this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
158 points (98.8% liked)

technology

24153 readers
423 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Merit"
Werit
Wreit
Wɦiet
White

surprised-pika

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The term meritocracy never was meant to be taken seriously in the first place.

Political-fiction author: In my book I invented meritocracy as a cautionary tale.

The fucking Labour Party: At long last, we have created meritocracy from the classic novel Don't Create The Meritocracy

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Apparently the word was used (also derisively) two years prior to the novel I assume you're referring to.

(I looked briefly and failed to find a non-paywalled copy of the May 1956 Socialist Commentary for more context than the quote on that page.)

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

I don't believe this, next you'll be telling me it's impossible to pull oneself up by the bootstraps

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 54 points 1 month ago

what if there was an app that determined someone's social value based on a highly complex model that only needed to look at their skin tone? would the periodical that repeatedly dismissed the movement to abolish slavery as too radical be....

  • ☐ not interested
  • ☐ somewhat interested
  • ☑ very interested
[–] SmithrunHills@hexbear.net 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We so badly need another round of denazification. Maybe a couple dozen or so, while we're at it

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago

As long as there are Nazis to de, we need rounds to de them

[–] Kefla@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago

Here's where I keep my denazification rounds stalin-gun-1

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Champoloo@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

Even better, it's freaking AI!

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So Mr Guenzel and his co-authors used an algorithm to analyse the pictures of 96,000 MBA graduates, and extract what they call the “Photo Big Five”—as they rename the Big Five personality traits of agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism and openness.

The researchers were like, “Hey you know that WEIRD bias problem in psychology and sociology research? What if, instead of trying to negate it, we maximized it?”

[–] shallot@hexbear.net 46 points 1 month ago

MBA graduates

lol they wanted to see if they could caliper for “good at job” and they picked fucking MBAs lmao

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

firm handshake, smile and your daddy works with their daddy in local chambers of commerce bring a lot of success to recent mba grad.

[–] Nacarbac@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

Gotcha, dropping a smoke bomb in the interview room.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's just pictures of white people

Who could have predicted this? Not the LLM, obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh boy, time for another round of Economists Try To Do Math:
- A definitely real regression specification

- Error bars? We don't need to stinkin' error bars. We use the Excel bar chart defaults like God intended. And axis labels are for people who want to look like they understand what they're doing, which we certainly do not.

R Squared of <2 fucking percent. The whole model explains 2% of the variation in income. 2%; the traits alone account for only 0.3%. Literally only one of the "Big five" traits was even statistically significant! This is a nothingburger! I would tell an undergrad nice effort but maybe ask a less stupid question next time.

Who the fuck was dumb enough to publish this?

Guenzel, Marius and Kogan, Shimon and Niessner, Marina and Shue, Kelly, AI Personality Extraction from Faces: Labor Market Implications (January 09, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5089827 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5089827

Oh, so no one? The academic equivalent of self-publishing? The economist sure is going for the hard-hitting research. Anyone who was stupid enough to put their name on this thing deserves to be tarred and feathered.

[–] elpaso@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those coauthors are from "well regarded" business schools too.

Some competitive MBA programs want you to send in a photo. It's literally "Hot or Not." So this kind of bullshit from a business school does not surprise me.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wharton is really not doing anything to combat the idea that it's the safety school for failchildren. How many brilliant people are adjuncting out of their cars while the Marius Shitferbrains Guenzels of the world churn this drek out?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

> new method to analyze personality traits

> look inside

> scientific racism

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

Your gullibility is expected for one of your brainpan configuration galaxy-brain

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sebrof@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Once again, fuck the Economist.

Fuck all economists

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Economics is the one field I am proudly anti-intellectual about. Fuck the “economic experts”, smug out of touch elites.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

They're intellectuals in the same way L Ron Hubbard was an intellectual, fucking sky palace-dwelling priests of the Hungry God

[–] shallot@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

PhD in fart huffing

[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago

Economics and phrenology actually seems like a perfect match made in hell

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For fuck sakes. I assumed you had rediscovered something from a hundred years ago.

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Being told I'm too ugly for a job, luv 2 live in Amerikkka

[–] SupFBI@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

unironically

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There really needs to get to a point where it’s pointed out how rich people are such absolute manbabies.

It’s embarrassing I have to be a basement dweller because I didn’t become the bestest bestie to some spoiled rich brat and he won’t hire me as a token of our friendship.

Literally being subject to the adult equivalent of “neener neener! I’m having a birthday party and you’re not invited!” but my life depends on getting invited to such ‘birthday parties’.

[–] rubber_chicken@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago

Maybe the algorithm has a sense of humor and will re-Habsburg the bourgeoisie in a few generations.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“We will finally have meritocracy if only we made the world even MORE luck-based! Come on bro, one more luck-based patch.”

We literally already hide most jobs behind ‘networking’ and you think MORE pedigree is the solution to the shit state of the world? Unironically fuck yourself.

It’s the joke of throwing out half the applicants because “I don’t want unlucky people working for me” but fully unironic.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago

You may allege bias, but what if the shape of your skull can actually predict your propensity towards savagery?

[–] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm going to serious post this for a moment:

Pretty privilege is a thing. I think just as much as the racial (and other) biases this could complicate the pretty privilege problem. I'm a short, bald, older dude who is a 4 out of 10 physically on a good day. I know I've been turned down for promotions and shit simply because other people are way more attractive than me and frankly people just want to be around attractive people. I have always made less than my peers. It is what it is. My fear is that these stupid fucking metrics are going to go full fucking incel mode and start measuring negative canthal tilt and shit like that to really lock that in. This hearkens back to the argument on social media that there is a demand by wealthy couples for "ugly nannies" and my argument was for pretty people to sit the fuck out on this one. Let the ugly women have this one fucking thing. Anyways, that's my rant as an ugly dude I can literally only see this as another huge hit for my fellow uggos.

[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

1950s people: "Damn people in 2025 are gonna have flying cars and laser guns and shit"

2025:

BEHOLD, THE AMAZING ROBOPHRENOLOGIST!

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

porky-happy Hey, this new system I'm introducing might actually BENEFIT you in particular!

How many times have they used this line?

Oh wait I forgot it's the entire ideology

[–] Meltyheartlove@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago
[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

We trained our hiring AI to be racist and judge people by their looks. We care about merit very much

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

Technically this is physiognomy measurehead

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our future is Stupid Gattaca

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This pseudo science needs to be stopped ASAP. You can't even test these things in controlled environments, not in any reasonable way. These people are just looking for arbitrary patterns in things and trying to make sense of them.

It's like if I wrote a bunch of random letters on a napkin and someone desperately tried to find a reason behind them when I didn't intend there to be any reason.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

The Bell Curve and its consequences.

[–] forcefemjdwon@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DanComrd@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

It's the time for AI/Woke

load more comments
view more: next ›