this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
79 points (89.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35207 readers
1122 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In real life, if someone got a black hoodie and a mask and decided to "fight crime", how successful would they be?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 47 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

I'm ex-police (did 13 years - UK).

In 13 years of active patrol, (if you're not counting stopping someone suspicious, searching them and finding some drugs/weapon) I probably stumbled on a crime in progress maybe two or three times. Only one of those was what you'd call serious and that was a kid threatening another kid with a knife as i happened to walk round the corner.

And a couple of shop lifters whilst I was in the security office having a cup of tea with the shop manager.

The hardest part about being a vigilante is actually finding the crime in the first place.

The second hardest part would be actually detaining them without any real authority. The knife lad dropped the knife immediately when I shouted at him. As a masked vigilante you wouldn't have that authority. You don't have any backup or anyone to call. And you dont have anywhere to take your captured criminal once you've detained them.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Assuming UK cops aren't as utterly as untrustworthy as north american cops, (which you probably are purely because you don't always bring around a gun), what are you meant to do with a knife attack? Wack people with a stick? Run away and called for armed backup? I assume the latter, but what about in the immediate?

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 7 points 4 days ago

Carry out a "dynamic risk assessment".

For me i relied on shock, awe and the fact I was twice this lad's size.

But yes, metal stick/CS gas were options as well.

[–] Modest_Toxic@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of crime where I am and the police won't do a thing about it! Any idea how I would report the police for not coming out for the crimes? A few of the crimes are fighting, drug dealing, street racing, ant social behaviour all of which occur late at night/ early hours in the morning.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Contacting the local area commander/neighbourhood inspector would usually be your first port of call

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's nice to see a (former) cop getting to talk without everyone spamming ACAB. That doesn't actually help anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Finding it in the first place would be hard, and getting there faster than evenly-distributed squad cars would be even harder.

Then once they get there, more often than not beating an individual person up isn't the solution - even if it's a domestic, the victims have a way of sticking up for the abuser. Or maybe it's a dispute and you're not sure who the bad guy is, and you'd need some kind of court system to work it out anyway.

In real life where those problems can't be written out, you've basically taken everything the police are criticised for and amplified it.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You could specialize in types of crime the cops don’t usually get involved in, like corporate wage theft.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You need lawyers to fight that, not vigilantes

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] prex@aussie.zone 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Edit: Yeah, not really vigilante but still...

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Practicing law… without a license

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

This is literally Daredevil lmao

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's true, this isn't Mario and the money won't come out just from jumping on them.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I was gonna say. I know one CEO that isn't stealing anyone's wages anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Someone that fights through the layers of security guards until reaching the final boss of the CEO might change the CEO's mind with some physical persuasion.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Bruce Wayne would have reduced city crime way faster by building affordable housing, and tending to the basic needs of the homeless and the disadvantaged using only the extra profit margins of his wealth.

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

But he literally does. The problem is that Gotham is literally fucking cursed in a way that makes people aggressive and evil. And like, I don't think that kinda stuff would stop the Joker from bombing orphanages, or Black Mask/Penguin from running protection rackets, or stop Killer Croc from literally eating people, or stop Nigma from putting people in actual Saw traps...

Like, a good portion of Batman's rogue gallery are people that the police CANNOT deal with. Hell, I would argue that even an entire counter-terrorism unit couldn't deal with the bullshit the Batman rogues pull in a weekly basis.

EDIT: Oh yeah, let's not forget half of the police in Gotham (if not ALL OF IT) is corrupt and is getting bought by those SAME rogues.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Gordon is often the only one presented as untouched by mob money. Usually a few other younger, newer recruits that are too green to get a piece of the spoils.

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Commissioner Gordon is the only good cop. I respect him more than any other Batman character, even Bats himself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HelluvaKick@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

The last movie touches on this in that there is a Wayne fund for this improving socioeconomic conditions, but every politician and mafia member has their fingers in it. Good shit. Could've cut the length by a good 40 minutes or so

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Low level individual crimes wouldn't be practical. Probably more worthwhile to try to follow more reliable organised crime or repeat offending criminals or something. Although even that wouldn't practical as an individual without serious investigative resources and you'd still probably end up dead pretty quickly.

The only successful vigilantism is probably the online entrapment of paedophiles or something of that sort. Even that is highly questionable.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Going undercover to eventually blow the whistle could be doable, I guess. I seem to remember reading in a criminology text that there's actually career snitches that do basically that in hopes of a reward. Which seems crazy, but whatever.

