this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
433 points (99.3% liked)

News

33127 readers
3037 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Take away pay from house & senate members while the government is shut down, they don't deserve the special treatment. Then we'll see how fast this all gets resolved.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People keep suggesting this without thinking it through

Many congress members are quite wealthy. They could easily go without their salary at all, for their entire tenure. These people tend to make money off stock trading (at suspiciously high rates, but that's a different discussion), in addition to other investments and "consulting" generating revenue for them

There are, however, at least a few congress members that are not independently wealthy. Those members are actually working class and rely on their salary to live. Those people are the ones that will be squeezed without a paycheck

What do you think the end result of that will be?

The wealthy members of congress will be able to use shutdowns as a bludgeon to force the working class members to vote in line with them. The wealthy can hold out indefinitely. The working class can only hold out until rent is past-due

Long term, I'd expect to see two other knock-on effects. Working class members of congress will be heavily incentivized to start making very good stock picks to have backup income, or more outright corruption. The second effect would be a chilling effect on working class candidates even running for congress

Does that sound like a positive outcome? Are those the incentives you want in congress?

[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We could have both, reform for leadership performing trades AND we can stop paying them when the government shuts down. But this story was about the FAA workers who don't get paid with stocks.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

We could have both, reform for leadership performing trades AND we can stop paying them when the government shuts down

Okay, so we give a lot of power to the wealthy members of congress. It doesn't change the fundamental calculus that your suggestion would shift power from working class members of congress to the wealthy members. Even without insider trading, many of them are multi-millionaires and will not care at all that they don't receive their salary for a while

But this story was about the FAA workers who don’t get paid with stocks

That one has an easy solution that doesn't involve giving more power to the wealthy: Continue paying ATC during the shutdown

A much better generalized solution would instead to be forced budget continuation. Can't pass a bill? The old budget continues until you do

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Train the house and senate to do air traffuc control work.

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

But some how they are all Boeing planes.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world 13 points 6 days ago

This can't be good for the economy.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 137 points 1 week ago (21 children)

I, for one, am incredibly excited to see widespread inconvenience for the middle class. Hopefully this will wake some of these people the fuck up. The super rich still won't be effected enough, but maybe this will help stir up some malcontent against Orange Julius from the people unaffected by SNAP cuts.

The super rich still won’t be effected enough

Not majorly, but less commerce translates to less money for them because they profit off of all of our legal transactions.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Just in time for the holiday season too.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Private planes are still reliant on ATC, especially at out of the way, low traffic airports that will be the first to see cuts

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

If they stopped providing services to FL180+ non-part-121 traffic they'd see way more reduction in load than just cancelling a little 121 traffic. Idk if anyone has looked at the unfiltered flight trackers but there are a fuck ton of private/business jets up in the flight levels and they're not flying as predictable of routes (usually into smaller satellite airports near the main ones). They can't do that though because it would upset all the rich people.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Maybe we should just reject all IFR flight plans with less than 20 passengers other than life flights. Make the rich fly low and slow.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The super rich won't be directly affected but their businesses will.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just in time for the holidays, I’m here for it. Time for the middle class to wake the fuck up.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You guys have a middle class?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago

Guessing middle class is... college students with rich AF parents that pay to fly them home... and people really well set, but not quite in the private jet level.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gorsh, if only the FAA had more employees. Did the FAA use to have more employees? What happened to them? /sarcasm

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Honestly, I wonder how long til we have to close down an airport because staff just stops showing up entirely. I feel like absenteeism has to have gone exponential.

With the expense of flights, I also do think a lot about whether or not this disproportionately affects demographics who were more likely to have voted for Trump.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Upvoted you, but they frequently fly out of smaller/private airports that don't have direct ATC control anyway, so it's unlikely that's a significant contributor to a solution. Though I definitely agree it should be done at whatever scale it can be to improve general conditions.

[–] SpermHowitzer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most of the airports that private jets fly in and out of do have a tower. Also, there’s a lot of ground holds recently due to en route controller shortages which limits how much traffic can be in the air, which of course affects private jets as well.

[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah but lots of those towered smaller airports are staffed by contractor companies where the controllers are still getting paid normally rn

[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

I'd imagine a lot of private jets do fly IFR though which does involve ATC. So even if they fly out of a non towered airport, they probably file their IFR plan with a towered airport and start talking to them once in the air.

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Thanks for the laugh!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm still trying to process the fact that a moron known for being on "The Real World" is Transportation Secretary. And it's been months.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago

Everything is just so. Fucking. Stupid.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Idk what the real world means in this context.

[–] mrnarwall@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The Real World is an ongoing reality show on MTV. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy was in the 1997 season that took place in Boston Massachusetts.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure either, but I assume it's a TV show.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It was one of the first "reality TV" shows and naturally, it was completely fabricated.

In America, anyway, a lot of people seem to think that "reality TV" began with Survivor for whatever reason. I don't really understand this collective amnesia, since Cops (1989) and The Real World (1992) are both things that predated Survivor (2000), were on the air when Survivor started, and are still going...

Apparently, the first reality TV show credit goes to Candid Camera, which was on TV in 1948, and was predated by a show on radio in 1947. I have some vague memory of Candid Camera being on in the 70s or 80s, but I had no idea it went that far back.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

remember he also redirected his wifes flight away from the affected areas during the doge cuts of the atc.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The shutdown accelerated this, but it's far from the root cause. Even when it lifts, it's still on a bad trajectory.

Can't reduce training standards without causing lots of other problems.

Automation in older ways is possible but complicated. More modern AI would be a disaster. Though they might try.

There isn't really an answer. Air travel can't continue as it was, and there aren't enough plans for trains to come close to making up for it.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Pilot, in heated argument with copilot.

Pilot: I can do it, don't bet me!

Copilot: Yes, you could absolutely do a barrel roll in a Boeing 747, but there are a few considerations to address in your approach.

First, a Boeing 747's gross tonnage unloaded is...

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Richest country on the fucking planet yet we ~~can't~~ won't pay ATC 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 12 points 6 days ago

If we can't even hold the nation hostage, what's the point of authoritarian control?!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Paying people for work is just that "waste, fraud, and abuse" the Confederates kept babbling about.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I'm so glad I'm flying to one of the nations busiest airports next week.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you're a right wing libertarian or neoliberal who believes that governments are always corrupt, inefficient and incompetent, the best way to prove yourself right is to ensure that the government is always corrupt, inefficient and incompetent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›