underisk

do you consider apartheid a political scandal?

AI to a layman just means "LLMs and Generative AI that rich assholes keep trying to force me to use or consume the output of". i dont think its worthwhile to split semantic hairs over this. call the "good" stuff CNNs or machine learning if you really feel the need to draw a distinction.

Pretty on the nose that the Israeli spyware company named their spyware after what we call people who sexually assault children.

It’s true I saw a video of it online and it was horrific. They’re so numb to this they treat it like a tourist attraction.

Didn’t he very publicly advertise he would pay people to vote republican? I seem to remember this happening during the campaigning and nobody did shit about it then. Why would the result be any different now when the only politicians who nominally oppose the “destruction of democracy” didn’t do shit about that either and no longer have any power?

I don’t really care if they’re just interns when their job is to launder the reputation of a murderous immoral multinational corporation. If they had done PR for Nazis that would have made them Nazis.

“Just don’t let my ex know where I am I owe her tons in child support”

Unless you're based in or have some kind of presence in those countries there's no reason to even ban them. Banning by geolocation isn't exactly trivial or reliable. Let them figure out a way to ban you instead.

You can self host stoat.

Carrier pigeons aren’t trained to establish a safe society for humanity. So if they get destroyed they haven’t failed at their primary objective. Governments, though…

I didn't think you were making the post to defend Bitwarden or something. I was just adding the details of one of the exploits the paper found that directly contradicted their claim.

Well, permanent because if it gets destroyed it you can't call it successful, and utopia because you need an ideal to measure success against even if its not realistically achievable.