I have found gitit easy to install and use though not all that featureful. It uses git as a backing store and there is an apt package for it (apt install gitit).
solrize
Buys an Acura RDX SUV and is surprised that it's expensive. Isn't that kind of the point?
Why would ICE look for missing people in a dormitory? That's NYPD's job if it's anyone's.
You'd need phone vendors going along with it. Good luck with that.
1st paragraph:
One unseasonably warm afternoon in February 2023, in a very brown New York City courtroom, Rovier Carrington did the inconceivable: he admitted to a lie. On that day, the aspiring screenwriter told a federal judge that he had altered evidence to support his legal claim of being systematically raped and blacklisted by a bevy of Hollywood powerbrokers.
Nice, now do the Epstein files.
He is getting used to it I guess. "Sir" is a pretty big demotion from "your royal highness".
Ah thanks, I had no idea that there was a circuit split or that "derivative sovereign immunity" wasn't something pulled out of the company's butt just for the case at hand.
Hmm thanks, but still wonder why SCOTUS took the case in the first place. Also wonder whether the ruling will apply to Trump since ICE etc. have been ignoring orders from lower courts while appeals are in progress.
How did this even get to SCOTUS?

Well I heard about Bernie Madoff stealing millions, but compared to infinity that's chickenfeed, haha.
Srsly I'd call the headline overstated. Cantor conceived and proved a famous and important theorem but his proof was messy. He sent it to his then-buddy Dedekind and Dedekind suggested a way to make the proof cleaner. Cantor then submitted the cleaned-up proof for publication without citing Dedekind's improvements. That was a no-no but (analogy) the headline makes it sound like Cantor committed murder when he really only beat the crap out of the person. Still bad, but not all the way equivalent. Dedekind was rightfully pissed, but things eventually smoothed out somdwhat between them.
The article also goes into why Cantor didn't mention Dedekind in the paper. Basically Cantor knew that the journal editor considered Dedekind an enemy. So mentioning Dedekind might have made the paper more likely to get rejected. And for similarly political reasons, Cantor wanted the paper in that specific journal. So it is pitched as not being purely about personal glory, though who knows.
Anyway, the article is quite an interesting piece of historical research and not a good look for Cantor, but I'd have toned down the headline and blurb.