It's not really what I think OP was thinking of, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Depends entirely on how successful the media wanted him to be. He could be a just, moral and enlightened force for good, but if the he wasn't dancing to the tune of certain corporations the public could very easily be made to hate him.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fighting street crime is tough, hard to find and it leaves little evidence. White collar crime OTH often leaves a paper trail. They don’t wear capes, but investigative journalists use these paper trails to uncover such crimes.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, Bellingcat is the closest thing to a real Batman.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

I laughed so hard when I found out about him selling MDMA

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Ask Phoenix Jones. He did exactly that for three years, although he never actually tried to conceal his identity. He retired from superheroing to be an MMA fighter.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Not very. The list of real-world obstacles is long, but there are a few top ones that leave super-heroes firmly in the world of fantasy. (Outside of a few edge-cases that others have listed here, people who really seem to have done small-time stunts for attention rather than a real effort to "fight crime.")

  • Guns. The biggest obstacle in the US at least would be the high likelihood that the criminals you try to beat up, people already willing to break the law and victimize others, will just pull out a gun and shoot you in the face because you seem insane and threatening. Body armor may help with some shots from some angles and some calibers, but most likely you will go down even if it stops the bullet.

  • Getting your ass beat. I studied and taught self-defense and martial arts for well over a decade. The biggest lesson I learned from it is to NEVER get into a fight if you can at all help it. It doesn't matter how big and tough you are, if you're looking for a fight on the streets, you WILL get hurt. You will lose teeth, you will get maimed, you will get cut and stabbed, you will face off two people and one will trip you and you will end up with every rib in your body shattered. Every street fight ends up rolling around on the ground, do YOU want to end up on the ground with multiple people trying to kick your teeth in?

  • Finding a crime. If you're really lucky you might see a hollywood-style crime in progress once in your life. The "group of robbers hijacking an armored car" type crimes are vastly outweighed by the "ex boyfriend uses his key and slips in while everyone is gone and takes the playstation and perfumes" type crimes. The vast majority of ALL crimes are between people who know each other or family members, how tf you gonna find that shit going down?

  • Cops. Their success rate at catching perpetrators and suspects is much lower than media would like you to believe, but they're generally going to be better armed, more organized and more capable of finding and arresting your ass. They don't take kindly to nutcases on the street upstaging them or causing public disturbances.

Let's say you prepare. Let's say you train and be the best fighter in the world. Let's say you get money or investors who help you develop the highest-level meta-material alloy armors and weapons and electronics. A million dollars in advanced optics, ballistic armor that lets you move freely, drones that fly around and scout for you, machine-gun tasers or knockout-gas bombs and rope-bola launchers that let you trip up bad guys before they even get close... you still trip on a curb and get your ass beat and your gear stolen, because running around the streets in the dark is fucking hard and you are still always just going to be a lone human made of squishy meat and with limited capabilities.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

It happens, and they aren't as impactful as they are represented in movies, TV, and comics.

I first learned about this phenomenon when Phoenix Jones was arrested for using pepper spray to break up a street fight. That's when I learned that there are a handful of people all over the world that don a mask to confront crime. There's a list on Wikipedia.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

unless they have powers, they will end like luigi, weeks or months. unless you are cognizant enough to hit a different area/person every time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Hopefully they'd be arrested quickly. Crime isn't some big force in the night you csn just go out and fight. It's people doing things until the thing they do is illegal. It's hidden usually. That person would probably beat up a lot of people who can't be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and they're likely to just get picked up for acting suspicious

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Real life would probably lean more toward a detective gathering evidence v getting into fights.

Using OSINT techniques to find convicted people for the bounty is a fairly safe way to fight crime.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

My sister does this as a job. Builds big evidence piles and then hands them to federal authorities. They do the drive up and handcuff part, then lawyers do the rest. But if it's evidence she's compiled, you can be sure the defence can't do much else than minimise penalty/jail time.

The best part is she is able to do things the police can't, then use that information to set up smoking guns that law can use.

It's about as superhero as someone can get without getting off the computer.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] prex@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Awesome.
At a lower level there was that guy who drew dicks on potholes to get the council to fix them. Edit: wanksy

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Pre-19th century: would literally make out like a bandit, assuming they knew how to fight & had supernatural powers

20th century: would make out like gangbusters until the invention and widespread use of CCTV

21st century: without active electronic/optics countermeasures, it's all over, anonymity of secret identity impossible to keep

Same scenario goes for villains, who were previously able to simply outrun/outwit pursuit by authorities, often within the same country. Wire services made this more difficult, depending on the pursuers in question, then moreso with radio, then moreso with telephony & TV broadcasts, then moreso with the advent of the internet. Current tech can analyze recording of subjects and lift face shots, as well as highly specific information like gait (now sometimes touted in the same way as debunked "bite mark analysis" circa the 1980's courts/justice system). A hoodie would be workable only under the loosest conditions, the second that anyone pulled off the hood, or the subject in question were photographed both with/without it on, it's all over.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›