this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
272 points (93.6% liked)

Science Memes

18262 readers
2751 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This has been done too much, I'd like to see a campaign to ban sodium chloride instead.

[–] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 14 points 1 month ago

+1 Might as well ban saccharides while you're at it.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 month ago

They forgot to add that it has the highest pH rating of any known acid.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

100% of people consuming it have died. Eventually. That stuff is dangerous!

[–] Tja@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

False. I have consumed it and haven't died.

I might in the future, but haven't died as of today.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, which doesn't make it true. The "have died eventually" applies to all participants in the battle of Trafalgar. Didn't immediately, but after some time. All dead now.

I've drunk water. I have not died.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe. The fact is not everyone who consumed it has died.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes they did - unless you count vampires.

[–] Iunnrais@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Mind your tenses. Will die, not have died.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I haven't, and I'm not a vampire.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

I'm not a vampire and I didn't die. I expect to, but I definitely haven't died in the past

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago

This is not accurate, only 93% has died so far!

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trees also consume it and they can technically live forever

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No they can't, at least not in general. The longest lived, easiest to date, life has been trees, but there's no suggestion that they'll survive climate change

Most trees have live spans in the low hundreds of years

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is no definitive proof either way. Fact is that they can live a long, long time. The oldest known trees are close to 5000 years old. There's even a clonal system estimated to be 80.000 years old. https://www.bbcearth.com/news/can-trees-really-live-forever

Fact is that a tree is much more likely to die from external factors than from old age. It cannot be proven, but it is certainly not impossible that (some) trees are immortal under the right circumstances.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

We have an eco system in southern Australia that at the moment is eucalyptus trees. They take over all at once after a fire, and they live about 300 years. When they die off rainforest trees and undergrowth take over, until there's a dry period and fire

[–] Setarkus@mander.xyz 24 points 1 month ago

The author of the petition is really looking out for others by not using the unlucky number in the list and taking care of souls for centuries even after their body's gone

by signing this petition, the undersigned agrees and acknowledges that the creator of this petition has legal ownership of my soul for the remainder of my natural life plus 1000 years.

[–] Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is water, they’re not going to ban it. What we need to ban is hydric acid, that’s the most dangerous chemical in the world.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Just saw a post saying mamdani wants Arabic numerals taught in schools and boomers were going crazy over it so.... maybe not everyone..

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The world would be even better if we just do away with oxidane!

[–] cepelinas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Forgot about americans. /kinda sorta sarcasm.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I signed this years ago. It still hasn’t been banned???

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Most drowning victims lost their lifes in this stuff! It's dangerous at fuck.

Also one hydrogen is already volatile, just imagine what two of them do!

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

Finally someone is thinking about our children

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ever since high school chemistry, I've wondered if it would be more correct to refer to it as hydrogen hydroxide. Yes? No?

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Sounds like reduced hydrogen peroxide, I like it.

My high school teacher called it that!

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Links gone :/

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Dihydrohen monoxide gave me dihydrohen monoxide tainted pee and my girlfriend died when she drank my pee.