this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)

chat

8505 readers
184 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm a cishet dude and I find them beautiful and very nice. Any guy that tries to prove his manhood by being a neckbeard about them being like "oh these eldritch abominations! pronouns " need to grow the fuck up and touch grass, let alone actually interact with a woman.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 2 points 4 hours ago

If they turn you on that is totally cool.

However me being 100% gay - they turn me off. Love women as friends but anything more? nyet

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

(Not a vagina owner) vaginas and vulvas are neat. No complaints there.

But uterus’s and ovaries are a disaster zone. I’d say the majority of the vagina owners in my life have had debilitating issues at one time or another with uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts, on top of that periods suck and Drs are hopelessly badly informed / willfully cruel with womens health issues. So as a complete package I wouldn’t recommend.

[–] Midnight_Pearl@hexbear.net 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

i've seen this shit way too much from cishet frothingfash guys whose only actual interest in sex is make pp feel good

they look really pretty like flowers and they create life; like how is that not the coolest thing ever

[–] Kefla@hexbear.net 3 points 5 hours ago

I don't really care about the life creating part (and actually most of what does that is the stuff you can't see unassisted) but I agree, vulvas are very pretty and diverse. And I think it's really cool how they change depending on arousal.

It goes both ways though, a lot of people say this same stuff about penises, and I don't see it there either. I love those lil guys, they got adorable helmets and everything.

I'm just kind of in love with the human body in general I guess, there's no part of it that I don't like, at least out of the things I can see with my eyes. I probably wouldn't be a fan of the goopy internal organ bits, but I can just pretend those don't exist i-love-not-thinking

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

’oh these eldritch abominations! ‘

lmao

Let’s be honest, you can say that about genitals in general. Saw my dog’s red rocket when he saw a girl he liked and that was something out of Alien, fuck that

[–] Bob_Odenkirk@hexbear.net 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

genitals are one of the least attractive parts of the human body imo. love em for their function, but I'd rather look at basically anything else on my partner.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

i think it's a context or framing thing. a medical closeup isn't very flattering for anything

[–] Bob_Odenkirk@hexbear.net 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

if the context is "i'm seeing this because this person wants to have sex with me" then its gonna be the most attractive thing in the world, but then any bodypart with that context would be

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

of course. i can also think of some erotic presentations that aren't a 480i vhs money shot, but i won't elaborate.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

i've never known a single man in person who has ever said that

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 9 points 12 hours ago

Oh I have, really shitty dudes too, as you'd imagine.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

i met a guy in high school who had this argument with one of my friends. they ended up dating for a while

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly any bodily organ is an eldritch abomination if you think about it too hard.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 10 points 17 hours ago

The heart comes to mind when I think that, kinda weird looking when I first saw a real image of it that wasn't the cartoon kind.

[–] robotElder2@hexbear.net 18 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I've never heard that take but if I did i would suspect the speaker was not actually attracted to women at all.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have heard a take criticizing vulvas as unsexy and complaining about why porn zooms in on them when he wants to see the whole person. But this was from a very gay friend who knew he was gay and did not find vulvas sexy trying to express his confusion about what I found sexy about vulvas.

[–] Bob_Odenkirk@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm mostly straight and I think this too. genuinely nothing aesthetically sexy about vulvas in isolation imo.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It was super common among guys my age growing up in the 90's into the 2000's. And yeah it's lowkey just admitting you're not really into women much afterall.

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"straight sex and heterosexuality is basically gay" is one of the all time funniest cultural signifiers though. in the year 2000, it would seem that the only straight thing for men was exclusively hanging with/dating/fucking men

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

the marilyn frye effect

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 8 points 16 hours ago

The sour grapes fox, I can't get laid with women so sex is gay.