this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
275 points (97.9% liked)

politics

26527 readers
2054 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 15 minutes ago

At this point, I expect nothing but total compliance with the Republican agenda from the Democrats.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Hakeem Jeffries is fucking useless. He needs to be primaried.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago

Fucking excuse me?

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

Well knock me down with a feather, Dems don't give a fuck about extrajudicial killings, I may die of surprise.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Current clutch of Dems are useless cunts.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The Democratic party is a neo-liberal party, this is not something they oppose further than rhetoric to pacify the population, they are supportive of these war crimes and the potential colonial war on South America. Remember Obama's drone strikes that liberals hate to acknowledge.

The Democratic party uses leftist rhetoric to pacify and squash leftist revolution, they are not on your side.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Honesty is the best policy! Thanks you piece of shit!

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 47 points 13 hours ago

Primary them all, starting with this useless fuck.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 34 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Don't worry I don't expect Democrats to do anything even vaguely resembling vertebrate work. Just keep inching along, you worms, and get replaced by a functional, good government.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The only way the Untied States is getting a functional government and justice system is if there's a revolution

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Untied States

Probably a typo, but accurate nonetheless.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a typo. I've been intentionally calling it that online for months. It rarely seems to be noticed

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

I always liked United Snakes.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 12 minutes ago

Untied Snakes, perhaps?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

While I agree many if not most need to go, when the guy was asked if they would file impeachment articles, his response was basically there is no way the Republicans are going to vote on it so their is no point. Which is true. The Republicans would see a successful impeachment of Hegseth as a fracture that would allow all Republicans to have to answer for their crimes eventually. They'll shit on every single one of their constituents wants before they do that.

Shit I don't know if Johnson would even let it come to a vote

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Of coursenwe won't expect.it, because they're a bunch of passive, fearful Clitty McLabiasteins who care only about their jobs.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 51 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

...And so the tired meme continues to be relevant :

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

More people need to get this. Obama and Biden conducted airstrikes with the exact same expectations and the exact same "unlawful combatant" policy allowing us to ignore the Geneva conventions.

I guarantee anyone reading this that the guy calling these strikes has done the same thing his entire career. If they want to change that policy then go for it. But don't expect anyone to be prosecuted over doing it before that.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

I've been saying that the whole investigation thing is a nothing burger because to credibly go after Trump Democrats would also have to go after Obama.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

If you expected otherwise, I have a bridge for sale.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

Then close the investigation since there's no fucking point when you admit upfront you don't intend to do anything with the result.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 187 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It's not up to politicians to tell people what to expect of them. The people are the ones who tell the politicians what is expected of them.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 43 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This IS the point. We The People have to force them to do the right thing, a.k.a. our Right to Petition our representatives for a redress of our grievances. Get on the phone, email, snail mail, text message, and don't let up.

"Why it matters: Impeachment has been a fraught subject for Democrats this year, with Jeffries acknowledging that Republican control of both chambers of Congress makes any impeachment effort virtually dead on arrival.

"Republicans will never allow articles of impeachment to be brought to the floor of the House of Representatives, and we know that's the case," Jeffries said at a press conference Monday.
"Donald Trump will order them not to do it," he added."

I always prefer to let others make their own decisions, rather than pre-guessing them. Let the GOPers have the opportunity to defend their lack of prosecution of war crimes. And then the DEMs can make a talking point of that GOP decision.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 17 points 17 hours ago

Exactly why dem's struggle so much. Go on every damn tv station that will let you... get on every damn podcast you can... scream from the rooftops "HEY WE WANT TO PUNISH THIS ILLEGAL SHIT and they don't want us to. Force them on the defensive.... their base is already turning on them. We're watching districts flip in real time, show the american people what you are trying to do, so we can actually help you do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 27 points 15 hours ago

Don't worry, Hakeem, we weren't expecting you or the democrats to do anything helpful.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 126 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Jeffries says Democrats will disappoint you exactly as you expected they would.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Oh man, Classic Dem move. One of the absolute greats. So glad I have to vote for them or else.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But you do still have to vote for "no backbone" over "actively trying to kill you and the ones you love"

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

And I also have to accept that this is literally the best we can do as a nation.

Fuck this shithole country.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 3 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

It is hard to summon the will to vote nationally.

Which is why I vote for third party/independent. The act of doing what no one else is doing has a certain allure, and gets me to the voting booth.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 74 points 20 hours ago

Then Jeffries should not expect to be reelected next year.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I can only assume this means Jefferies thinks state sanctioned murder is permissable enough to not lose your job over. Which is a really dumb stance for someone way more likely to be a target of state sanctioned murder than a benefactor of it. Would anyone who excoriated us for criticizing Jefferies and the Dems inaction about kicking him out like to speak up today and continue defending him?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 14 hours ago

Fucking called it. Even if they had some amount of spine, seriously pursuing this would require them to be willing to throw Obama under the bus and that's just not happening.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 52 points 20 hours ago

don’t worry, nobody had or has the expectation of Democrats doing anything even remotely beneficial to the people and country. stress less.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 41 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 35 points 20 hours ago

Pussies. This cowardly decision was not reached in a vacuum.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 25 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Remind me why Hegseth hasn't been arrested for murder

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 29 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This is a perfect example of something you can use in a "both parties are the same" argument.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›