this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
1373 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

17593 readers
3137 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why 600mm? Because sometimes you need really good photos of squirrels.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not even that much of a sacrifice. There are some modern 600s that weigh less than what a typical 70-200/2.8 does. Granted, they're on the darker side, but if you have the light (supposedly you will during a hike), you don't always need an f/4.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 101 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Pika is a real animal?

Gen 1 pokemon really are just funny colored real animals.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 90 points 3 days ago

“Ekans” is just “Snake” spelled backwards.

“Muk” is just…oh, oh god

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pika is pronounced "pie-kuh" generally. Pikachu comes from pika pika (japanese onomatopoeia for "sparking/sparkling" usually with the connotation of clean) + chuu (sound a mouse makes/squeak).

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Voltorb, Muk, Magnemite, and Mr Mime would all like a word with you. Jynx, however, doesn't mind.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Mountains in the eye of a trailside pika, ...

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

moments lost, like tears in rain

good bye

now I gotta watch blade runner again dammit! RIP Rutger Olsen Hauer for that performance god DAMN!

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

Eating seeds as a pastime activity

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 45 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Shit. My ADHD brain doesn't need another expensive hobby to hyperfixate on.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 62 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

Wanna buy my setup? My hyperfixation ended.

Edit: but for real, we should introduce a ADHD-sharing network. My old fixation could be yours and vice versa. And I could tell you everything I learned, which is a lot!

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genuinely, what do you have and what would you possibly be looking to get for it if you were interested in selling it? I've got a EF mount Tamron 150-600 contemporary but it's a little slow.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

EF ... I think sigma 120-400, but sluggish as well.

I wasn't able to convince myself to get on the proper Canon one.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's fair, yeah, it's still a good bit of glass but definitely not L glass for the snappy AF and monstrous front element that just eats light for breakfast.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

And I'm not trying to capture a cheetah chasing a motorcycle so I don't think I need the extreme fast AF.

[–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm super into this idea. It's got stuff! It's got sharing! It's got socializing! Seriously, what a rad idea

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

it's craigslist ;)

Let's get hyper fixated on this idea and make it a ... oh, I could start another hobby?

Can we get someone who can focus for longer than a week for project lead?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you afford to not get into photography, though?

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Dont spend money on fancy new cameras, chances are the camera in your phone is already better than 90% of all cameras in history. Don't drop a dime on equipment until you've hit the limits of the hardware you already have.

The picture above isn't a picture of what an expensive camera can do - it's a picture of what a good photographer can do, enhanced by specialty equipment. In the hands of a novice the equipment cannot produce pictures like this.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Phone cameras are great. Their compatibility with telephoto lenses is what sets them back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wildlife photography really is mostly about the equipment though. And waiting/being in the right place obviously. But I can tell you from experience, a novice can absolutely produce pictures like this with the right equipment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago

I get the point but there is no way my phone camera can capture the mountains reflected on the eyes of any animal even on full daylight

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 12 points 3 days ago

Phone cameras are good, yes, but their lenses are not. Even a cheap, used camera is better.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 46 points 3 days ago (3 children)

When you stare into pica, pica stares into you. Also sprach Zarathustra.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Casually using an amazing photo for a meme 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like the content, but seriously I’m baffled as to how this is a science meme?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I would assume because it's related to educating someone about why optical lenses can give an incredible amount of detail that digital just can't compete with. But that's just a guess and that might not even be enough for this forum

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Also, because posts like this drive really informative comment sections like this thread. I promise there's a method to the madness.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's a digital lens exactly?.. The only thing I can think of are in some point& shoot cameras and phones they have fake factorial zooms that are just cropping into the resolution.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i'm guessing it was a brain shortcut for a "digital zoom lens"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DearMoogle@lemmy.today 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What does it say, when it sneezes?

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Tap for spoilerPi

Ka

Chuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You can also see them directly, with your own eyes

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Big, if true

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Follow for more life hacks

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

but the pika is cute >.<

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

beautiful 🤌

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›