this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
155 points (97.5% liked)

News

33127 readers
2869 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 85 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'll add that to my $5,000 DOGE dividend. Why do news outlets report what he says when he's obviously lying?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’ll bet money that he’s going to actually try to do this.

Remember when Congress voted to send Americans assistance checks during the pandemic — and Trump plastered his name all over those checks for shameless political points?

This guy 100% wants to send out “Trump” checks again.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I think he both really wants to do it, and at the same time is absolutely lying about having done any actual work or planning to make it happen. Trump love nothing more than to just hang stuff out there, knowing full well he'll capture the news cycle whether or not anything actually has a chance of happening here. But literally the entire country is now governed based on a large group of cronies and enablers trying to interpret his stray demented thoughts, so I'm not sure what we expected.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 104 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

What's high income 30k a year or more? Such a joke...

The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

Oh so no money for you

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So what this means is there will be no $2000 check. It will just be "hidden" relief that is almost impossible to actually see and verify. Cool cool cool

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

That's what I get out of it... something they can say they did... but its actually nothing...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 days ago

These are all measures which reinforce some negative aspects of US economy, apart from social security taxes.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 12 points 3 days ago

Great, so the four people who can itemize tips will benefit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So a $2k decrease in taxes using some kind of unspecified math, while cost of living increases by triple that number.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"I pay $1,000 more a month per rent than when trump first took office, pay 20% more taxes but he did send me a one time check for $2000"

Also the news should compare it to similar promises like "free fertility treatment" that he abandoned as soon as the news cycle was over.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 67 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Trump steals people's money, then gives some back to them, and that's supposed to pacify them?
How about not stealing people's money to begin with?

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and that's supposed to pacify them?

Every single MAGAt will instantly forget any complaints the second they have a check in hand.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't actually sound like anyone will get a check "lots of ways" probably means it's never going to happen, but all the MAGAs will point to him just saying this and gushing about how generous he is

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's weird, because the COVID checks were insanely popular and just giving everyone a $2000 check with his name on it would be great politics. I guess it's good they're doing it differently.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Bread and circuses

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Because he only has to be smarter than the dumbest people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

How about "There is Zero Evidence of $2000 Trump Checks Beyond Mere Words" as the headline ABC? Christ. Or "Trump Floats Idea of $2000 Checks, Or Maybe It's a Tax Rebate, Or Maybe Nothing, Or Maybe He Just Says Shit and We Eat It Up Every Time. Who Cares? Just Stay Scared and Don't Change That Dial!"

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

$2000 a person won't even offset the additional cost from the ACA subsidy reduction. So, a one-time check that would only cover several months of the recurring cost that he's given us.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

When you’re that rich, $2000 and $0 are basically the same. It’s a pittance for what they see as an underclass of poors.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 14 points 3 days ago

I think a lot of people don't get this.

Imagine there's something that you want--maybe a lot, maybe only a little. What that something is doesn't matter.

What amount of money would you consider to be a negligible amount for you to spend to get that thing you want? Maybe it's a few dollars or maybe it's as little as 10 cents. For me, now that I am reasonably comfortable, anything that only costs about a dollar, I consider to basically be free.

This is how the wealthy view anything that is "only" in the thousands of dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

It also won't make up for the small businesses that went under because their margins disappeared.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 44 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Lol, bet he's only saying this so when the Supreme Court comes down on his illegal tariffs he can say he was going to give us that money.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 days ago

Technically, If the Supreme Court rules that his tariffs were illegal to begin with, he will be expected to reimburse everyone affected. That may be all this is. He's just trying to spin it as spontaneous generosity, rather than a court ordered obligation.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago

I was just about to, but you interrupted me!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How about you use that money to pay SNAP instead?

[–] ninj4geek@lemmy.wtf 11 points 3 days ago

Because he can say this and it won't happen.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i believe it when i see it. he's announced the same thing back in may and nothing happened.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

He's just doing what Republican administrations have had to do over the past 20 years and bribing people with cash payments right near the end of their term after wrecking the economy.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

Not happening

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just ballparking that there are 250 million non-high-earners, at $2k a pop that's $500 billion. Two thousand dollars won't change anyone's life, but $500bn is a big chunk of the federal budget.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago

Sorry, I didn't mean to trivialize that amount of money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] splount@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In two weeks. Very special. Don't want to say much now but it's gonna be really special.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Trump 2 week chicken taco timeline.

He started with "solving crime in Chicago in 1 day"

Then they had a Medicare plan just a week away, but he learned that that was too close for the right wing spin machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is this dividend in the room with us right now?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago

He has concepts of a dividend.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

The ultra wealthy already got their 'tariff dividend', in the form of not tax breaks and a discrete heads-up of when to play the market to real maybe amounts of extra wealth.

As for the rest, this offer is just more bullshit. If it does surface (which is very unlikely) there will be some strings attached. And it will in no way fully compensate most people for the turmoil caused by these tariffs.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 days ago

He says a lot of things. Meanwhile he's gone out of his way repeatedly to try to starve millions of people.

Where exactly does that money come from? We end up paying more for it in the end due to inflation and it all trickles up as we spend it.

We need to raise taxes on the ruling class. There is no other way.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago

So this is where snap money has gone too

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I’ll take it the way I took his stupid ass signed pandemic check. It’s not gonna make me hate the fucker any less, and I’m not stupid enough to think the amount of money the average person has lost on these fucking tariffs is less than $2000. So yeah, pay me to keep the same opinion of you and your policies, shithead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

Also hand out cash to people for their medical bills bypassing insurance companies:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15272123/donald-trump-healthcare-plan-change.html

Obvs that's a lot worse than it sounds.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago

Lolz, for them it’s $5,000.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

🚨scam alert🚨

[–] HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm on SSD and don't even make enough to pay taxes to begin with, nor can I drive. If I have to shop around for insurance to replace Medicaid I'll just get denied for pre-existing conditions

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

As far as I know, those haven't been reestablished, but you can bet it's on the list.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh look.. Little ManBaby is trying to buy friends.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›