids very soon!"

Kids (able to see the videos are visit AI-generated): "Suuuuure!"

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 52 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Shaming people into having kids works so well

They rush to have children who are then cherished and not resented

/s

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The one child policy really gonna be up there with killing all the sparrows long term...

It was in place 45 years and only gone a decade.

You can't just flip a cultural switch and expect them to become bunnies overnight. And that's not even getting into the economic part.

Kids are fucking expensive.

When workers aren't paid well, people stop having kids. That shrinks labor supply in a generation, workers can command enough pay to have kids, and population will stabilize.

The wealthy hate populations dropping, because they have the luxury to plan ahead and know eventually it leads to more powerful workers.

It's why it's a constant boogeyman and reproduction has been prioritized thru virtually all of recorded human history.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The one child policy really gonna be up there with killing all the sparrows long term...

Except that killing the sparrows was a bad idea.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

Getting rid of pests was the problem, and it was a real one...

Killing all the sparrows was a legitimate attempt to help that backfired.

Overpopulation was and still is a problem.

One child would have theoretically been managed, but ignored how people act individually and the desire to have a son. An honest and legitimate attempt to mitigate a real problem backfired.

I feel it's an apt comparison, even if I didn't explain enough at first

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Yeah… the difference is that one (sparrows) was just a bad idea due to a total misunderstanding of the problem. The sparrows weren’t the pests, the bugs they eat were.

The other (one child) is a good idea that was poorly managed due to unexpected cultural mores. Even so it would still be effective once people are “incentivized” to give up on the foolishness of prioritizing one sex over the other.

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 26 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What ghouls. Let people live the lives they want.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

what if being shitty to their kids how they want to live ?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

AI is a shit show.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago

Nice to know the ungodly toxic, overbearing and boundryless parent is a universal phenomenon.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 11 points 1 hour ago

Why would anyone in their right mind bring a child into this chaos right now? Humans probably need a good ole fashioned hard reset. First we need to fix oil dependency and the climate. That's a start.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Maybe work on fixing that 16% youth unemployment rate, think that'll work a lot better then showing them slop

[–] snader@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Absolutely unhinged lol

china's long history of controlling their ~~citizens’~~ prisoners’ reproduction

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Have a feeling this will backfire simply because comedy